Then if their ain't a Mark Hamil cameo- I GON' CUT SOMEBODY! Or just not see it, whatevs.The new trilogy is live action.
ummmmmmmmmmmmmmDisney has been very good with getting quality directors for their Marvel films;
Yeah, I agree. Shane Black is an untested director, but everyone else has been good.ummmmmmmmmmmmmm
I'm afraid with Disney at the helm, they may just tell the EU to go fuck itself.So - I haven't really had time yet to pore over the release.
1) I'm assuming he will maintain some control over re-releasing the property - i.e. no Star Wars: the Original Cut on Blu-ray.
2) For the 7-9 trilogy, have they discussed whether the plan is to write original material? Or could they possibly just adapt the already fan-accepted Zahn trilogy?
He's trolling again (aka the Avengers thread)Yeah, I agree. Shane Black is an untested director, but everyone else has been good.
1. Originals are encumbered by Fox distribution deal. Not sure on details but Disney seems less concerned with them then going forward.So - I haven't really had time yet to pore over the release.
1) I'm assuming he will maintain some control over re-releasing the property - i.e. no Star Wars: the Original Cut on Blu-ray.
2) For the 7-9 trilogy, have they discussed whether the plan is to write original material? Or could they possibly just adapt the already fan-accepted Zahn trilogy?
It's because you purposely post anti-popularI don't get why I'm trolling when I'm just the only person without my mouth firmly entrenched around Joss Whedon's cock
Favreau wasn't great, Brannaugh was a hilarious mismatch, my misgivings about Avengers are well-documented, and I don't have anything strong to say about the others.
Shane Black owns though, that's why I'm cautiously optimistic for IM3
No, you're trolling because that's all you ever do. People would take your opinions seriously if they weren't all presented as if you were a spastic gibbon.I don't get why I'm trolling when I'm just the only person without my mouth firmly entrenched around Joss Whedon's cock
Favreau wasn't great, Brannaugh was a hilarious mismatch, my misgivings about Avengers are well-documented, and I don't have anything strong to say about the others.
Shane Black owns though, that's why I'm cautiously optimistic for IM3
I'm not being ironic, I fucking love Taylor Swift's music
I'm hoping this won't happen, but I'm guessing it will.I'm afraid with Disney at the helm, they may just tell the EU to go fuck itself.
Starring Mickey Mouse!So it's far more likely that they will write their own sequels.
I don't think they'll toss it out entirely, that seems like too much of "**** you!" to fans they'll want to keep.The Clone Wars show has enough retcons and changes in it without rendering the EU pointless to show you can do it, and like CynicismKills said, Disney has played nice with other properties they've bought. If they could actually bring back the old cast, I'd think they'd be more likely to do their own thing. But I have a hard time seeing that happening.Instead, I'm guessing Disney will toss the EU out the window and just do whatever they want.
Well, I'll admit I'm skeptical. The EU is filled to the brim with tiny details, to the point where EU canon even contradicts itself at times. This means any new movies with a setting anywhere close to where the EU takes place will end up contradicting something. Then they'll either have to go through all the retcon contortions, or just go "screw it, the EU is wrong and our version of events is right."I don't think they'll toss it out entirely, that seems like too much of "**** you!" to fans they'll want to keep.The Clone Wars show has enough retcons and changes in it without rendering the EU pointless to show you can do it, and like CynicismKills said, Disney has played nice with other properties they've bought. If they could actually bring back the old cast, I'd think they'd be more likely to do their own thing. But I have a hard time seeing that happening.
Yeah, getting the guy that does huge, sweeping Shakespearean epics to do a movie about mythical Norse gods is clearly mismatched. *eye roll*Brannaugh was a hilarious mismatch
It's not that hard to handle. The prequels screwed with a lot of stuff too, but the EU worked around them, and both exist side by side. It's not like Star Wars continuity was perfectly balanced before now. The person currently with overriding authority has shown a marked disregard with existing material he didn't create (and in some case, even the material he did create). There can be gaps and retcons that get filled in/corrected by some writer later or that fans will look the other way on/come up with theories that make them work. But throwing out the EU? That's another thing entirely, and I have a hard time believing that's a road they want to go down.Well, I'll admit I'm skeptical. The EU is filled to the brim with tiny details, to the point where EU canon even contradicts itself at times. This means any new movies with a setting anywhere close to where the EU takes place will end up contradicting something. Then they'll either have to go through all the retcon contortions, or just go "screw it, the EU is wrong and our version of events is right."
Oh-wee-yey! (oh-wee-yay!)
Well...I don't get why I'm trolling...
there it is.when I'm just the only person without my mouth firmly entrenched around Joss Whedon's cock
I'm hoping that if Disney sees enough money in it we might see a release of the restored/unmodified original trilogy. I'm not holding my breath but the chances of it are better than they were yesterday.1) I'm assuming he will maintain some control over re-releasing the property - i.e. no Star Wars: the Original Cut on Blu-ray.