Fair point. Timely reminder that uncharged conduct (criminal acts for which prosecutors did not secure conviction at trial) can also be used in sentencing in U.S. federal courts, which (to me) also feels grossly unjust.
It's rather tyrannical, too. The sort of precedent where a judge could lock up political dissidents for life on a minor charge just by falsely charging them with something heinous that gets dismissed dhring trial.Fair point. Timely reminder that uncharged conduct (criminal acts for which prosecutors did not secure conviction at trial) can also be used in sentencing in U.S. federal courts, which (to me) also feels grossly unjust.
It's more like you can charge the person with the one crime you know you can get a conviction on, then bring up all the uncharged/acquitted related (however tenuously) conduct at sentencing to get them effectively convicted for it on a much lower burden of proof. I'd recommend reading the introduction (5 half-pages) of what I linked, it gives a decently brief overview.It's rather tyrannical, too. The sort of precedent where a judge could lock up political dissidents for life on a minor charge just by falsely charging them with something heinous that gets dismissed dhring trial.
Pauly broke his arrest cherry, but he ain't snitched... he's practically a made man now.
That's essentially what I meant. I just didn't spend much time wording it to be accurate.It's more like you can charge the person with the one crime you know you can get a conviction on, then bring up all the uncharged/acquitted related (however tenuously) conduct at sentencing to get them effectively convicted for it on a much lower burden of proof. I'd recommend reading the introduction (5 half-pages) of what I linked, it gives a decently brief overview.
Today I'll play the part of Racism Watch Dog.
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
Wait, is this the same illegal alien who was a trusted employee at the GOP candidate's family farm?
Today I'll play the part of Racism Watch Dog.
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
Man, if only they hadn't let him in the country, he could have just murdered a Mexican girl...
Today I'll play the part of Racism Watch Dog.
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
I take it Trudeau was sick today?Today I'll play the part of Racism Watch Dog.
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
They'd have polled the jury and the judge would have given a directed verdict. While the process of jury nullification is a thing in our legal system, so are directed verdicts: basically the judge telling the jury to fuck off if there is no reasonable way they could have come to any other decision.Given that, I'm amazed he was convicted of anything.
Translation, "I'm losing face because of all this, so I have to make a public statement in an attempt to appear powerful, but don't expect me to actually do anything."
I've said it before, too stupid to live.How can anyone listen to such ravings and conclude that they're listening to an honest and morally upstanding person?
THE HIGHEST OF STANDARDS...in white supremacy.
I really don’t believe they do. I believe the reason people are dragging their feet is because he is so easily influenced/baited and so they are going to put it off as long as possible until they don’t think they can take advantage of him any more.How can anyone listen to such ravings and conclude that they're listening to an honest and morally upstanding person?
In his direct environment, sure. I don't doubt that many a Republican senator and party leadership type thinks Trump is nuts. I think @figmentPez is referring to the people who voted for him and continue to support him, though.I really don’t believe they do. I believe the reason people are dragging their feet is because he is so easily influenced/baited and so they are going to put it off as long as possible until they don’t think they can take advantage of him any more.
—Patrick
I have relatives who are trump supporters. Near as I can figure, it's because they think he'll take the country back from the blacks, browns, and yellows.In his direct environment, sure. I don't doubt that many a Republican senator and party leadership type thinks Trump is nuts. I think @figmentPez is referring to the people who voted for him and continue to support him, though.
Insofar as they even have it, he'll try - and give it to the rich, white and male. People like us who are two-for-three will still lose, thoughI have relatives who are trump supporters. Near as I can figure, it's because they think he'll take the country back from the blacks, browns, and yellows.
Of course, in this case, I'd say he should go try baby doomies, that'll lead to firework.
Actually that really only works in the favor of the defendant. In the American justice system there is no higher authority than a not guilty verdict by a jury. It can't be appealed and it can't be overruled.They'd have polled the jury and the judge would have given a directed verdict. While the process of jury nullification is a thing in our legal system, so are directed verdicts: basically the judge telling the jury to fuck off if there is no reasonable way they could have come to any other decision.
Note that this is only true for criminal law. In civil law, a judge can override a jury in either direction if warranted (google "JNOV" for more information).Actually that really only works in the favor of the defendant. In the American justice system there is no higher authority than a not guilty verdict by a jury. It can't be appealed and it can't be overruled.
I have an aunt (by marriage) who lives in the FL panhandle and thankfully I only have to see once a year for a couple of days, that thinks exactly this, if you add non-Christians to that list as her reason for her diehard Trumpism.I have relatives who are trump supporters. Near as I can figure, it's because they think he'll take the country back from the blacks, browns, and yellows.
I always have the strong urge to troll my racist relatives by shouting "the man is orange! He's not going to give the country back to *white* people!"I have an aunt (by marriage) who lives in the FL panhandle and thankfully I only have to see once a year for a couple of days, that thinks exactly this, if you add non-Christians to that list as her reason for her diehard Trumpism.
Would be really nice if she had the sense not to say it in front of my husband and child.
I have relatives who are trump supporters. Near as I can figure, it's because they think he'll take the country back from the blacks, browns, and yellows.
My dad is a Trump supporter, but he's not racist. Well, he is, in that he supports policies that are racist, but it's not because he thinks any less of other races, he just genuinely thinks the policies he supports are the best for everyone, and doesn't really acknowledge that institutionalized racism exists.I have an aunt (by marriage) who lives in the FL panhandle and thankfully I only have to see once a year for a couple of days, that thinks exactly this, if you add non-Christians to that list as her reason for her diehard Trumpism.
Would be really nice if she had the sense not to say it in front of my husband and child.