We, as a society, happily go to movie after movie and watch a small, rag-tag bunch of misfits team up to defeat a larger, more organized/regimented army of foes (foes who all look identical, btw), and we enthusiastically cheer those misfits on as they learn to work out their differences and combine their strengths until they finally emerge victorious, but then we all leave the theater and complain about immigrants and "replacement" and how DEI is ruining society and I just don't understand why I'm one of the few people who can see the disparity.
--Patrick
I assure you, you're not alone.
This is partially culturally determined, though. America, mostly, but all of the West, focuses more on this sort of "ragtag band" and "strength through diversity" thoughts. America specifically has a very strong tendency to cheer on the rebels against power and strong individuals. Asian media tends to lean more heavily on other aspects. Individualism vs collectivism, etc. Heroes become heroes to protect their family/village/community, not because they're rebelling against an overreaching evil. The Power Rangers are one each black/white/Asian/boy/girl/jock/nerd/whatever, their original counterparts aren't.
Anyway - America was founded on a rebellion against a tyrannical empire. A lot of American like to consider themselves Rugged Individualists. Government communication and propaganda, nation-building around a communal "us", etc, have cemented that kind of thinking.
France, or Belgium, or China, or whatever, all have different histories which get reflected in their cultural sensitivities and accents. Hungary being the remains of an empire that was dissolved after WWI and with nation-building based on being the last bastion protecting the Catholic West against the Turkish/Muslim/Orthodox/etc invaders from the East is a clear example of this as well. Belgium was pretty much founded as a compromise between England, France and the Netherlands after a sort-of revolution by liberals, Catholics, French-speakers, Flemish, the Church, nobility and small bourgeoisie together who all had their own interests and their own identities - which is why the Belgian "national identity" doesn't get much further than "we're definitely
not Dutch or French, and we're good at compromise and negotiating and trying to resolve crises by talking and more talking and then talking some more until everybody is so tired they accept a weak consensus".
Obviously we've been heavily influenced by American media (Hollywood in particular), but even so, in traditional Belgian stories you're more likely to be supposed to be rooting for the guy resolving things peacefully, while in American stories there's often the message that they're weak and ineffective and you have to stand up for yourself.
And all of this is obviously oversimplifying and in no way meant as America-bashing, quite the contrary.