If Tosh apologizes for a joke, you just KNOW it had to be way over the top. And yes, I know what he said.So comedian Daniel Tosh tries to channel Carlin, instead pulls a Mav. Louis CK sticks up for him.
I read about this.So comedian Daniel Tosh tries to channel Carlin, instead pulls a Mav. Louis CK sticks up for him.
YES! BRUTALITY AGAINST THIS WOMAN THAT DARED SPEAK UP AGAINST ME IS THE FUNNIEST GODDAMN THING IN THE WORLD!!I read that. I was incredibly disgusted by it. It wasn't much of an apology either. I mean, right after that 'apology' he said
Apparently you make that point by pointing at a woman in the audience and say it would be FUNNY if she was raped by five guys RIGHT NOW. HILARIOUS! I simply cannot contain my laughter!
And become "The Comedian!"I think John Stewart said it best: Just because your a comedian doesn't mean that you don't have to face responsibility for your actions.
Honestly, I like Daniel Tosh, but that really was in bad taste. He didn't say that to be funny, he said it intimidate someone. When your using your comedy as a weapon, you stop being a comic.
Basically. He tried to intimidate the woman by making her the target of the joke, instead of just telling her to leave. He knew what he was doing.As I said on the disqus, if he'd said "If you don't like my act, there's the door" I'd be sticking up for him. But he doubled down and went beyond the pale. What he did is indefensible.
True.I got called quite often on my teabagging my collegues and friends.This is what happens when some people stay online too long. They get away with shit behind anonymity and then it bleeds into their RL personality.
Basically. He tried to intimidate the woman by making her the target of the joke, instead of just telling her to leave. He knew what he was doing.
a forum member that made the same joke about a female forum member.Whats pulling a Mav?
...In a non-funny way.Attempting to be the biggest misogynistic asshat on the planet.
A-yu.That's the scary part. He was dead serious about it.
It's hilarious how often the phrase the phrase "Don't accuse me of blaming the victim" is followed by someone doing exactly that.Don't accuse me of blaming the victim, but the lady should have just kept her mouth shut, left the club, and then blogged about how offended she was. In a sense she pretty much dangled a piece of meat in front of a bear and then wondered why she got mauled.
yes...It's hilarious how often the phrase the phrase "Don't accuse me of blaming the victim" is followed by someone doing exactly that.
Well, in this case, you can just attribute, to me, the sentence "the victim probably asked for it".It's hilarious how often the phrase the phrase "Don't accuse me of blaming the victim" is followed by someone doing exactly that.
Thanks bro. That's exactly what I was going for.Well, in this case, you can just attribute, to me, the sentence "the victim probably asked for it".
Mind you, there's three options:
a) She wanted to get heckled in a funny way, and got this instead - dangling a piece of meat in front of a dog, and getting a big bite taken out of your leg when you just wanted to tease the animal and get a little nip -> That's just stupid on your part, even though perhaps the dog needs to be looked at and maybe put down for being too aggressive
b) She REALLY had no idea this guy was an offensive "comedian" who made jokes about offensive themes. In this case, getting up and fighting back is akin to trying to goad an animal into action, not knowing whether this animal is dangerous or not - it's stupid.
c) She came specifically to disrupt the performance. I don't have to explain why this one is bad, right?
Mind you, he crossed the line and was an offensive ass. Saying you'd like to see someone get raped? Not cool. It's not because party X overreacted that party Y is therefore not to blame at all.
Also mind you, I haven't watched the video in question since I'm at work.
I see this thread's going to get locked much sooner than the last Rant thread.
Mav didn't just make that joke, either. As evidenced by a certain Hall of Shame thread, he pretty much viewed women as a lesser class of people who don't know what they want (hint: they really want Mav).
Easily the second most disgusting person we've had on the forums.
Nope.Boy, I hope you're not referring to me as the first because of my views on the subject at hand.
He's clearly referring to AmE and her irrational hatred for the TLGB community.Boy, I hope you're not referring to me as the first because of my views on the subject at hand.
I think the argument is more often: It's comedy, you don't have the right to be not offended by it.It's sad to see how many people are defending him. "It's comedy. You cannot be offended because it is comedy. Period."
No, we're (probably) talking about Icarus (sp), the guy who admitted to sleeping with a 14 year old when he was 18+ and felt there was nothing wrong with it. Then proceeded to use every pedophile stereotype that exists in his posts to defend himself, including...Boy, I hope you're not referring to me as the first because of my views on the subject at hand.
Icarus is the bad guy.No, we're (probably) talking about Iaculus (sp), the guy who admitted to sleeping with a 14 year old when he was 18+ and felt there was nothing wrong with it. Then proceeded to use every pedophile stereotype that exists in his posts to defend himself, including...
- Age is a just a number
- This is modern standard. People used to do this all the time.
- She was very mature for her age.
- Many more.
We saved that thread in the Hall of Shame and it is both hilarious and disturbing.
Trust me. Your not even in the top 10 yet.
Yeah, I realized it right after I posted. Sorry IaculusIcarus is the bad guy.
Iaculus is the guy who keeps getting confused for Icarus and I feel bad for him whenever we do that.
I agree, if she didn't find the performance to her liking, she should have left. However, I also think he should have pointed that out to her instead of saying, literally, "Hey, wouldn't it be funny if she got, like, raped by 5 guys right now?"
Er, yeah, what dave said.
Have you got a link for that?Actually, from what I read, she made that up. He said something along the lines of "Whoa, it looks like someone got raped by like 5 guys at once..."
Doesn't really excuse it, but it's not quite as harsh.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/10/daniel-tosh-rape-joke-laugh-factory_n_1662882.htmlHave you got a link for that?
Ok, so the heckler's side is:
It might not be ironclad, but it's paraphrased close enough to the truth, by the sounds of it.And the rebuttal is the club owner saying:
"Daniel came in, and he said, 'Well it sounds like she’s been raped by five guys' — something like that. I really didn’t hear properly."
... that's not very ironclad. "something like that, I really didn't hear properly." It sounds more like a club owner trying to do damage control.
On the title: this is news?Spun the Tosh Talk off into its own thread. Let's keep the rant thread all ranty.
Pretty much this.There are literally hundreds of videos where comics go after hecklers. There's even a documentary about hecklers, called (imaginatively enough) Heckler. As someone who has BEEN heckled, you don't always know what to say right away. Oh, you have some shots and know what you'll say in some situations, but not all. In Tosh's case, he was doing misogynistic jokes and was heckled by a woman, so he went way, way, WAY over the top to humiliate her.
So here's my take - as a stand-up - about the whole thing.
Was she in the wrong? Yes. She should have known Tosh's brand of humor before going to the show. She had to buy a ticket and it's not like he's a road comedian nobody has ever heard of. She knew what she was getting into before she went. Also, when you go to a comedy show, SHUT THE FUCK UP! You don't like what you are hearing? Get up and leave. You want to heckle? Fuck you. You are a selfish and immature pissant who deserves to be stepped on, sometimes cruelly and with great malice.
Was Tosh in the wrong? Damn skippy. Like Michael Richards, he tried to take something negative and turn it into a positive, only to go too far around the bend and loop back into "WTF am I listening to" territory. But instead of owning up to it and stopping himself, he doubled down and went for it, which was a bad fucking idea. Tosh's problem is that his humor is ALL centered around shock and racism/sexism and when heckled he doesn't have much room to wiggle out of it because he's already on the edge of bad taste.
So I agree with everyone here for different reasons. I wouldn't have handled it the way he did but I can see why he did. Of course, I don't make rape jokes in the first place so I wouldn't go there even if prodded.
tl;dr: Tosh is an ass. The heckler is an ass. Nobody is surprised at any of it.
Ok, so the heckler's side is:
"After I called out to him, Tosh paused for a moment. Then, he says, 'Wouldn’t it be funny if that girl got raped by like, 5 guys right now? Like right now? What if a bunch of guys just raped her…' and I, completely stunned and finding it hard to process what was happening but knowing I needed to get out of there, immediately nudged my friend, who was also completely stunned, and we high-tailed it out of there. It was humiliating, of course, especially as the audience guffawed in response to Tosh, their eyes following us as we made our way out of there. I didn’t hear the rest of what he said about me."
I dunno, I haven't seen too many stand up comedians, but I loved when they went at hecklers. I thought that was when they tended to be at their funniest.Pretty much this.
I'm huge into the local comedy clubs and go at least once a month to their improv night on Fridays. Every once of a while, the skit bombs.... it happens.... comedians use smaller venues to test out new jokes for their bigger gigs. This is how I knew of some comedians before they hit it big like Russell Peters and Sugar Sammy.
What pisses me off is when pissants start to go "booo" "this sucks!!!" "this subject isn't funny"... it actually angers me and there has been more than once where I went to go see them after the skit and told them a piece of my mind. You don't like it? You and you 10$ can go fuck off. Who the fuck are you to judge someone else. If you don't like it, shut up. Wait for the next skit.
FFS
Hecklers deserves everything they get and more from comedians, they are scum that hide in a crowd of people and ruin it for others because "it's all about them"
Lol Icarus was not who I would have guessed you meant.Nope.
Who wants to tell the special Halforums version of the tale of Icarus?
Wow...Worst heckler I ever had? My wife. She was just yelling things from the crowd and I couldn't really fire back so I introduced her and worked it into my act. It actually went really well and was a good set. People thought we'd planned it but we hadn't. After it was over she and I had a chat. She doesn't do that any more.
Damn hippy.He had every right to make the jokes he did. She had every right to feel the way she did. She had every right to react to his jokes as she did. He had every right to respond to her the way he did. Everyone has every right to feel the way they currently do about the situation.
Freeze Zpeech.
Fuck it. If he was telling rape jokes, then she had every right to heckle him and say that rape is never funny.
use his position to frighten someone with the threat of sexual violence.
Doesn't sound like a threat to me.“Wouldn’t it be funny if that girl got raped by like, 5 guys right now? Like right now? What if a bunch of guys just raped her…”
Difference between "free speech (even if you're an idiot)" in the open, and "interrupting a paid performance". It'sn ot "free speech" to talk during a movie or spoil the plot, for example - that's just asshattishness. Same for the heckler (even though there, as well, the response was too strong). If the heckler had gone back home and made a very angry and bitter blogpost about Tosh being a tosser, it'd be quite something different from interrupting a performance and drawing the attention for....well, I don't know why.She asked for it, just like the heckler...
So the threat of gang rape is justified for letting a comedian know he's crossing the line.Difference between "free speech (even if you're an idiot)" in the open, and "interrupting a paid performance". It'sn ot "free speech" to talk during a movie or spoil the plot, for example - that's just asshattishness. Same for the heckler (even though there, as well, the response was too strong). If the heckler had gone back home and made a very angry and bitter blogpost about Tosh being a tosser, it'd be quite something different from interrupting a performance and drawing the attention for....well, I don't know why.
We're saying (at least what I've read) is that the heckler asked for it but got hit with a nuclear bomb of idiocy instead of the level she should have gotten. The fact that she was wrong does not absolve Tosh of his being super wrong as well.So the threat of gang rape is justified for letting a comedian know he's crossing the line.
...Look, I'm not feeling too great right now, and last time someone told me I was a rape apologist that thread was locked a day later. Let's not go there. Nice try, though.So the threat of gang rape is justified for letting a comedian know he's crossing the line.
"Someone go rape that bitch to shut her up" is threatening. Saying it would be amusing if she got raped is not threatening. It's certainly not funny, but I think it goes a little far to claim that he was trying to incite the crowd to any sort of violence.I don't think it would have gotten to the point where someone in the crowd heard that and grabbed her and held her down, etc, but it's certainly threatening.
no, no it isn't, but I have a sense that neither side is telling the whole truth of what really happened. This reminds me of Mr. Zimmerman in Florida, The argument that keeps coming back is that a fight was started and someone terrible came of it. What I am trying to say is that if you pick a fight with another person, how much right do you have to complain about the repercussions? with Zimmerman, the point I am trying to make is that he allegedly started a course of action that ended with him shooting someone to death. These are two drastically different scenarios both completely unfortunate. There is a defined level of guilt via interaction, neither side made a good choice, and something bad came of it. However, Tosh's threat, I believe, is without teeth. What he said was wrong, and lacking tact. He should have come up with a better response, I am sure he is going to take a lot of heat for this, and in 2 weeks time no one will talk about it, because there will be a new scandal to bitch about.So the threat of gang rape is justified for letting a comedian know he's crossing the line.
Rape is worse than murder by an order of magnitude. The victim of murder does not have to life with the shame of the event for the rest of his life.Obviously people think gang-rape is worse than murder by an order of magnitude.
If that were true then the penalties for rape would be worse than the penalties for murder. Society may say that rape is worse, but it's plainly obvious that it's not, or that society isn't willing to back up its words with actions.Rape is worse than murder by an order of magnitude. The victim of murder does not have to life with the shame of the event for the rest of his life.
Didn't we just have this thread?Rape is worse than murder by an order of magnitude. The victim of murder does not have to life with the shame of the event for the rest of his life.
I don't see anything ballsy about an already established comedian, who has a pretty large fanbase that will support him due to Tosh.0 and previous stand up, telling a heckler they should be raped.The guy was basically saying, "what if the worst thing happened to this douche-bag who's heckling me... like... right now?"
Is it funny? Not really. Was it ballsy? Hells yeah.
In the end... it worked... the bitch shut the fuck up and got the fuck out.
PennIf that were true then the penalties for rape would be worse than the penalties for murder. Society may say that rape is worse, but it's plainly obvious that it's not, or that society isn't willing to back up its words with actions.
The problem is that rape didn't occur, the threat of rape didn't occur. So now we're stuck with trying to argue about whether a comedian was "right" or not to make a "joke" directed at an unruly member of the audience.Can we all just agree that rape is a really bad thing and not have this bizarro fight?
ಠ_ಠ“Wouldn’t it be funny if that Obama got shot by like, 5 guys right now? Like right now? What if a bunch of guys just shot him…”
Let's see if the Secret Service would think this is not a threat.
At the very least it's inciting violence.
Tried to logically reply to this... then IRape is worse than murder by an order of magnitude. The victim of murder does not have to life with the shame of the event for the rest of his life.
Hmm, for me anyway, that's yet another discussion. I think it's perfectly possible and OK to make jokes about the subject of rape; even very shocking/graphic/whatever jokes (though possibly with a bit of warning - though if Tosh is all that well-known his name is warning enough, I guess). But it's not because it's a topic you can joke about and that's a bit edgy, that anything you say about it is always funny or appropriate.The problem is that rape didn't occur, the threat of rape didn't occur. So now we're stuck with trying to argue about whether a comedian was "right" or not to make a "joke" directed at an unruly member of the audience.
Some people here a trying to state that since rape is so bad - which we all agree with - then, taken to the logical extreme, even joking about rape is so bad, and thus under no circumstance should or could a reasonable person think that the comedian was "right".
No one is arguing about the relative badness of rape. But some are trying to use the badness of rape as a lever to say that it can never, ever be invoked in humorous conversation. It should instead be given dignified weight and due reverence.
It would be akin to saying that comedians should never take the name of god in vain, or use that subject matter lightly.
It might be offensive.
So you are either saying that murderers should receive sentences of five years or less, or that rapists should receive life sentences or death penalty?Our society has many failings.
RAPE APOLOGIST!Hmm, for me anyway, that's yet another discussion. I think it's perfectly possible and OK to make jokes about the subject of rape; even very shocking/graphic/whatever jokes (though possibly with a bit of warning - though if Tosh is all that well-known his name is warning enough, I guess). But it's not because it's a topic you can joke about and that's a bit edgy, that anything you say about it is always funny or appropriate.
Making a joke about rape is one thing. Telling someone you hopethey get raped is another.
Q: "What's pink and turns red at the press of a button?"
A: "A baby in a blender"
is a joke.
Q: "I hope your baby gets killed by a mass-murderer in a horrific way, because you deserve it, you bitch"
A: "..."
is not a joke, it's being rude and offensive for the sake of being rude and offensive.
I have the feeling that the youth of today (oh god I'm turning into Dave) is more and more confusing these two. "Being offensive" has become funny in its own right; offending people has bercome the goal. That's not the point of joking about a taboo subject.
I hope you meet BananaHands in a dark alley when you're all alone.RAPE APOLOGIST!
I'm honestly surprised it took three pages to invoke "rape culture"The answer is "rape culture" and patriarchy and male privilege.
I hope he brings fresh banana hands. The black squishy ones are only good for banana bread, and while I love banana bread it's really too time consuming.I hope you meet BananaHands in a dark alley when you're all alone.
then go and have a beer together
Don't threaten meI hope you meet BananaHands in a dark alley when you're all alone.
then go and have a beer together
Hey, you said rape and then didn't say "is the worst thing in the world ever" which is the only thing, legally, you can say after the word rape (which is the worst thing ever in the world). Way to apologize also rape culture which is the worst thing to ever happen ever.RAPE APOLOGIST!
You make a compelling point, but it turns out that to some people that's funny. That is merely another type of humor for them. Off-ending people. They believe its funny to annoy and upset others. To tip and trip them up, make them feel uncomfortable, and cause them to question their assumptions and beliefs.offending people has bercome the goal.
Come on man. Don't be obtuse. You know this is different than saying that on a stage in a position of power with a group of (likely men) laughing along with the "joke".Wouldn't it be funny if like, a plane crashed on you for that like right now? Oh man I'm totally encuraging people to 9-11 you. Im a monster. There is no other explination.
I'm not going to even bother reply with what I was about to say because you nailed it. Nobody in this thread is laughing about rape. Seriously. Words only have as much power to hurt you as you allow them to have.text
You make a compelling point, but it turns out that to some people that's funny. That is merely another type of humor for them. Off-ending people. They believe its funny to annoy and upset others. To tip and trip them up, make them feel uncomfortable, and cause them to question their assumptions and beliefs.
To some degree it's a bit like sarcasm. Some people will never find it funny, and can't possibly understand why others would find it funny.
But the reality is that people view things from fundamentally different perspectives. Something that would offend me might not offend you. If you don't find it offensive, you might find it funny because you know me to some degree, and therefore it becomes an inside joke.
Well known inside jokes that are offensive to some might include racist jokes like certain ethnicities/races preferring fried chicken, or other ethnicities/races being known as penny pinchers.
So then the question is not whether being offensive is the objective and thus the "bad" type of comedy, but whether the intended audience accepts it as a joke at the expense of those that would become offended.
If we got rid of all the jokes in the world which can only occur at the expense of another human, I think we'd eliminate most jokes. It's often when we identify our own foibles and poke fun at them that some humor occurs. I particularly enjoy self deprecating comedians, but that doesn't mean I don't laugh at the jokes at the expense of law enforcement, TSA workers, and programmers.
It's not funny that he suggested rape as the answer to her heckling.
It's funny that with one single sequence of words he was able to completely shut her down and get her to high tail it out of there.
He didn't threaten her. He didn't punch her. He didn't do anything but use his words.
And people laughed not because they were all imagining her getting raped. They laughed because she started a fight and lost so completely that she fled. She didn't flee in fear, she fled due to complete humiliation.
And once she found a safe spot away from him behind the Internet and the specter of rape culture, she renewed her attack and said he was a bad comedian for humiliating her so badly she couldn't keep her resolve and she fled with her tail between her legs.
She's not trying to stop rape culture, she's trying to get back at the guy that humiliated her in front of a few hundred people so badly that they laughed at her on the way out the door.
And so by that logic, anyone can say anything to you they want, and not only can they not be held accountable, but you don't even have the right to have an emotional response?I'm not going to even bother reply with what I was about to say because you nailed it. Nobody in this thread is laughing about rape. Seriously. Words only have as much power to hurt you as you allow them to have.
Really?And so by that logic, anyone can say anything to you they want, and not only can they not be held accountable, but you don't even have the right to have an emotional response?
I'm not trying to attack her, I'm following the thread of her logic to illustrate it's absurdity. Everybody knows I'm perfectly capable of using words to hurt people, I don't have to flex elocutive nuts every single post.Really?
Is this the best you can come up with?
The hell, I'm getting the Gas Light type of content here today.
Booooo
She singled herself out and invited him to hurt her. He had a lot of options and chose one that he felt would hurt her. That was the whole point of him responding to her heckling. "this is my show. I'm in control. I am shutting you down and making sure I stay in control"But you can sometimes know very well which words will hurt another person. Just because you know this logically doesn't mean you wouldn't be hurt if people started calling you ___.
I'm not here to be served sloppy lazy as fuck Gasbandit posts, you should be ashamed of yourself and your third rate ranting today.I'm not trying to attack her, I'm following the thread of her logic to illustrate it's absurdity. Everybody knows I'm perfectly capable of using words to hurt people, I don't have to flex elocutive nuts every single post.
Surely you are not asserting that the ends always justifies the means, regardless of disproportionate response.Does it really matter exactly what hurt he used to reassert his control over the stage?
this is complete bullshitWords only have as much power to hurt you as you allow them to have.
I'm not here to be served sloppy lazy as fuck Gasbandit posts, you should be ashamed of yourself and your third rate ranting today.
No, but I wasn't about to write a treatise on the subject either. Yes, there are shades of gray. Some are saying that this is too dark, and others are saying that it's lighter than it seems.Surely you are not asserting that the ends always justifies the means, regardless of disproportionate response.
I am, obviously.No, but I wasn't about to write a treatise on the subject either. Yes, there are shades of gray. Some are saying that this is too dark, and others are saying that it's lighter than it seems.
Who is right?
Are you using the legal definition of threaten, the dictionary definition of threaten, or your own version of threaten?Then Tosh threatened her.
You've chosen a much better path than I have, that's for sure. I feel like I'm defending an idiot who probably could have handled a bully in his audience better, but can't exactly be faulted for bullying them right back.EDIT: Nope, not getting into this argument.
Do you hold all women to your standard? That they need experience the levels of psychological pain and humiliation that nearly drove you to end your life, and shrug it off because you did? Does your suffering dictate that all must share the experience with grace and serenity?I've had way, way worse things said to me in my life than "Wouldn't it be funny if five guys raped you?" When I was in junior high and the first part of high school, I had literally no friends and was bullied almost to the point where I committed suicide -- and we're talking shit I could have gotten kids arrested for, if I wasn't so afraid of further physical retaliation -- and then I spent five years with a guy who made the list of epithets even longer. I get it. And that's why I can say now -- after overcoming all that shit and building up my self-esteem from zero -- words only have as much power to hurt you as you allow them to have. It's really that easy.
Nope. People can react to things however they damn well choose. That's my entire point -- you have control over your reaction to things, for good or for ill.Do you hold all women to your standard? That they need experience the levels of psychological pain and humiliation that nearly drove you to end your life, and shrug it off because you did? Does your suffering dictate that all must share the experience with grace and serenity?
Please keep your genitalia outside of them though, unless you're posting in the NSFW forum.Please keep your hands, head, arms, and legs inside the threads at all times.
But if you did think of what you could handle afterwards! It'd be like exposing yourself to the worlds diseases so you can strengthen your immune system.But I also don't go out looking for trouble and heckle shock comedians in the middle of their shows.
I'll keep them covered, but they are staying right here with me, you understand?Please keep your genitalia outside of them though, unless you're posting in the NSFW forum.
So if someone were to randomly e-publish your home address, times you've been observed to arrive and depart and when you are most commonly home alone, those are just words, and you wouldn't be emotionally affected at all?Nope. People can react to things however they damn well choose. That's my entire point -- you have control over your reaction to things, for good or for ill.
But I also don't go out looking for trouble and heckle shock comedians in the middle of their shows.
Fine, he made it out that RAPE is A-OK it is funny for 5 men to beat and rape her because she dare put in her input when he asks for it.Are you using the legal definition of threaten, the dictionary definition of threaten, or your own version of threaten?
Did he threaten her or did she perceive a threat in his words, or both according to your chosen definition?
Was there real motive, means and opportunity such that the threat was plausible, possible, likely, or a certainty?
I don't think anyone can argue that the environment - a comedy show - suggested that the stage performance was intended to be anything other than humor, and in fact your assertion that he asked for ideas, and then immediately used that idea suggests, if anything, only points towards this merely being part of his act.
But without video I don't think anyone not present can really make the claim you make, which is that Daniel Tosh threatened this audience member with gang rape.[DOUBLEPOST=1342130606][/DOUBLEPOST]
You've chosen a much better path than I have, that's for sure. I feel like I'm defending an idiot who probably could have handled a bully in his audience better, but can't exactly be faulted for bullying them right back.
I think you have the right idea, my friend.Welp, this thread is going nowhere fast now.
Abandoning thread.
I'm not the one who asserted words only affect you if you let them. When you make an absolute assertion, as Droll has, you have to be prepared for that assertion to be put to the test. If it fails then it is unsound.What is your deal with taking a situation, reducing it to some fundamental concept, and then blowing it out to the most extreme situation you could?
Would you be happy about it if Han Solo and Chewie came to your door and told you that they hated you? They are just words.
No offense, Steinman, but this sounds monumentally stupid.If that were true then the penalties for rape would be worse than the penalties for murder. Society may say that rape is worse, but it's plainly obvious that it's not, or that society isn't willing to back up its words with actions.
That never made any sense to me, because sticks and stones do a lifetime of harm too!Sticks and stones my hurt my bones, but words.... well... they can do a lifetime of harm.
Indeed.I knew that when I wrote it, but it irks me whenever people say that words cannot hurt them.. Because well.. They are being untrue.
It is nice to know that he would have a level head about the altercation.Dane Cook said:"If you journey through this life easily offended by other people's words I think it's best for everyone if you just kill yourself,"
An easier, and less sexist (men don't understand rape) and/or anti-politics (you have to be a heartless asshole to go into politics) way to respond might've been "morals and laws don't always match up; legality and morality are separated and it's foolish to view local and man-made laws as a basis for a universal moral system". I have to say, I raised my eyebrows over that phrase of Stien's, too.No offense, Steinman, but this sounds monumentally stupid.
Ploicy and laws are put into pace by men. Most men have trouble comprehending what rape does to a person.
Society says it's worst...but the men in charge can't grasp that because, I believe, it takes a decent amount of cold heartedness to go into politics of any kind.
I may be of base..but this comment just rubs me the wrong way.
If I can be a little insensitive, words only hurt you if you let them. However, not everyone has the wherewithal to withstand that brutality. It takes a very ...strange... kind of personality to be able to stand tall under a barrage of that nature and I have the utmost respect for those that even try.I knew that when I wrote it, but it irks me whenever people say that words cannot hurt them.. Because well.. They are being untrue.
Perhaps. I wasn't trying to be PC in my statement...though if I had to change one thing it would be implying that only men have a hand in law and policy. There are just as man socially distant women out there that just can't grasp certain things.An easier, and less sexist (men don't understand rape) and/or anti-politics (you have to be a heartless asshole to go into politics) way to respond might've been "morals and laws don't always match up; legality and morality are separated and it's foolish to view local and man-made laws as a basis for a universal moral system". I have to say, I raised my eyebrows over that phrase of Stien's, too.
If I can be a little insensitive, words only hurt you if you let them. However, not everyone has the wherewithal to withstand that brutality. It takes a very ...strange... kind of personality to be able to stand tall under a barrage of that nature and I have the utmost respect for those that even try.
I know. I was pretty sure you didn't mean it as either sexist or anti-political, judging from previous posts.Perhaps. I wasn't trying to be PC in my statement...though if I had to change one thing it would be implying that only men have a hand in law and policy. There are just as man socially distant women out there that just can't grasp certain things.
I'm not anti-politics either. I actually endorse a little bit od coldnes in my politicians. I don't want a guy to party with if we met up..I want a guy that looks at all facts and helps guide the body he's helping rule over in the direction that'll benefit most people. This ,however, does mean that such a candidate would be a little more tense when it comes to something so...personal.
It's not the words that are hurting you, it's the ignorance and stupidity. If I called you a lazy American, you'd laugh and point out that you're 1) not American and 2) not lazy. If some random stranger came up to you and called you a lazy American, your response would be different.Deja vu.
Simply being in the LGBT spectrum makes you an instant target for a lot of hate. Not even having done anything that would justify such actions and vitriol. People will go from liking you to hating you once they find out you are gay or whatever. Often it's also met with more than words (which further exemplifies how much is still wrong in these oh so 'tolerant' countries), but (to get back on track) even just the words can do serious damage and eventually lead to suicide (as illustrated by our very own HowDroll). This happens daily. It happens for countless people and it may happen to your children. I would not teach my kids "words don't hurt (with an implied: so stop crying about it)" because I would be lying. They can, do, and will hurt millions of people of every color, faith and gender every single day.
Ok, I'm going to draw from a strange playbook here. Word's don't hurt, not if you have a strong ego. If someone can say something and make you question your own value then you have a weak ego. They did not hurt you, you were already flawed. If someone told me "You're a rapist" it wouldn't hurt because I KNOW I'm not a rapist. If someone said "You're lazy and a fraud" then it would hurt, because my ego is weak on those things. But the words don't create reality, they only put light on reality.I'm not the one who asserted words only affect you if you let them. When you make an absolute assertion, as Droll has, you have to be prepared for that assertion to be put to the test. If it fails then it is unsound.
Also the Han and Chewie comparison makes no sense.
I honestly can't tell whether this post is meant as trolling or serious. If serious, you really need to re-evaluate your views. Words don't change reality, but they change perception of reality. Both yours, and that of other people. People telling you you are worthless will make you feel worthless. This will give you a worse self-image, leading to being "weaker", to being more concerned about yourself, etc etc. People telling others you are worthless will make those others look at you in a lesser light, make a worse assessment of you, and so on. People telling you that you are [insert typical insecurity here], when you're already insecure on this topic, will further increase your sensitivity to this issue, thus causing (possibly over-)reactions.But the words don't create reality, they only put light on reality.
Many monuments could be built to my stupidity, but no one ever bothers to actually build one. I remain an unrecognized genius of stupidity.No offense, Steinman, but this sounds monumentally stupid.
Stienman, I understand what you're trying to say, but it's my sincere advice that you stop talking and leave this thread before you lose the respect of every forum member involved in this argument.Many monuments could be built to my stupidity, but no one ever bothers to actually build one. I remain an unrecognized genius of stupidity.
I suspect the reason why this statement rubs people the wrong way is that both are horrifyingly terrible things, and the reality is that we're really comparing things so far at the other end of the spectrum from happy happy joy joy that they might as well be the same and being that close at the end it's disingenuous to compare them, especially since there are examples of rapes that are clearly worse than some murders, and examples of murders that are clearly worse than some rapes.
You can't generalize, as I did, that "murder is worse than rape" because that's not going to be true for every instance of murder and rape.
However, the law does take into account, to some degree, the severity of the act in either case and thus there are some rapists that get worse punishment than some murderers.
But strictly speaking, comparing one count of rape against one count of murder with no extenuating factors, no pre-meditiation in either case, etc, the punishment for murder is generally more severe, and I don't think it's because lawmakers can't know, or don't know, or haven't taken into account the trauma that rape can inflict.
So, very generally speaking, I don't think our society holds rape to quite the severity as murder. I don't think the law is far from what the majority actually believe the punishment should be. I think that if people want to punish rapists more harshly than murders, generally, then society will have to change to believe that rape is a worse crime than murder. I don't think it's the other way around.
Yeah, it's coming across as "the law is correct because it's the law".Stienman, I understand what you're trying to say, but it's my sincere advice that you stop talking and leave this thread before you lose the respect of every forum member involved in this argument.
I'm pretty sure most people would like both to be sentenced quite a lot more harshly than they are at the moment. Heck, both rape and murder will usualyl get you less than 10 years in prison in Belgium - not because "we, the people" choose it to be so, but because practically anything will be "downgraded" from requiring a jury to being judged only by a judge. However, judges can give a maximum of 5 years in prison, not counting pre-arrest and such - giving you a max of around 10 years. Saves money on juries and on prisons, you know.I don't think the law is far from what the majority actually believe the punishment should be.
Maybe she was in the theater....Yeah, it's coming across as "the law is correct because it's the law".
And I'm wishing Shego was here, so bad.
True - and I'll add that the more violent varieties tend to still get tried before a jury and get higher sentences. Still, even a fairly non-violent rape deserves more than 5 or 6 years, to me.And Bubble your nation's culture is nowhere near as violent as ours.
Wouldn't it be funny if when Tosh left, Shego came up behind him with a giant dildo and...Maybe she was in the theater....
https://www.halforums.com/threads/daniel-tosh-is-an-ass.27978/#post-966635
He posted about 10 videos in total to make his point, while missing the point.
That was awesome.[DOUBLEPOST=1342140830][/DOUBLEPOST]You make a compelling point, but it turns out that to some people that's funny. That is merely another type of humor for them. Off-ending people. They believe its funny to annoy and upset others. To tip and trip them up, make them feel uncomfortable, and cause them to question their assumptions and beliefs.
To some degree it's a bit like sarcasm. Some people will never find it funny, and can't possibly understand why others would find it funny.
But the reality is that people view things from fundamentally different perspectives. Something that would offend me might not offend you. If you don't find it offensive, you might find it funny because you know me to some degree, and therefore it becomes an inside joke.
Well known inside jokes that are offensive to some might include racist jokes like certain ethnicities/races preferring fried chicken, or other ethnicities/races being known as penny pinchers.
So then the question is not whether being offensive is the objective and thus the "bad" type of comedy, but whether the intended audience accepts it as a joke at the expense of those that would become offended.
If we got rid of all the jokes in the world which can only occur at the expense of another human, I think we'd eliminate most jokes. It's often when we identify our own foibles and poke fun at them that some humor occurs. I particularly enjoy self deprecating comedians, but that doesn't mean I don't laugh at the jokes at the expense of law enforcement, TSA workers, and programmers.
It's not funny that he suggested rape as the answer to her heckling.
It's funny that with one single sequence of words he was able to completely shut her down and get her to high tail it out of there.
He didn't threaten her. He didn't punch her. He didn't do anything but use his words.
And people laughed not because they were all imagining her getting raped. They laughed because she started a fight and lost so completely that she fled. She didn't flee in fear, she fled due to complete humiliation.
And once she found a safe spot away from him behind the Internet and the specter of rape culture, she renewed her attack and said he was a bad comedian for humiliating her so badly she couldn't keep her resolve and she fled with her tail between her legs.
She's not trying to stop rape culture, she's trying to get back at the guy that humiliated her in front of a few hundred people so badly that they laughed at her on the way out the door.
Yeah, but the lady essentially was dangling her lunch money in front of the bully and then got crazy surprised that he took it and shoved her in the mud in the process.See, the humour here is a bit what you said yourself: this is funny because she's humiliated. That's humour at the level of bullying and thinking it's funny to hang the nerd up the flagpole by his underwear. That's not humour, that's humiliating/degrading someone. A comedian whose schtick it is to bully and humiliate people isn't a very good comedian. He's an ass, and a bully.
The moral of the story is there is nothing fun about rape, unless you are the rapist.
That's what rapists tend to say about rape victims.Yeah, but the lady essentially was dangling her lunch money in front of the bully and then got crazy surprised that he took it and shoved her in the mud in the process.
That's what rapists tend to say about rape victims.
That is exactly the same as someone forcing his dick into you.Yeah, ok, do me a favor. Go to Time Square and wave 100 bucks around. Post me a picture of your surprised face when someone snatches it from you.
He wasn't talking about rape; he was talking about giving a woman a harsh comeback. You are deliberately twisting his argument to suggest he's a rape apologist. His analogy of waving a bill in front of someone and getting it stolen, is much closer to heckling a comedian and getting chewed out, than your comparison to rape. Reread this thread; either you're misinterpreting and are, for some reason, suddenly thinking he's defending some sort of rape, or you're strawmanning out of your ass and trying to make him look guilty by association, both of which are crappy argumentational tools for when you know you're losing the debate.That is exactly the same as someone forcing his dick into you.
I'm not gonna get into this with you since rape = bad is some kind of gray area on your end.He wasn't talking about rape; he was talking about giving a woman a harsh comeback. You are deliberately twisting his argument to suggest he's a rape apologist. His analogy of waving a bill in front of someone and getting it stolen, is much closer to heckling a comedian and getting chewed out, than your comparison to rape. Reread this thread; either you're misinterpreting and are, for some reason, suddenly thinking he's defending some sort of rape, or you're strawmanning out of your ass and trying to make him look guilty by association, both of which are crappy argumentational tools for when you know you're losing the debate.
Then don't change the scenario from opposing force (heckler vs guy on stage) to victim scenario (person with money vs thief) which considering the subject at hand and what checkeredhat pointed out, is the same kind of metaphor made by rapists of women who are "asking for it".What? Are you high? I'm not saying it's right. I'm saying that's what's going to happen.
I'm not gonna get into this with you since rape = bad is some kind of gray area on your end.
Then don't change the scenario from opposing force (heckler vs guy on stage) to victim scenario (person with money vs thief) which considering the subject at hand and what checkeredhat pointed out, is the same kind of metaphor made by rapists of women who are "asking for it".
If that's not what you meant, you need a different analogy.
Well, he can't see me anymore, but I'll clarify that "rape is a gray area" and "sometimes women are asking for it"... yeah, that sounds like someone with a real understanding of what he said wrong.[DOUBLEPOST=1342144301][/DOUBLEPOST]Fuck off. I've said 10.000 times I. DO. NOT. THINK. ANY. RAPE. IS. OK.
I'm done talking to you. You don't listen, you get an idea in your head and stick with it. Go reread that thread adn get it through your head I wasn't talking about rape, I was talking about several of the grey areas that do exist surrounding rape.
Trolling and getting a rise out of people may be fun to you, but it's a bloody nuisance to me. Congrats on being the very first person, ever, on my ignore list.
I don't agree, but I see where we're differing. You're saying because she made mention of the joke type being not funny, she invited him to try doing exactly that (which he failed completely and utterly). I was looking at it as she made a verbal prod, and he came back with a verbal overkill. So more like poking the bear and getting a swat than offering it to swat you.The scenario I described with the money is EXACTLY what went down with the heckler. EXACTLY! She waved a steak in front of a bear and then "oh shit faced" when it swatted a paw at her face. In no way am I saying something along the lines of "she deserved it because she wore a red dress".
Well, he can't see me anymore, but I'll clarify that "rape is a gray area" and "sometimes women are asking for it"... yeah, that sounds like someone with a real understanding of what he said wrong.[DOUBLEPOST=1342144301][/DOUBLEPOST]
I don't agree, but I see where we're differing. You're saying because she made mention of the joke type being not funny, she invited him to try doing exactly that (which he failed completely and utterly). I was looking at it as she made a verbal prod, and he came back with a verbal overkill. So more like poking the bear and getting a swat than offering it to swat you.
I'm a little puzzled by the disagrees I got about freedom of speech. I kind of wish people had explained that one rather than just disagree and move on.Not the disagree.
NOT THE DISAGREE!
Eh, I can't make fun of it anymore now that I've used it.
All right, let's lay down my point of view in a nice and simple list.If you seriously can't grasp how fucked it was that she interrupted him the first place, then I think we're done discussing this.
Look, I took you right back off my ignore list because I didn't want to be a baby and whatever, but this? For the last time, GO READ WHAT I WROTE. Others even explained it better than I could. I was talking about instances where, for example, a girl was OK with it but changed her mind afterwards. I was talking about the fin line (and fuck off, it IS) between a girl who's had a bit to drink and has slightly lowered inhibitions, doing things she otherwise wouldn't dare, and a girl that has had too much to drink and does thinks she otherwise wouldn't want to. For all I care, there are some other grey areas you can include as well. An 18 year old with a 55 year old is legal and all you want, but is fucking creepy and wrong. A 19 year old and a 17 year old are illegal in many states/countries, while it can be a perfectly healthy relationship (I'm not talking Icarus-age-differences here, mind). I'm not saying, nor have I ever said, rape is a moral grey area. I have said, and will continue to say, that there are a lot of grey areas surrounding rape and similar issues.All right, let's lay down my point of view in a nice and simple list.
- Tosh is no comedian.
- She shouldn't have heckled and was an ass for doing so. < -- I want people to remember this one as I get into the rest of it.
- If he was going to make a joke, he should have made one. There's a difference between making a rape joke and acting like rape itself is a joke. He did the latter, because all he did was bring up rape and say "wouldn't it be funny?" I understand some people lack talent and it's hard for him to create a witty comeback on the fly. He should've had something prepped, ignored her, or told her to get the hell out if she didn't like the show. He had alternatives, choices, but because he's a douchebag, he said what he said. It wasn't a situation of equal wrongs; one did wrong, he could've handled it in other ways. He didn't.
- Whether she genuinely felt threatened or she came home and launched an assault from the safety of the internet, he still shouldn't have said what he said. If the answer to his question is "no" then he shouldn't said it. She may be full of shit about how she felt. I don't know; I'm not in her head. He still shouldn't have said it.
- The answer is "no".
- Rape is bad. Clean cut, no gray areas as Bubble believes, it is bad, end of story.
In what world do you live in where those things are a major problem?Either get it through your head that that is not what I said or say; get off your fucking high white horse to observe the actual world, and not the ideal one where no girl has ever claimed rape where none happened, where no girl ever drank her own problems away and got into bed with someone afterwards who she'd not consider in plain daylight
It's actually pretty disgusting to twist someones argument into something along the lines that they're ok with rape. Any idiot can understand that pretty much everyone universally agrees that rape is bad with no grey areas. That doesn't mean that jokes about it don't have grey areas. I'm 100% certain that no where Bubble was defending rapists or the act itself. Any moron can see that, unless you're simply trolling to get a rise out of either of us.
We already had a lovely thread discussing this. I don't care if it's a small/minute problem. According to the official figures (and I'm absolutely in agreeance that rape is a hugely underreported crime and the actual numbers are much higher, unfortunately), the rape rate in the US is about 30 per 100.000 people. That is "rare"" and whatever as well. It's still a big issue. If even 1 in a thousand of those rapes is a case where it isn't cut-and-dried, where perhaps it wasn't actually rape but she's now claiming it is for some other reasons (to avoid divorce, say), or whatever, that's still 90 people A YEAR, in the US alone, who're being falsely accused of rape, or being threatened with the accusation of rape, or whatever.In what world do you live in where those things are a major problem?
Yeah dude you are so brave for sticking up for the men by doubting rape victims. And yes, the things you call grey areas are still rape.We already had a lovely thread discussing this. I don't care if it's a small/minute problem. According to the official figures (and I'm absolutely in agreeance that rape is a hugely underreported crime and the actual numbers are much higher, unfortunately), the rape rate in the US is about 30 per 100.000 people. That is "rare"" and whatever as well. It's still a big issue. If even 1 in a thousand of those rapes is a case where it isn't cut-and-dried, where perhaps it wasn't actually rape but she's now claiming it is for some other reasons (to avoid divorce, say), or whatever, that's still 90 people A YEAR, in the US alone, who're being falsely accused of rape, or being threatened with the accusation of rape, or whatever.
You think those 90 lives aren't worth saving, or these cases aren't worth the consideration, and you're just as bad as the people who claim rape isn't a huge issue and only affects a minute minority and it isn't worth all those tax dollars.
Rape, murder, child abuse, hate crimes, they're all issues that only affect a small minority. They're still worth investigating and checking and spending whole huge wads of money on. I never claimed false rape accusations, or questionable rape cases, or whatever, are a huge factor or incredibly important. But I still stand by my point. Even if it only happens one time throughout all of history, that one person's life being ruined is still a major thing.
You understand, but you disagree with it, and believe that others will either misundstand or disagree too, and thereby I might lose their respect?Stienman, I understand what you're trying to say, but it's my sincere advice that you stop talking and leave this thread before you lose the respect of every forum member involved in this argument.
I did. I reported this thread for getting out of hand way back when I posted the inn before the loch.Bubble....dude...breathe a little.
This is obviously a hot button for you. You need to step back, like, three posts ago.
Uh, he actually makes a really good point and one I happen to agree with.Yeah dude you are so brave for sticking up for the men by doubting rape victims. And yes, the things you call grey areas are still rape.
Sorry, I forgot our justice system was based on "innocent until proven guilty, unless about rape, because the mere accusation is definite proof and you should be instantly shot the moment someone suggests you might have looked at a drunk girl the wrong way".Yeah dude you are so brave for sticking up for the men by doubting rape victims. And yes, the things you call grey areas are still rape.
But if it wasn't me pouring those drinks down her throat, it's not rape.
Right. It just would have been you choosing to have sex with someone who couldn't properly consent.But if it wasn't me pouring those drinks down her throat, it's not rape.