As I noted, my problems with how it's sung are personal taste. I still think it could've been presented better for such a crucial scene, but there's nothing wrong with the song itself. I'm sure someday someone will do a cover that I'll love.For me, "Let it Go" was one of the finest Disney songs we've had in quite awhile. That you're not a fan of Idina Menzel likely plays a major role in your general distaste for the song. Personally, I loved it because it starts out slow and then gradually builds until she's full-on diva, belting out the number at the top of her lungs, like it's a huge coming out party for her acceptance of her situation (and powers). For that alone, some people are saying it's a quasi-allegory to someone in the LGBT community coming out. I'd say that's arguable, but there's enough there to argue in its favour.
Found one for ya.As I noted, my problems with how it's sung are personal taste. I still think it could've been presented better for such a crucial scene, but there's nothing wrong with the song itself. I'm sure someday someone will do a cover that I'll love.
I was wondering that too. It's a lot easier to tell a simple love story well that kids can understand than to tell more complex, layered ones about family relationships ... I guess? Lilo and Stitch did it great. So did How to Train Your Dragon. Those are just off the top of my head; I'm sure there are other examples.Though I enjoyed the movie, I felt like it was all over the place sometimes. Looking back at the animated films that have attempted to give the female protagonist a bit more depth and character, I wonder if writers are struggling with creating a story filled with complex people that still appeals to children. I know it is also one of those films that went through a lot of production hell like Brave, but I just wonder if that plays a part at all.
I thought deeper voice too.As for "Let it Go," I love Idina Menzel's voice, and the character's expressions during the song really touch me. I do feel like the voice didn't match up with the look of the character sometimes. I imagined that character with a deeper voice, I guess.
I don't think it was as bad as Brave in terms of production, but it was one of those that was proposed somewhere back in the 90s and it took forever to get off the ground. So it might've been a bit "overcooked."I didn't know Frozen had a hellish behind the scenes like Brave--that explains a lot, because I had the same feeling while watching it as I did while watching Brave, like the script needed another draft, but they didn't have time, and there were competing visions as to how the movie should be.
Given your comment about recent Disney movies getting away from this, is this an inherent problem with the Disney musical style that you also have with a bunch of the older Disney classics(Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin)? Or are you saying that it's a matter of execution where you feel Frozen falls behind?The songs came out of nowhere much of the time. It felt like the people doing the screenplay had almost no contact with the people writing the songs. It felt like "Hi, I'm a character AND HERE'S MY SONG okay, back to what we were doing," as opposed to developing characters or moving the story forward. Recent Disney movies have gotten away from the kinds of songs that just interrupt the pacing and this felt like a huge step back. "Let It Go" was one of the times I felt the song made sense to be at that moment, but Olaf's song, the troll song, Hans and Anna's song, the building a snowman song ... ugh. I liked a couple of those songs, especially Olaf's, but their placement was bizarre. I'm glad the movie got away from this in the third act or we would've had the awkward "running-singing-gotta get there in time but sing about it" way overdone climax of Pocahontas.
I'd have to re-watch some of the older Disney movies to go point for point, song for song, because you'll have songs where they feel like they have a purpose or at least the moment is right for a song versus having a song for the sake of having a song. No movie is all one or all the other. Even Tangled, which I love, had one that felt dropped in.Given your comments about recent Disney movies getting away from this, is this an inherent problem with the Disney musical style that you also have with a bunch of the older Disney classics(Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin)? Or are you saying that it's a matter of execution where you feel Frozen falls behind?
There did need to be a montage there and a song can help that move along. The way it comes in is sudden.Alright, in that case including "Do you want to build a snowman" on that list really feels off to me then (the others I agree or disagree with you to varying extents). It's a song that covers the time lapse between past and present and establishes both Anna's and Elsa's relationship in the aftermath of the incident and Anna's personality, that seems about as far from one of those songs they just pop in and breaks up the pacing as you can get to me.
I don't think it's been said here that all movies have to follow certain rules, so I don't know what you're referring to. There are many methods to making a story work, a character, etc. Sometimes movie makers do old cliches and they work. Sometimes they don't. Sometimes movie makers try new things and they work. Sometimes they don't. Sometimes they get lazy and it shows. Sometimes it works anyway. Most of the time you have a movie with both good and bad in it.I always wonder why some people seem to think that all movies have to follow certain rules. You can't have a character from the past that doesn't connect with the past. Etc.
If I like it, then I like it; if I don't like it, then I don't like it. Don't ask why, don't discuss things.I mean if I enjoy the film that's all that matters right?
Aaaand now I've shown her the "Let It Go" baby version and she's wandering around the apartment singing "let it doe, let it DOE".
Thanks a bunch, Nick.
*clears throat menacingly*
(I'm honestly surprised your main squeeze doesn't just join us on the forums. From the things you've told me about her, she'd fit right in.)
Wellll...the "people see a lot of crap, so I understand how they might not care about the problems" comes off a bit of shitting on those who like it, since it sounds like you're saying they don't actually know what's good like you do. Speaking as someone who's recently watched Tangled (one of the much better movies you mentioned sandwiching Frozen between), I'd say Frozen is at least as good, if not better. But that's me. You're entitled to your thoughts on what worked and what didn't, and I respect that, but I hope you don't think those of us who liked it only did so because we don't know anything better.If I like it, then I like it; if I don't like it, then I don't like it. Don't ask why, don't discuss things.
I think you know that I'm not Charlie--I'm not saying people shouldn't like the movie. Notice that Dubyaman's post was pretty much "I like this, I like that" and I didn't respond to it? Because the only thing up for discussion from that is whether he liked the movie and there is nothing to discuss about that. Those are his feelings. Like I said in my OP, on a future viewing, I might be able to look past these problems more than I do now and like the movie a little more. But the problems still exist. Like I also said in my OP, people with kids end up seeing a lot of garbage regularly, so their tolerance threshold for problems is pretty low. Back when I was babysitting and my cousins wanted to watch the same Spongebob Squarepants episode and then Cinderella 2 over and over, even Pocahontas seemed like a godsend.
Julie popped in to point out that people not immersed in stories and analyzing stories aren't going to find analyzing of stories/movies/etc. to be a subject of merit. I could've sat and analyzed why Wreck-It Ralph is a great movie with the same detail as analyzing why Frozen isn't, but I didn't feel it necessary. This felt necessary because I really wanted to like Frozen, but I couldn't get past all the problems I see in it, and I want to discuss it. I'm not shitting on anyone else liking the movie though.
No, no. You don't know any better. >:3Wellll...the "people see a lot of crap, so I understand how they might not care about the problems" comes off a bit of shitting on those who like it, since it sounds like you're saying they don't actually know what's good like you do. Speaking as someone who's recently watched Tangled (one of the much better movies you mentioned sandwiching Frozen between), I'd say Frozen is at least as good, if not better. But that's me. You're entitled to your thoughts on what worked and what didn't, and I respect that, but I hope you don't think those of us who liked it only did so because we don't know anything better.
No.No, no. You don't know any better. >:3
Your paraphrasing entirely changes what I said.Wellll...the "people see a lot of crap, so I understand how they might not care about the problems" comes off a bit of shitting on those who like it, since it sounds like you're saying they don't actually know what's good like you do. Speaking as someone who's recently watched Tangled (one of the much better movies you mentioned sandwiching Frozen between), I'd say Frozen is at least as good, if not better. But that's me. You're entitled to your thoughts on what worked and what didn't, and I respect that, but I hope you don't think those of us who liked it only did so because we don't know anything better.
There's a difference between expressing it in words and saying exactly what it is. It's lazy to have the characters say "I feel this way" instead of having them act in a way that represents it. It's lazy to say "Hey audience, these characters are in love" instead of having them act in ways that make it clear they're in love.Well to analyze, I think that Wreck-It-Ralph and Frozen are two entirely different movies in terms of format. For example the guys with from that Critical Hit video compared the two in terms of expression. Frozen has to sing the word "fear" to show the audience she's scared, while Wreck It Ralph can do it without works. Well I think the biggest difference that wasn't considered is that one is a musical and one isn't. Musicals DO express their feelings through words/song. That's the point.
Oh yeah, all of that is complete fucking nonsense.This discussion is really refreshing. I keep seeing Frozen stuff on Tumblr, and my God, it has broken down into such wretched social justice bullshit it can actually trigger a migraine.
You're in good company.I thought Gravity was also terrible, but when I say that I get the same reactions.
I liked some of the music and didn't like other of the music.It's ok to not like Frozen. I came out of it feeling pretty meh, though unlike you I like the music. I thought Gravity was also terrible, but when I say that I get the same reactions.
There's a difference between expressing it in words and saying exactly what it is. It's lazy to have the characters say "I feel this way" instead of having them act in a way that represents it. It's lazy to say "Hey audience, these characters are in love" instead of having them act in ways that make it clear they're in love.
and defend it from some of the criticism I've seen with another breakdown, since I can't fall back on "I liked it".This discussion is really refreshing. I keep seeing Frozen stuff on Tumblr, and my God, it has broken down into such wretched social justice bullshit it can actually trigger a migraine.
I thought about that too. It would've created some nice character growth, for Anna to realize this accident has happened before, and let her know exactly what went down that made Elsa have to be secluded.You know the one thing that bugged me?Why did Pabbie/Grandpa never mention he met Anna before? He couldn't have taken, what, 2 seconds to mention he warned her parents about the danger of Elsa hitting the heart? Or erasing her memories?
Sorry, Bubble181, but I gave like three warnings .
I thought about that too. It would've created some nice character growth, for Anna to realize this accident has happened before, and let her know exactly what went down that made Elsa have to be secluded.
He didn't mention it. The scene did the "you're in love" bit, then the troll king explained the frozen heart issue, and then they went off to Hans. Kristof didn't bother. It was weird.That's what I was thinking. It would have been an "Aha!" moment for Anna, and probably given her a little more insight to her sister.
And now that I'm thinking about it...Why didn't Kristoff mention it? He witnessed the whole thing when he was a kid, and I don't remember them erasing his memory. Or did they and I just forgot?
He made a comment, but didn't give Anna any context and troll king didn't explain what had happened. I suppose Anna could've found out off-screen, but there's no indication of that. As far as the movie shows, she never finds out her memories were messed with or what really happened.Didn't he make a comment on how they fixed it before?
I didn't realize he was an orphan until he said the trolls took him and Sven in. At the beginning of the movie I just assumed he was the son or apprentice to one of the ice merchants.One thing that also irritated me was Kristof's backstory. Was he just a random orphan tagging along with ice merchants and no one gave a shit that he ended up getting raised by trolls? It was confusing.
HAH! Talk about. I can't sing along (well) with a lot of awesome Disney songs.Disney songs are tough on altos.
That was the part I was waiting for that never came. It kind of felt like the movie was rapidly heading in that direction but then the clutch gave out and it just kind of.. coasted to a stop.Lastly, it would have been more interesting if Elsa actually became bad, or dare I say it - evil. Instead the movie merely conveys that she's running away, with bad consequences, but still cares for the people who arguably are the reason she's suffering in the first place. She only gets to "I'm free!" and never makes it to "Why should I have been made to suffer?" Perhaps she didn't have enough time to become bitter, but the fact that people were after her and attempting to kill her should have changed her mind. Wouldn't it have been more interesting is she had become a full-on villain, and her sister was able to save her (or make good on her emotional divorcement by banishing her) through what would have required significantly more effort and perseverance than the film did? But I suspect you couldn't give justice to this sort of story in such a short film.
You bring up an interesting point, but thinking back on it, I think the path they chose for Elsa actually makes her a more unique, and strangely, realistic character. We'd expect her to become full-on evil from those circumstances because it's become a cliche for villain origins. More often than not, if the villain doesn't start out as "evil", they become so because they've decided to lash out at those around them that made them feel isolated/unwanted/etc. They become evil out of vengeance. But Elsa continued to internalize the blame/guilt, in no small part due to short-sighted planning on the part of her parents (as you pointed out). Even when she was "free" and used her powers in a fantastic way, she still viewed them as a burden once another person was around. She couldn't bring herself to see that she had a gift rather than a shameful secret that must never be used around people. I think that this is an extremely realistic response. I've known a number of people (both in my personal life and in Halforums) that have been so emotionally affected by events of their past than no matter how much they achieve, they still doubt their own self worth. I think on one hand, it would have been good for Elsa to be empowered, even if it meant becoming evil, but on the other hand, I think making her emotionally vulnerable made her more relatable instead of cartoonishly villainous.Lastly, it would have been more interesting if Elsa actually became bad, or dare I say it - evil. Instead the movie merely conveys that she's running away, with bad consequences, but still cares for the people who arguably are the reason she's suffering in the first place. She only gets to "I'm free!" and never makes it to "Why should I have been made to suffer?" Perhaps she didn't have enough time to become bitter, but the fact that people were after her and attempting to kill her should have changed her mind. Wouldn't it have been more interesting is she had become a full-on villain, and her sister was able to save her (or make good on her emotional divorcement by banishing her) through what would have required significantly more effort and perseverance than the film did? But I suspect you couldn't give justice to this sort of story in such a short film.
I was able to see Frozen and liked it. "Let it Go" is definitely one of my new favorite songs, though I was able to see a lot of the similarities in it and Elphaba's "Bring Me Down" from Wicked (being sung by the same person helped too).You bring up an interesting point, but thinking back on it, I think the path they chose for Elsa actually makes her a more unique, and strangely, realistic character. We'd expect her to become full-on evil from those circumstances because it's become a cliche for villain origins. More often than not, if the villain doesn't start out as "evil", they become so because they've decided to lash out at those around them that made them feel isolated/unwanted/etc. They become evil out of vengeance. But Elsa continued to internalize the blame/guilt, in no small part due to short-sighted planning on the part of her parents (as you pointed out). Even when she was "free" and used her powers in a fantastic way, she still viewed them as a burden once another person was around. She couldn't bring herself to see that she had a gift rather than a shameful secret that must never be used around people. I think that this is an extremely realistic response. I've known a number of people (both in my personal life and in Halforums) that have been so emotionally affected by events of their past than no matter how much they achieve, they still doubt their own self worth. I think on one hand, it would have been good for Elsa to be empowered, even if it meant becoming evil, but on the other hand, I think making her emotionally vulnerable made her more relatable instead of cartoonishly villainous.
but the reality is that it is a great movie.
It's also not a very deep story emotionally. It has a lot of emotion, there's no doubt there, but the emotions aren't very complex.
no one really changed in the movie.
But she doesn't change, not really, and she's the film's protagonist.
Elsa's backstory is the kind that can breed a Batman villain. It felt exactly as you said, that they were going that way up to a point and then just wussed out on it. I doubt they could get a G rating had they gone that route--it would've been considered a mature theme--but like I said in the OP, it would've given more emotional strength and character dynamic to the sisters for Elsa to go anti-social "frost and ruin on you all!" and then Anna still is willing to sacrifice herself to save her sister.That was the part I was waiting for that never came. It kind of felt like the movie was rapidly heading in that direction but then the clutch gave out and it just kind of.. coasted to a stop.
I think they could've had her fall and yet come back from it. Her parents may have already been expecting that considering they already had hand-enclosing manacles in the castle dungeon when the frozen landscape would've made it unlikely anyone forged them new.You bring up an interesting point, but thinking back on it, I think the path they chose for Elsa actually makes her a more unique, and strangely, realistic character. We'd expect her to become full-on evil from those circumstances because it's become a cliche for villain origins. More often than not, if the villain doesn't start out as "evil", they become so because they've decided to lash out at those around them that made them feel isolated/unwanted/etc. They become evil out of vengeance. But Elsa continued to internalize the blame/guilt, in no small part due to short-sighted planning on the part of her parents (as you pointed out). Even when she was "free" and used her powers in a fantastic way, she still viewed them as a burden once another person was around. She couldn't bring herself to see that she had a gift rather than a shameful secret that must never be used around people. I think that this is an extremely realistic response. I've known a number of people (both in my personal life and in Halforums) that have been so emotionally affected by events of their past than no matter how much they achieve, they still doubt their own self worth. I think on one hand, it would have been good for Elsa to be empowered, even if it meant becoming evil, but on the other hand, I think making her emotionally vulnerable made her more relatable instead of cartoonishly villainous.
That's almost exactly what my wife said on the drive home from the theater.Having watched it three times, he doesn't leave a single hint, however it's obvious in hindsight. Twelve brothers, looking for a home he can call his own, it sounds like he's just echoing her, but he actually feels these things himself. It's just that he's in it for blood, and his behavior doesn't suggest that until the scene by the fire.
Also, Celt Z, thank you for digging into the movie to say good about it.
You did make me see the Elsa villain thing differently and with reason. My wife thought it was a good point too.You're welcome! I walked away from it feeling more excited than I had after seeing a (non-Pixar) Disney movie in a long time, Enchanted and Wreck-It Ralph coming the closest. I was sorry to hear you didn't enjoy it at first, but everyone's allowed an opinion. It's not a flawless movie, but I don't think one exists. But I do like hearing other people's analysis on a film's strengths and weaknesses, especially when they're willing to hear others' interpretations also. It just gets under my skin when discussions like this become absolutes, as though there's only one "right" way to view the movie.
It's not like we're talking about steak here.
Holy freaking creepy! It's giving me shivers - the entire music tone is so different. It definately sounds like something right out of a horror movie - like Anna's waiting outside of Elsa's door with a meat cleaver or something.Is it possible to not care for a movie but really love its fandom?
Someone was messing with "Do you want to build a snowman?" and ended up with this. It's fucking creepy (and hilarious) and culls up an alternate universe where Anna freezes to death and comes back as an ice wight or something.
"Elsa, I know you're in there"
Sorry.I went into the movie excited, came away disappointed, analyzed to see why and found problems. I'm going to give it another chance someday, but in starting this discussion, I was curious if someone would analyze and find something I missed, something that would help me see it differently, rather than "the problems you see aren't really problems" or "well I liked it".
Is it possible to not care for a movie but really love its fandom?
Someone was messing with "Do you want to build a snowman?" and ended up with this. It's fucking creepy (and hilarious) and culls up an alternate universe where Anna freezes to death and comes back as an ice wight or something.
"Elsa, I know you're in there"
That's fucking awesome.Is it possible to not care for a movie but really love its fandom?
Someone was messing with "Do you want to build a snowman?" and ended up with this. It's fucking creepy (and hilarious) and culls up an alternate universe where Anna freezes to death and comes back as an ice wight or something.
"Elsa, I know you're in there"
And speaking of Frozen... as I'm shoveling my back porch this morning, the first thing that popped into my head was "Someone must have pissed off Elsa!". The snow is up to my knees, and since I'm not short, that's a good amount of snow!
Hey now, this is Halforums. They're never useless, we love them all!http://io9.com/cast-of-frozen-sings-for-fans-live-and-heres-why-th-1520159957
The trolls were completely useless...
What?! We need to contact the proper authorities! Alert the media! THIS IS NOT A DRILL, PEOPLE!
Pretty sure gay kids were able to find Frozen on their own, if Tumblr is any indication.
I didn't even have to watch the video. I started laughing as soon as the still loaded.TeamFourStar has gotten in on the parody bandwagon with "Do You Want to Kill a Planet?".
http://teamfourstar.com/video/want-kill-planet-frozen-parody-3/
There's a difference between expressing it in words and saying exactly what it is. It's lazy to have the characters say "I feel this way" instead of having them act in a way that represents it. It's lazy to say "Hey audience, these characters are in love" instead of having them act in ways that make it clear they're in love.
Even musically, "there's so much fear" is a lazy lyric. Imagine if the Beauty and the Beast songs "Something There" and "Beauty and the Beast" went something like "They might love each other" and "Now they love each other" respectively.
That might not make much difference for you, but for me, the Critical Hit video nailed it when they said (paraphrasing) that if you just tell me something, I'm not feeling it. I went into Frozen expecting to have a good time and wanting to like. I don't sit there analyzing the movie while watching it or marking up a checklist. I just watch the movie. If I feel some disconnect, or don't feel anything though, it's going to sour the experience, and afterward I wonder why, and start analyzing to figure it out. Was it me? Was it the movie? A little of both?
Like I said in the OP, if I felt Frozen was a bad movie, I'd just write it off and forget about it. But I'd be enjoying one scene and disconnected the next, and it was this jarring mix of good and bad that bugged me.
I feel your pain.I am watching this for the 4th time in 2 weeks. Kill meeeeeeee. (I like the movie, just not this much.)
I've seen plenty of Disney movies, if that's what you mean.Dude, have you ever been to a musical?
Looks like "Let It Go" is stuck in a lot of people's heads now and forever:
"Frozen" becomes highest-grossing animated film of all time
You know, I think that might have been the first gif I ever posted back on the oooooooold PvP forums.
Because some people have asked, no, that is not me in that gif. It does look a lot like me, though.I liked it.
I actually showed that gif to my mom, and she thought it was me......way to get our hopes up, 'Poe.
*zips up jeans*
Or the message is that even with access to true love from a guy, true love from a sister is just as good, maybe?I don't know why Kristof exists except to give Anna a man at the end, which is against the message in the movie.
It's not true love between her and Kristof. That was the point of his existence. They just met. There's an attraction, but they just met. That's why it was the bond between sisters that was true love, and broke the curse.Or the message is that even with access to true love from a guy, true love from a sister is just as good, maybe?
Otherwise, yeah, pacing issues with the plot.
Perhaps? I don't know; I'm not going to put any more time towards Frozen except for reposting funny shit from the fans.Finally got around to watching it today. Loved it to pieces.[DOUBLEPOST=1397328032,1397327970][/DOUBLEPOST]I think the fact that QP has never seen a real musical, much less like them pretty much explains exactly why he doesn't like it.
http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/blogs/frozens_shout_outs_to_arrested_development_in_gif_form-2013-12I made the ringtone when my wife calls "I mean it's crazy, what, we finish each others, sandehiches" part of the song and my normal ring tones do you wanna build a snowman
I think a lot of the plot problems were probably caused by something I discovered only recently, but apparently other people have known for months: originally, Elsa was going to be the villain after all. Producers ordered a story change upon hearing "Let It Go" and decided the song was too positive for a villain. I won't get into everything wrong-headed about changing a story for a song's sake or whether antagonists should be allowed to have layers and dimensions in children's movies, but the fact of this change tells me that they had to do a lot of editing and messing around, creating narratives bumps and stutters that wouldn't have existed if they'd spent that time tidying their original idea instead of having to flex it into a new one.I finally watched Frozen for the first time on the flight from Taiwan to London.
Then I watched it a second time. Then a third.
Then I watched it a fourth time on the way back.
Guys, I think I might like this movie.
Anyway, some thoughts:
1. I agree with a lot of the criticisms posted in this thread, actually. I think Frozen had some plot problems that could've been fixed with just a few additional lines and scenes. It would've added maybe five or ten minutes to the movie in total, which I don't think is a huge amount, and would've made everything fit together much better.
2. Jonathan Groff's horribly wasted in this movie. He gets one song, during which half his lines are done in a goofy voice. This guy was awesome on Glee and in Spring Awakening, it's a pity they didn't use him more.
3. Idina Menzel needs to do more emotion-filled duets. Seriously, her duets from Rent, Wicked, Glee, and Frozen all gave me tinglies in my nether bits.
Anna is the one who knocks.Still haven't seen the movie, but saw this on a podcast, thought people might like it.
Someone doesn't believe in love at first hike to find missing ice powered sister here....It's not true love between her and Kristof. That was the point of his existence. They just met. There's an attraction, but they just met. That's why it was the bond between sisters that was true love, and broke the curse.
Yes, Anna and Kristof are together at the end, but they aren't engaged or anything. They're dating, a normal relationship, instead of the the day romances into marriage that Disney had been known for.
Take Me or Leave Me is probably my favorite song from Rent.3. Idina Menzel needs to do more emotion-filled duets. Seriously, her duets from Rent, Wicked, Glee, and Frozen all gave me tinglies in my nether bits.
Well, since it's a classroom, presumably they'll have a chance to go Frozen-free soon.
Bleeeeeeehhhhhhh.I don't know if anyone watches Once Upon a Time (to be honest, I've only seen 2 episodes), but this was the teaser ending the other night. (You may want to skip ahead to 1:46)
Do you want a make a quick buck,I don't know if anyone watches Once Upon a Time (to be honest, I've only seen 2 episodes), but this was the teaser ending the other night. (You may want to skip ahead to 1:46)
Well, that looks awful.I don't know if anyone watches Once Upon a Time (to be honest, I've only seen 2 episodes), but this was the teaser ending the other night. (You may want to skip ahead to 1:46)
No, no, it may seem like Disney is bringing Frozen into Once Upon a Time in an awkward and money-grabbing decision, but they're actually bringing Darkwing Duck's universe in, starting oddly enough with the Liquidator.Well, that looks awful.
From what I understand, the special fx on OUAT usually look early-90's quality, not just this particular instance. But given the popularity of Frozen and the show is made to showcase Disney's properties? They'd be stupid NOT to bring her in.Well, that looks awful.
True story: I actually modeled my latest Skyrim character on Elsa. A Breton destruction mage specializing in ice magic, with platinum blonde hair.
Not sure if you're being cute, if you actually think that's her name, or if you're secretly John Travolta.I've probably heard Adele Dazeem's "Let it Go" probably 200+ times (twice a day) and I actually really like it.
Not sure if you're being cute, if you actually think that's her name, or if you're secretly John Travolta.
I am there with your friend's wife. It's an ok movie until you see it for the 50th time and have listened to the soundtrack on repeat, plus constant singing of the three main songs (Let It Go, For the First Time in Forever, and Do You Want to Build A Snowman). Then you start wishing you could go on a mass killing spree in Arendelle.It's all their 4 year old daughter ever wants to watch.
I've learned to never speak the words "Let it go" ever again. It always ends with a 9 year old singing that song.I am there with your friend's wife. It's an ok movie until you see it for the 50th time and have listened to the soundtrack on repeat, plus constant singing of the three main songs (Let It Go, For the First Time in Forever, and the reprise of For the First Time...). Then you start wishing you could go on a mass killing spree in Arendelle.
It amused me, but I won't be happy until
I liked that but:
Blonde hair --> very light eyebrows against pale skinI liked that but:
-Why doesn't she have eyebrows?
-Why the hell did her irises turn white without the makeuuuuuuuuuuup
You must mean "Olaf."that dude following him around with the two spray cans of snow?
Elsa's backstory is the kind that can breed a Batman villain. It felt exactly as you said, that they were going that way up to a point and then just wussed out on it. I doubt they could get a G rating had they gone that route--it would've been considered a mature theme--but like I said in the OP, it would've given more emotional strength and character dynamic to the sisters for Elsa to go anti-social "frost and ruin on you all!" and then Anna still is willing to sacrifice herself to save her sister.
Because she plucked them, and they're actually just make-up... as that's supposed to be attractive for some reason...-Why doesn't she have eyebrows?