GasBandit
Staff member
Also it turns out that his wife made that shirt for him.The first thing I noticed about all these ESA guys is they all seem to have huge sleeve tattoos.
Also it turns out that his wife made that shirt for him.The first thing I noticed about all these ESA guys is they all seem to have huge sleeve tattoos.
Patriarchy!Also it turns out that his wife made that shirt for him.
It's the new reality of the 2014 internet. No one is allowed to do ANYTHING without ridiculeA man should be free to wear what he wants without ridicule.
I'm fairly certain that's not usually acceptable, but nice try.I mean women can wear clothes to work that shows off most of their boobs why can't I wear pants that shows off most of my balls?
AND SO SHOULD WOMEN yet look at all the slut-shaming backlash at Kim Kardashian and the suggestion that rape victims' clothing factors into their consent in the matterA man should be free to wear what he wants without ridicule.
I'm fairly certain you're fooling yourself. Cleavage at work is pretty darn common, and miles more acceptable than any testicular exposure whatsoever.I'm fairly certain that's not usually acceptable, but nice try.
It's only acceptable to the extent objectification of women is acceptable. If men were objectified to the same degree as women, there would be special cock sleeves in every pair of pants that showed women just how big every guy's dick was. And most shirts would expose a man's shoulder line and/or collarbone area as well. Not even to mention how tight the pants would fit around a guy's butt.I'm fairly certain you're fooling yourself. Cleavage at work is pretty darn common, and miles more acceptable than any testicular exposure whatsoever.
Am I the only one who doesn't work at Hooters?I'm fairly certain you're fooling yourself. Cleavage at work is pretty darn common, and miles more acceptable than any testicular exposure whatsoever.
My old job, the only person that dressed above a PG rating was one of the partners, but she uh, kind of owned the place so.Am I the only one who doesn't work at Hooters?
So... explain to me how the owner of a business is "objectified" by dressing how she wants because she can get away with it because she's the boss. As I understand it, objectification denotes a loss of power, a loss of personhood. This seems to be an expression of power and control.My old job, the only person that dressed above a PG rating was one of the partners, but she uh, kind of owned the place so.
I think it's two different conversations. I was just talking about my experience in an office there to BowieLee, not the objectification part toward you.So... explain to me how the owner of a business is "objectified" by dressing how she wants because she can get away with it because she's the boss. As I understand it, objectification denotes a loss of power, a loss of personhood. This seems to be an expression of power and control.
You mad bro?AND SO SHOULD WOMEN yet look at all the slut-shaming backlash at Kim Kardashian and the suggestion that rape victims' clothing factors into their consent in the matter
yeahYou mad bro?
I bought a cherry pie at the grocery store, so I felt comfortable posting that without just being a pie poser.Now I'm just mad that there's no pie.
I'm gonna go ahead and make an educated guess that that shirt is marketed to gay men, not women.Turns out there's a hunky dudes version of the shirt, too. Equality, huzzah!
I hate to say this, but do they kinda look like Edward and Jacob,or is that just my phone? Also, going to agree with Bowielee on the target audience.The guy with no vest looks creepily young. Like, I don't feel right looking at that picture.
So what would a gaudy hawaiian shirt that appeals to women feature on it?I'm gonna go ahead and make an educated guess that that shirt is marketed to gay men, not women.
For starters, not a gaudy Hawaiian shirt.So what would a gaudy hawaiian shirt that appeals to women feature on it?