I mean...do you read the threads on this forum?Geeks/nerds/gamers can be some of the most entitled people ever, and prone to obnoxiousness.
Sounds like you need to quit playing for the Horde then...I actually make it a point to not mention I'm a girl in MMOs, unless I'm in raiding guild in which I need to use vent, and thus my secret is automatically blown. Because trolls lol.
I play on both sides, Alliance is usually worse. Just sayin. =/Sounds like you need to quit playing for the Horde then...
I reject this statement as false. Very false. Extremely false.I'll answer that question, Droll, if you answer me another one.
Why/how is it, that geek girls only seem to come in two varieties? The same is, up to a point, true for male geeks as well, but I find it much more pronounced in women. You have the ugly-fat-weat-stained-don't-want-to-go-near-with-a-ten-foot-pole type (who are usually awesome and very caring and fun), and you get the so-hot-it's-not-fair-they'-re-also-smart variety (who, in the case of those I know, when nerd, also turn out to be nice. Dammit! I don know why I always crush on geek girls, admittedly, it seems to be 90% of women who are smart, intelligent and hot at the same time are geeks )
Fair enough, I haven't really given it a lot of thought so I may very well be wrong. But, what statement? I make several in that postI reject this statement as false. Very false. Extremely false.
I only quoted the one I meant.Fair enough, I haven't really given it a lot of thought so I may very well be wrong. But, what statement? I make several in that post
But you do at least realize how fucking stupid this is, right? Especially when someone is targeted for her gender?Can we stop it? No. There's always going to be a pecking order, and that means there are always going to be those who will take whatever opportunity they can get to climb their ladder, even (or especially) at the expense or on the backs of others. The ones who don't screw up will be rewarded with position and prestige, the ones who fail will be fodder for the rest.
--Patrick
Ditto. I've met enough geeks of both genders that fall all over the attractiveness spectrum to disagree with this statement as well.I reject this statement as false. Very false. Extremely false.
So....Is itI only quoted the one I meant.
Ah. Fair enough. Let me state very clearly, then, that I do not mean to imply that geek cred (or any other personality characteristic) is intrinsically linked to any physical characteristic*. Note, by the way, that I was talking about gender, not sex. Also, I'm a strong believer that beauty is subjective. Perhaps it is my taste in women which outlines itself by my perception of female geeks.I think the problem, bubble, is that your post appears to loosely link physical characteristics, such as attractiveness, with geek proficiency or cred.
Most people agree that physical characteristics have little to do with their character, qualities, and values, and so discussing them in the same topic as though the physical characteristics have any bearing on the discussion is probably going to be met with resistance.
My guess on this, from personal experience -- and I'd be interested in what the other women on the forum think about this -- is that a lot of women who grew up to be nerds were the "uncool" kids in elementary/high school. Some of the uncool girls grew up to be reasonably hot, but when you're ostracized as a kid, I think you're generally more aware of how you treat people. Just a theory.It's not at all what I'm talking about, except perhaps that, in my personal experience, good-looking nerds tend to be more pleasant and less bitchy/haughty/whatever than good-looking non-nerds. That's not limited to women, though.
It does happen to men too. I've seen several cases at my LCBS where people are given crap, looked down on for appearing like they take care of themselves, and actually work out. Regardless of gender it's a ridiculous conversation and like you mention extremely ironic. Although even in high school the most cliquish people I knew were the ones who raged against the "jocks".Enough with this trying to evaluate whether a girl is a "real geek" or a "booth babe" or somewhere in between. Seriously. It demeans everyone involved. Geekdom is not some super-exclusive club with minimum criteria for membership (but only if you have a vagina, of course. I have yet to hear a conversation about how a guy isn't a real geek and is only pretending to "satisfy his hollow ego.") If anything, it's ironic as hell that a group that has historically been defined by its outsider status is now trying to figure out whether certain women are good enough to sit at the cool kids' table.
I've got nothing. It seems stupid to me too.Are there women (and men, for that matter) who pretend to be something they're not for attention? Yup. But so what? Best case scenario, they'll look like assholes if it becomes obvious that they don't know what the hell they're talking about. (Actually, scratch that -- best case scenario, they'll discover new interests and want to get more involved in the community.) Worst case scenario, we all get to see some nice boobies. (I can't for the life of me understand why anyone is bitching about roving gangs of attractive women, except perhaps for a latent inferiority complex from when the pretty popular girl said something mean back in high school. If someone offered me a few hundred bucks to stand around in heels and smile, I'd sure as hell be a booth babe too.)
Mav's of the world take note.So, seriously, if a girl says she's a gamer but only plays World of Warcraft/Call of Duty/Wii/etc. -- don't give her shit about because you are LOL SUPERIOR. Take it as an opportunity to share your interests. Everyone has to start somewhere, and I know a few girls that grew up pursuing more traditional female interests and are just now starting to get into gaming/fantasy/anime/etc.
But how will I be able to judge people by assigning them the exact negative behavior I'm engaging in, based on a meaningless stereotype? In all seriousness, things like above only serve to perpetuate stereotypes and is a self-satisfying behavior. One thing I like about halforums is as you mentioned I don't see much (note much) of that here, possibly because of the wide range of people on these boards. There are quite a bit of geek communities I now avoid just for the sheer amount of elitism seeping from the members. This may be just a problem with online communities as a whole, but I've experienced it IRL with Comic and RP nerds, not so much with sports fans (again IRL).For the record, I don't see much of this going on with the male members of this forum -- although that may be because most, if not all, of the females here are deeply entrenched in the geek community -- but I've had my jimmies rustled by this shit over the last few days and wanted to rant about it. With the traditional portrayal/objectification of women in geek media, especially comics, anime, and video games, we have enough hurdles to overcome; let's stop with the twenty questions to make sure we're "geek enough."
My guess on this, from personal experience -- and I'd be interested in what the other women on the forum think about this -- is that a lot of women who grew up to be nerds were the "uncool" kids in elementary/high school. Some of the uncool girls grew up to be reasonably hot, but when you're ostracized as a kid, I think you're generally more aware of how you treat people. Just a theory.
I totally agree. I don't understand why this is even a thing. Why do we constantly try to evaluate women in geek culture? Why are we always trying to assess their credibility? Because the majority of male geeks see them as girls/sex objects first, and people second. And that's fucking deplorable.The degree of male privilege in gaming / nerd culture is just staggering and awful.
And that's where I think your wrong, and where you've missed the point of Droll's original post. There is a difference between how male and female geeks/nerds (whatever) are assessed. There is also a difference in how they are treated (see Dei's comment), but I think that's a different issue.Note that I'm talking in general now, not just about women or some such. I don't think that's a really meaningful difference on this.
And that's where I think your wrong, and where you've missed the point of Droll's original post. There is a difference between how male and female geeks/nerds (whatever) are assessed. There is also a difference in how they are treated (see Dei's comment), but I think that's a different issue.
I'm not saying I think you're a mysogynist/anti-women/whatever. But consider this: if everyone always seems to misinterpret what you say, across different threads, across different days and weeks, maybe you should think about how clearly you are communicating. Which is easier to believe: everyone misinterprets what you say, or that you aren't doing an effective job at expressing your position accurately?Also, I'm out. I can already tell this is yet another thread where people will joyfully misinterpret what I say until they can paint me as a misogynist/rape apologist/anti-women/whatever, and I'm frankly quite sick of it.
This board has some weird ways of having a conversation.
I had to reread this several times before I believed someone actually wrote this. Really? REALLY?!! Could you be more insulting?I'll answer that question, Droll, if you answer me another one.
Why/how is it, that geek girls only seem to come in two varieties? The same is, up to a point, true for male geeks as well, but I find it much more pronounced in women. You have the ugly-fat-weat-stained-don't-want-to-go-near-with-a-ten-foot-pole type (who are usually awesome and very caring and fun), and you get the so-hot-it's-not-fair-they'-re-also-smart variety (who, in the case of those I know, when nerd, also turn out to be nice. Dammit! I do know why I always crush on geek girls, admittedly, it seems to be 90% of women who are smart, intelligent and hot at the same time are geeks ).
No, and that's bullshit. Women don't want to be treated differently, shouldn't have to be treated differently, and it's the morons that need to learn to deal with it.If women don't want to be treated differently from men then they need to accept that some geeks are going to go after any angle they can to try and feel superior to them/tear them down to protect their own shallow ego.
So, you know....deal with it.
What he's getting at is that geek 'men' do it to each other too.No, and that's bullshit. Women don't want to be treated differently, shouldn't have to be treated differently, and it's the morons that need to learn to deal with it.
That's a stupid thing to say, no matter how you slice and dice it, or limit it to particular groups on either end of the abuse.[people] need to accept [abuse]
Bumble speaks the truth!That's a stupid thing to say, no matter how you slice and dice it, or limit it to particular groups on either end of the abuse.
Really, really dumb. No one should ever be told to sit down, shut up, and take it without complaint.
Bad horse! Bad horse! Bad horse! He's bad!Let's put this to rest. Felicia Day is not a geek girl... She is a geek horse.
Carry on.
Because a lot of dorks can't comprehend why someone they think has de facto instant access to sex on demand would want to partake in what they themselves use to cope with not having instant access to sex on demand.I totally agree. I don't understand why this is even a thing. Why do we constantly try to evaluate women in geek culture? Why are we always trying to assess their credibility?
Interesting assertion. Probably a bad assumption to hold in general, but interesting nonetheless.a lot of dorks ... use [their hobby] to cope with not having instant access to sex on demand.
No, and that's bullshit. Women don't want to be treated differently, shouldn't have to be treated differently, and it's the morons that need to learn to deal with it.
Betty Childs, Pi-Delta-Pi: [blissfully] Oh, Stan. You were wonderful. You did things to me you've never done before.Interesting assertion.
This is exactly what I am saying, and I should have put it that way.What he's getting at is that geek 'men' do it to each other too.
You have no idea how good that makes me feel. We've striven to make this a place where everyone is welcome, whether they are gay, straight, white, black, male, female, etc. Do we always get to the level I'd like to see? No. But we try. I can't remember the last time someone made a discriminatory remark and wasn't called out on it. Sometimes we even go too far the other way in trying NOT to offend...and that offends some.Regardless...I love you guys and want you to know, I've never felt threatened on here or felt like Iwas being looked down upon for being female.
You have no idea how good that makes me feel. We've striven to make this a place where everyone is welcome, whether they are gay, straight, white, black, male, female, etc. Do we always get to the level I'd like to see? No. But we try. I can't remember the last time someone made a discriminatory remark and wasn't called out on it. Sometimes we even go too far the other way in trying NOT to offend...and that offends some.
But to see a very real statement by someone who on other sites might be totally creeped on & creeped out, well, that makes me feel good.
Keep up the good work, HF.
And not due to the hundreds of creepy Woody pics he's posted over the last two years?Yer going to hell for that one...
Seriously.Man, if I treated ANY woman how I treat my male FRIENDS, I'd always be in the hospital or jail.
I don't and don't think anyone should, but it's worrisome to see crap like that on CNN, because it sends the message that it's common and acceptable behavior among the sub-culture.The point is that, why does anyone care what these people think?
I love hearing my some of my male friends talk to one another. It's like having access to a 24-hour roast channel.Seriously.
That's....that's fair actually. I've gone off the hook for this exact issue (the subculture representing itself in a way that I feel denegrates me.) So...I'll change my view on it.I don't and don't think anyone should, but it's worrisome to see crap like that on CNN, because it sends the message that it's common and acceptable behavior among the sub-culture.
go onHey Charlie did you find the movie Super Troopers mysogonistic, because I could go ahead and walk your train of thought down the road into a 20 car pileup for you if you would like.
Care to elaborate? I find myself curious about the dangerous/illegal shit that you do to your male friends.Man, if I treated ANY woman how I treat my male FRIENDS, I'd always be in the hospital or jail.
But really I have a lot of black friends, but these N...................................CNN Article said:And be it known that I am good friends with several stunningly beautiful women who cosplay as stunningly beautiful characters from comics, sci-fi, fantasy and other genres of fandom. They are, each of them, bone fide geeks. They belong with us. Being beautiful is not a crime.
Ultimately a lot of it flat out comes down to hormones (testosterone vs estrogen) and human nature. Men are inherently and openly competitive and aggressive with each other. Women are different. There are things that men find fun that women simply wouldn't understand, or would interpret in a different way than a man. Vice versa is true as well.Care to elaborate? I find myself curious about the dangerous/illegal shit that you do to your male friends.
Unless, of course, you're trying to say that ALL women are oversensitive, thin-skinned bitches who blow harmless fun way out of proportion. But surely you can't be that much of an asshat.
You clearly have never been to a roller derby bout. I have a few nasty bruises that prove you totally wrong.Ultimately a lot of it flat out comes down to hormones (testosterone vs estrogen) and human nature. Men are inherently and openly competitive and aggressive with each other. Women are different. /quote]
Men aren't nice to each other out of earshot of ladies.Care to elaborate? I find myself curious about the dangerous/illegal shit that you do to your male friends.
Unless, of course, you're trying to say that ALL women are oversensitive, thin-skinned bitches who blow harmless fun way out of proportion. But surely you can't be that much of an asshat.
The things I do to my guy friends I would not do to random guys on the street, or even to done of my other guy friends, because a part of human interaction is knowing that different people react differently. And the same applies to both genders.Care to elaborate? I find myself curious about the dangerous/illegal shit that you do to your male friends.
Unless, of course, you're trying to say that ALL women are oversensitive, thin-skinned bitches who blow harmless fun way out of proportion. But surely you can't be that much of an asshat.
biotruths itt (now I am mocking you)Ultimately a lot of it flat out comes down to hormones (testosterone vs estrogen) and human nature. Men are inherently and openly competitive and aggressive with each other. Women are different. There are things that men find fun that women simply wouldn't understand, or would interpret in a different way than a man. .
I am nice to all of my male friends. Maybe you are just jerks and it is not a symptom of being a man?Men aren't nice to each other out of earshot of ladies.
you and me babyA lot of it also has to do with the fact that hetero men and women are at some level inclined (in at least 1 direction in most cases) towards mating, whereas male-male or female-female are not. This may not affect how a woman acts towards a man, but it definitely affects how a man acts towards a woman (unless it's a close relative, and seriously, I mean close)..
WOMEN THOUGHI am nice to all of my male friends. Maybe you are just jerks and it is not a symptom of being a man?
I'm not surprised that you don't see how your own White Knight attitude is a result of testosterone.biotruths itt (now I am mocking you)
I'm not exclusively sexually attracted to minorities or the poor????I'm not surprised that you don't see how your own White Knight attitude is a result of testosterone.
No, but the only people that have a chance of breaking their internal programming are those that admit to it's existence. And I've never gotten the impression that you've ever gotten anywhere near breaking your programming.I'm not exclusively sexually attracted to minorities or the poor????
I was a young republican and libertarian and wore t-shirts with the Confederate flag in high schoolNo, but the only people that have a chance of breaking their internal programming are those that admit to it's existence. And I've never gotten the impression that you've ever gotten anywhere near breaking your programming.
I mean, come one, this is like Asimov 101 mate.
I know more people like me than you purport to be.I am nice to all of my male friends. Maybe you are just jerks and it is not a symptom of being a man?
This explains a lot.I can honestly say my friends and I have never done anything like this to one another.
oh wow I guess you edited in a rage comic, hi there rage comic. haha women are so catty!I know more people like me than you purport to be.
I'm not saying we beat the hell out of each other, just that we're much more... coarse and uncensored. I game with my significant other, and when I do, it's totally different than when I game with my best friend. For example, I would never in a million years dream of saying "Quit hogging the ammo you cock guzzling no-talent shit-eating buttslut, jesus christ why do you suck so bad?" to her. Him, it'd hardly be a noteworthy occurrence. Another friend, we replaced his desktop and all his browser favorites with gay porn. And his startup noise. It was hilarious. I've never drawn pictures in permanent marker on a sleeping woman, or even the tamer version of simply stacking garbage on them. And so on.
In the same vein -
Uh-huh. I have three brothers, most of my friends are male, and I've had several jobs when I was the only female in the department. Some women can handle being "one of the guys," believe it or not. We're not all delicate little flowers. But feel free to keep painting 50% of the human population with one brush, please. It's quite endearingMen aren't nice to each other out of earshot of ladies.
Not quite sure what that means. Are you saying that it's a bad thing that my friends and I don't treat each other like enemies or junior high kids?This explains a lot.
You know since this was the actualy point of the original post, I think it's fair to say that we all agree with this, even if we do disagree on details.If anyone is worried about fake nerds taking up their precious hobby and reexamine your life because you've got your priorities all wrong.
Nigga, please, I know 55 year old guys who still act that way.oh wow I guess you edited in a rage comic, hi there rage comic. haha women are so catty!
Anyways, before I was distracted by a hilarious comic that succinctly made an argument, I was going to say I thought you were out of college, my bad. Yeah that shit happens!
Yeah, I don't disagree with you there. Some guys still have yet to realize what most of the rest of us learned in grade school - be nice to girls.ANYWAYS
Nerds and the people who supply nerds with their vices (game designers, fantasy authors, TV show creators, comic book companies, etc) need to wise the fuck up and realize that women are part of their target audience and won't be driven away despite how toxic other nerds can be. Even today, I still see comic book people arguing that the only fans are male and white. A quick trip to the comicbook store or convention will show that there are just as many minorities and women buying up Sci-Fi and comicbook shit like it is going out of style.
If anyone is worried about fake nerds taking up their precious hobby and reexamine your life because you've got your priorities all wrong.
Your terrible for exchanging one form of zealotry for another and thinking that you fixed the problemam I terrible for never changing my mind or for changing my mind, figure it out
*yawn wake up, open window, stretch*I have to admit, I find the idea of Charlie becoming magically, instantaneously attracted to white Americans when they officially are no longer the majority really freakin' funny.
Some, but they are the vast minority. Guys are, without malice, as mean and nasty to each other as they can think to be as a game. As bonding. There are exceptions to every rule, but in general it's safer to assume that men and women are different.Uh-huh. I have three brothers, most of my friends are male, and I've had several jobs when I was the only female in the department. Some women can handle being "one of the guys," believe it or not. We're not all delicate little flowers. But feel free to keep painting 50% of the human population with one brush, please. It's quite endearing
Fuck you you wonderful lady, I'm not sexist.There's a difference between a male friend making a joke at my expense because he respects/likes me enough to know I can handle it (and my brothers/male AND female friends and I have come up with some fun names and insults for each other during gaming sessions), and some random jerk with a "LOL SHOULDN'T YOU BE IN THE KITCHEN INSTEAD???" attitude when it comes to the hobbies I enjoy. The latter is what I'm addressing here. Sucks that you don't have any cool female friends, but yeah, totally not the point. But keep up the great sexism!
Fair enough, people in the latter don't have a good sense of humor and would be boring to either men or women. But do you acknowledge that men will treat women differently simply for realities of human mating? The way a human will interact with another human when mating is not on the table is significantly different from when it is, and for most men mating is always on the mind (at some level).There's a difference between a male friend making a joke at my expense because he respects/likes me enough to know I can handle it (and my brothers/male AND female friends and I have come up with some fun names and insults for each other during gaming sessions), and some random jerk with a "LOL SHOULDN'T YOU BE IN THE KITCHEN INSTEAD???" attitude when it comes to the hobbies I enjoy. The latter is what I'm addressing here. Sucks that you don't have any cool female friends, but yeah, totally not the point. But keep up the great sexism!
The odd thing is that many of them do realize that...and then take it in another direction entirely and say, "well, if they're not leaving, they must LOVE the way we do things, so let's keep on keepin' on!"need to wise the fuck up and realize that women are part of their target audience and won't be driven away despite how toxic other nerds can be.
It's not a filter. We don't allow name calling.Ok, I want to know if bitch is an automatic filter or if dave doesn't think that the tough geek chick who "can handle it" can't handle the word bitch, even when used in ironic jest.
Aaand that answers that.
You'll never understand. You're condemned to be a melvin forever.Not quite sure what that means. Are you saying that it's a bad thing that my friends and I don't treat each other like enemies or junior high kids?
A lot of women are like that. Some women aren't. What I took exception to was the "ANY woman" part of your statement because, yeah, a woman's sense of humor can be just as varied as a man's. I'm sure there are lots of men out there who would be shocked and pissed to be treated in the way you describe, and lots of women who would join right in.Some, but they are the vast minority. Guys are, without malice, as mean and nasty to each other as they can think to be as a game. As bonding. There are exceptions to every rule, but in general it's safer to assume that men and women are different.
Fuck you bitch, I'm not sexist.
Seriously though, what I'm saying is that treating women with respect, which IS WHAT SHOULD BE DONE, is different from how most guys treat each other - IE, disrespectfully.
Context is everything. Maybe I read your post to Droll incorrectly, but it looked like you were calling her a bitch for real, which is why the edit and 0 point warning. If you want to discuss it further, there's a conversation open for it already. We can take it there.Since when?! Bitch.
I'm generally happy to ignore it, and I honestly didn't really feel the need to comment until articles about it were splashed across the front page of CNN several days in a row.I can understand some geek reactions, though. Some of them are socially unable to interact with women and they do feel threatened at the influx into their hobby. You can't just jump into their playground, and tell them to change. Even if they wanted to, some them wouldn't be able to change.
Their actions may still be inexcusable, but at some point you do have to simply ignore what one subset of the community is doing, and enjoy the parts that are worthwhile for you.
Very well, let me amend "ANY woman" to "EVERY." As in, the default. That was what I was going for.A lot of women are like that. Some women aren't. What I took exception to was the "ANY woman" part of your statement because, yeah, a woman's sense of humor can be just as varied as a man's. I'm sure there are lots of men out there who would be shocked and pissed to be treated in the way you describe, and lots of women who would join right in.
Eh, I have found that there is, in general, a very disproportionate level in the amount one gender is willing to put up with of that sort of nonsense as opposed to the other.While you and your friends may treat each other a certain way that would be shockingly disrespectful if directed toward strangers, am I wrong in assuming that these actions come from a place of respect? Do you have to reach a certain level in your friendship before such shenanigans commence? If I was -- to use your previous example -- gaming with a friend and he used those words to me, I'd laugh and tell him to fuck off because the context of the situation is very different than, say, if that same friend and I were in a legitimate argument and those words were said in anger and meant to hurt. Gender has nothing to do with it.
I particularly like the insinuation that if she didn't like being called a gendered insult, that proves his point and women really are just unable to be one of the boys.Context is everything. Maybe I read your post to Droll incorrectly, but it looked like you were calling her a bitch for real, which is why the edit and 0 point warning. If you want to discuss it further, there's a conversation open for it already. We can take it there.
I wasn't, and I don't think she thought I was either. I don't think it needs further discussion, and you ought to know by now I don't care about warnings.[DOUBLEPOST=1343419137][/DOUBLEPOST]Context is everything. Maybe I read your post to Droll incorrectly, but it looked like you were calling her a bitch for real, which is why the edit and 0 point warning. If you want to discuss it further, there's a conversation open for it already. We can take it there.
Any empirical study of its useage, especially in gaming, will show you that bitch is not an insult exclusive to one gender.I particularly like the insinuation that if she didn't like being called a gendered insult, that proves his point and women really are just unable to be one of the boys.
Neither is "rape" or "fag", but these aren't acceptable either.Any empirical study of its useage, especially in gaming, will show you that bitch is not an insult exclusive to one gender.
I made no assertion other than gender. And it speaks even more to my point - while I personally don't bandy those about and usually my friends do not also, there are lots of guys out there who do, and from their point of view it only became an issue when girls started "intruding." <--- (this is not defending them)Neither is "rape" or "fag", but these aren't acceptable either.
let's find out!I wasn't, and I don't think she thought I was either. I don't think it needs further discussion, and you ought to know by now I don't care about warnings.[DOUBLEPOST=1343419137][/DOUBLEPOST]
Any empirical study of its useage, especially in gaming, will show you that bitch is not an insult exclusive to one gender.
I don't even know what gender you ARE, but already I can tell you're a little wonderful lady. That study starts from a presupposition that bitch is gendered use. You basically just tried to prove creationism to me by quoting the bible.let's find out!
http://lin.ca/Uploads/cclr11/CCLR11-28.pdf
"Third, a significant finding of this study was that there was also evidence
that gendered violence was not just part of the game content, but was also experience by
the female gamers as described by their experience of misogynistic and/or discriminatory
behaviors directed toward them because they are female players. This included sexually
derogatory or hateful comments towards female gamers (e.g. “suck my dick bitch, and go back to the kitchen”)"
I agree with you and in many ways, I act the same with my friends.Eh, I have found that there is, in general, a very disproportionate level in the amount one gender is willing to put up with of that sort of nonsense as opposed to the other.
You provided me a study that showed that girls are treated meaner because they are girls, which is not in dispute, as an assertion for something else.[DOUBLEPOST=1343421283][/DOUBLEPOST]I thought you liked empirical studies? Perhaps it was all a ruse to prove me as a foolish academic. You fell for, it Moonie! Hook, line, and gendered insult
I strategically sculpted a hot dog, put it on a sleeping friend's lips, and took some blurry pictures. There's a good example of a good way to end up in jail if the recipient had been female.I've thrown a $20 to a friend to dare him to do something stupid such as dance sexy in front of another guy... I'd never ask a girl friend to do that. No matter how cool they are...
Is it because the laws are too harsh on men who do that to women, or because the laws are not harsh enough on men who do that to men?I strategically sculpted a hot dog, put it on a sleeping friend's lips, and took some blurry pictures. There's a good example of a good way to end up in jail if the recipient had been female.
I provided examples that the use of gendered insults provide a vastly different experience for women than it does men. I don't have access to other EMPIRICAL research I've used because it is behind a paywall, but maybe I can find the abstract in a sociology database.You provided me a study that showed that girls are treated meaner because they are girls, which is not in dispute, as an assertion for something else.[DOUBLEPOST=1343421283][/DOUBLEPOST]
From a logical standpoint, I suppose, the latter.Is it because the laws are too harsh on men who do that to women, or because the laws are not harsh enough on men who do that to men?
That is all irrelevant to my assertion, which is (without any commentary on whether it's right or acceptable or not) that to a great many guys, and a majority of them online, "bitch" is an all-purpose go-to insult that doesn't have gender association in the mind of the user. Now, you can argue that how it is received by their targets differs along gender lines, and I won't disagree. And you can think I'm full of it all you like. It hardly places you in the minority around here, and you would be, of course, just as wrong as the rest of them.I provided examples that the use of gendered insults provide a vastly different experience for women than it does men. I don't have access to other EMPIRICAL research I've used because it is behind a paywall, but maybe I can find the abstract in a sociology database.
But until you can provide me with a study that proves gendered language is made neuter online, divorce of any implicit or explicit association with women than I think you are full of it!
future response:
It is okay to call people bitch (cf: rage comic; reddit, 2010)
thank you for reading this sociology chat, if you enjoyed this sociology chat, press 1 now to read about the intervention dynamics of small volunteer groups.
I'm not gonna fall for it, people. I'm not going to keep reading this thread. Nope.
Nope.
View attachment 7389
My friend passed out from drinking. In the middle of the night, I put his hand inside warm water and let mother nature take its course. Then I hid the water and let him deal with it.I strategically sculpted a hot dog, put it on a sleeping friend's lips, and took some blurry pictures. There's a good example of a good way to end up in jail if the recipient had been female.
this is a really dumb attitude to haveIn all of this, though, I must say I am taking the word of actual individual women who are considered "geeky" before I give much weight to what the guys here have to say. So when THEY say Gas is wrong...
So you'd take a white guy's attitudes over a black guy's when it comes to race relations? Or a christian's over a muslim's on the topic of religious discrimination in America?[DOUBLEPOST=1343426762][/DOUBLEPOST]And weren't you one of the guys saying that a panel of celibate old white guys talking about reproductive rights of women was stupid?this is a really dumb attitude to have
Making laws about health concerns that they literally don't have is different than trying to explain privilege and gendered insults, etc etc]And weren't you one of the guys saying that a panel of celibate old white guys talking about reproductive rights of women was stupid?
MY DEADBEAT SON!I do a pretty funny impression of a geeky dude as informed by cartoon Ryan Scott.
Once again Frank know's what I'm sayin'.
I know why it rains.Of course, she also believed that putting a snake skin on a barbed wire fence was guaranteed, guaranteed to make it rain. As in, this was a proven physical law that was beyond question. So.
I'll be honest I would not be cool with going to a female herpetologist.I used to work with a lady who said she refused to have a male doctor because there was no possible way for a man, not even a doctor, to know what was going on in a woman's body because he didn't "have the right parts inside." I incredulously asked her, "so you think all male gynecologists are just legalized charlatans?" Trying to illustrate the absurdity of her stance, and she replied, "Yep!"
Ahahaha you are awful at everythingI'll answer that question, Droll, if you answer me another one.
Why/how is it, that geek girls only seem to come in two varieties? The same is, up to a point, true for male geeks as well, but I find it much more pronounced in women. You have the ugly-fat-weat-stained-don't-want-to-go-near-with-a-ten-foot-pole type (who are usually awesome and very caring and fun), and you get the so-hot-it's-not-fair-they'-re-also-smart variety (who, in the case of those I know, when nerd, also turn out to be nice. Dammit! I do know why I always crush on geek girls, admittedly, it seems to be 90% of women who are smart, intelligent and hot at the same time are geeks )
Anyway, besides the entitlement and idiocy of the masses, I think there's also another thing atp lay here - mostly unconscious. Men (a lot of, but not all, women too) want/need a hobby where they can "be themselves". Be it football, coin collecting, D&D, a rock band, going to war or whatever - men have always had/gone and looked for hobbies where they're not under watch of their significant other and/or being judged by people of the other gender. I think a lot of male geeks feel threatened by women coming to their hobby. Female sports fans are often met with similar issues.
There are doctors that specialize only in herpes?I'll be honest I would not be cool with going to a female herpetologist.
And why not?There are doctors that specialize only in herpes?
I'm guessing there are much different reasons you are/would get stared at by manchildren while you're walking around a convention. "Does she REALLY like this stuff?" may be a thought they're having, but it's probably pretty far down the list.Gas wasn't talking about the average, though. I jumped on him because he said "If I treat ANY woman how I treat my male friends... etc."
There are definitely pronounced differences between genders; I'm not questioning that or trying to say "lawl I'm a dude." What I oppose is the idea that being a geek is a boys' club and that women have to prove themselves to gain membership, which is basically what the CNN article was purporting, or that there are areas that should be at all restricted (gaming being a primary one) because women can't "handle it"; the fact that men are more likely than women to be felons has zero to do with being able to walk around a convention without getting the side-eye from manchildren wondering if I'm only there to "satisfy my hollow ego."
You know, I would have thought so too, but the CNN article and its subsequent responses made me sorta wonder.I'm guessing there are much different reasons you are/would get stared at by manchildren while you're walking around a convention. "Does she REALLY like this stuff?" may be a thought they're having, but it's probably pretty far down the list.
I am taller than I think...All I got out of your post is that I'm a male with a female height.
:cries:
You're just hating on her because she's a geek girl. You're just like all the rest.A horse god dammit!
That it's just nice to see Blossom acting again?ITT: Male nerds feel about female nerds the way that I feel about the Big Bang Theory.
As a person who is quite frequently targeted for discrimination because of my gender, I have to say that yes, I do find it stupid. I hold no expectations that it will go away any time soon, though.But you do at least realize how fucking stupid this is, right? Especially when someone is targeted for her gender?
Lots of marginalized groups adopt the pejorative terms and co-opt them in order to take control of their image. Yankee. Gay. There are others. Further, geek may have been pejorative when and where your grew up, but it's certainly not a pejorative now in the larger culture of the US.Why would anyone willingly associate themselves with a pejorative label to begin with?
And once I realized how you were interpreting that, I amended it to make it clearer. Funny though how everybody else knew what I was saying.Gas wasn't talking about the average, though. I jumped on him because he said "If I treat ANY woman how I treat my male friends... etc."
Yeah... but I'm not sure a lot of men would be OK with being treated how he treats his male friends, either. If you did a survey, more men than women would undoubtedly get a kick out of being called a cock-guzzling whatever, but a sizable percentage of the population would not.He was, just not very well.
He's citing examples from the extreme end of the spectrum (like pointing to the tallest men in the distribution of men) to support his position of the average. It is a flawed argument to an extent. Basically he's pointing out a part of the distribution to which women won't inhabit (there are no women as tall as the tallest men) but this approach is still somewhat misleading since it doesn't acknowledge the overlap in distributions.Yeah... but I'm not sure a lot of men would be OK with being treated how he treats his male friends, either. If you did a survey, more men than women would undoubtedly get a kick out of being called a cock-guzzling whatever, but a sizable percentage of the population would not.
Say what you will, but Mayim Bialik has to be among the top 5 geekiest living actresses, possibly even in the top 3. I would be utterly shocked to find otherwise.That it's just nice to see Blossom acting again?
I'd say probably number 1, really. How many actresses have their Ph.D. s in neuroscience?Say what you will, but Mayim Bialik has to be among the top 5 geekiest living actresses, possibly even in the top 3. I would be utterly shocked to find otherwise.
--Patrick
What the heck does education have to do with geekiness?I'd say probably number 1, really. How many actresses have their Ph.D. s in neuroscience?
Some people learned to spell fantasy from Sega.
That explains this:And some people have English as their fourth language.
Also, I'm out. I can already tell this is yet another thread where people will joyfully misinterpret what I say until they can paint me as a misogynist/rape apologist/anti-women/whatever, and I'm frankly quite sick of it.
This board has some weird ways of having a conversation.
I'm not saying I think you're a mysogynist/anti-women/whatever. But consider this: if everyone always seems to misinterpret what you say, across different threads, across different days and weeks, maybe you should think about how clearly you are communicating. Which is easier to believe: everyone misinterprets what you say, or that you aren't doing an effective job at expressing your position accurately?
I only say "top 3" because I don't know enough about other actresses to know if there's anyone else on par.I'd say probably number 1, really. How many actresses have their Ph.D. s in neuroscience?
Depends on if we're playing a game or not. Undoubtedly bad things would happen were I to walk up on the street to random strangers and start flinging invective.Yeah... but I'm not sure a lot of men would be OK with being treated how he treats his male friends, either. If you did a survey, more men than women would undoubtedly get a kick out of being called a cock-guzzling whatever, but a sizable percentage of the population would not.
I'd say probably number 1, really. How many actresses have their Ph.D. s in neuroscience?
I play The Secret WorldI'm back at playing CoH since no one was playing Secret World.
That works more on a sexism angle than what this is about, so I see what you mean.Critical Miss attempts to address this issue today. While the sentiment is laudable, the execution is flawed.
Just read through the thread... and I see that geekdom is apparently serious business.
Maybe this is just a reaction to the fact that being a geek/nerd/connoisseur of [insert fandom here] has pretty much gone mainstream. You have awesome sci-fi shows, you have movies like Lord of the Rings, TV series like The Game of Thrones, huge-ass sales of video games, millions worldwide playing WoW... It's no longer an instant social suicide to be considered a geek, and some people in the nerd community might feel threatened by it. Whether due to a sense of elitism or actual fear of social interaction, your guess is as good as mine.
Also, as a non-native speaker I'd like to point out that I use the terms 'nerd' and 'geek' interchangeably. There's only word roughly translating those in Finnish, so I hear no distinction between the two... though I understand that some consider one of them a pejorative even today?
As for geeks of the female gender... Heck, I know a lot of 'em and welcome them. Though I must admit not having seen much of the "ugly girl geek" stereotype you folks keep mentioning. Most nerd ladies I know are actually quite attractive. Were it not for my medical condition, I would actually be hitting on one of the people in my current game group. She's an enthusiastic beginner in tabletop gaming, an avid amateur actor and studying to become a teacher... and single, if I've understood correctly.
And it seems I'm rambling again...
Mate. Unless they play Dwarf Fortress, without the tilesets, then they aren't nearly as real as I am.The elitism is the big thing. The people having trouble with the influx are essentially geek hipsters, or the "I knew about that before everyone else" guy from Shortpacked.
They're getting the attention these days, so I suppose they're the one everyone is trying to dethrone.are nerds the new jocks?
They're getting the attention these days, so I suppose they're the one everyone is trying to dethrone.
Soon there will be movies about how jocks heroically overthrow their nerd masters and everyone will be totally cool with that.
--Patrick
And then one of the Jocks will rape one of the nerd's girlfriends, and she'll not only be ok with it, but will instantly fall in love with him.They're getting the attention these days, so I suppose they're the one everyone is trying to dethrone.
Soon there will be movies about how jocks heroically overthrow their nerd masters and everyone will be totally cool with that.
--Patrick