Yeah, but a fine on the wealthy is one they can easily pay, whereas the poor are left to have to send their children into further wars.My wife's take on hearing about this: "Well, that's a novel way to go after the wealthy."
--Patrick
I like it from a perspective of "this will make war way more unpopular among the masses."
But I don't want to die.The first debate is about to start. Remember: take a drink when Warren says she has a plan for that. One drink when you don't remember who this person is. Finish your drink when they ignore the question to slam dunk on Trump.
I'm planning on watching it tomorrow but I really like where this candidate is going.Moderator: how would you deal with Mitch McConnell?
Candidate: okay, so here's the thing about guns....
Spoiler: it's like 3 of them in a rowI'm planning on watching it tomorrow but I really like where this candidate is going.
It might go something like this:I wonder how many of the other group will show us their Spanish skills.
FTFYModerator : Congressman Delaney, we will get to you
Ron Howard: they would not
I don't know about damage. It's more "You had your time, please stop trying to direct and let those in a better position take charge and fix what you already know is broken."Dear Bernie and Joe, It's not ageism. It's not discrimination. It's your generation has done enough damage, so get the fuck out of the way.
White guy boomers? I'll stick with damage. It's time to shove them off the stage if they won't go quietly.I don't know about damage. It's more "You had your time, please stop trying to direct and let those in a better position take charge and fix what you already know is broken."
What? I didn't say any of that? I didn't even say who I'm pulling for?White guy boomers? I'll stick with damage. It's time to shove them off the stage if they won't go quietly.
You were questioning my use of the term damage, yes? So I clarified.What? I didn't say any of that? I didn't even say who I'm pulling for?