How could they make this decision!
A lot of them are unhappy with the decisions made at the EU level - they believe that Britain has little say in its own economy and that the EU benefits more from having Britain in it than Britain benefits from being in it. They may be right for certain sectors of the economy, and wrong for others, so it's not a slam-dunk in terms of proving it one way or the other. While they are not in financial distress, many are concerned at the level of control the EU has over country economies - forcing some countries to accept loans and austerity measures, for instance, doesn't sit well with some.
The reality is that the EU was formed as an economic development entity, and has been able to regularize things economically, but not politically. There are many within the EU, however, who are trying to turn the EU into a US style republic, and insert some politics into the EU governance - they feel they're supporting some countries that are making bad economic decisions due to their politics, and that a more powerful EU might be able to be more efficient.
So while that's unlikely, and it's more likely that the EU will never be more than an economic entity, the fears and unhappiness over existing decisions affecting people have led many to believe they'd be better off without membership in the EU.[DOUBLEPOST=1466739412,1466739373][/DOUBLEPOST]
I actually understand - I just meant it in a more rhetorical, 'how doesn't everyone agree with me' way.
This is everything I love about news cycles. I can never sleep on election nights.
Ah, well then you'll want to ignore the post I made while you were typing yours...