They don't give them out posthumously.The only way he’s getting nominated for a Nobel is posthumously, and then only if there is verifiable proof that he was the one responsible.
—Patrick
They don't give them out posthumously.The only way he’s getting nominated for a Nobel is posthumously, and then only if there is verifiable proof that he was the one responsible.
—Patrick
Wow, the guy who threatened to commit war crimes is upset that he didn't get a Peace prize....
This rant is just because Obama has a Nobel Peace prize & you don't isn't it?
<thatsthejoke.gif>They don't give them out posthumously.
So thats how I should've been phrasing it.If elected, I would declare every single member of the military, active and reserves, guilty of dereliction of duty for not dragging this creature out of the WH.
Doocey and Kilmeade over at Fox and Fools are Too Stupid To Live. They were like "could you imagine if WE did that!?" And Geraldo, GERALDO of all people, had to go, "um, guys. We did."
Am I missing something? Isn't that the point? If the Iranian government shut down the internet, it would be hard to monitor abuses. If they did that, you could probably assume abuses were going on, and that's bad. Trump is saying don't do that, that would be bad. I'm not seeing the problem here.Let's play a game: Is it an example of "Republicans don't understand technology", or "Republicans only pretend to support democracy"?
Trump tweeted, in Persian, a message to the Iranian government, the Google translation is, "The Iranian government should allow human rights groups to monitor and report on the current reality of protests in the Iranian people. We should not see the peaceful killing of protesters again or the Internet shut down. The world is watching."
Shutting down the internet would only serve to make it even harder for human rights groups to get their message out to the world. I'm not even sure how Trump plans to do such a thing, either.
Nevermind, I misread the sentence. I thought Trump was threatening to shut down the internet if they didn't stop killing protestors.Am I missing something? Isn't that the point? If the Iranian government shut down the internet, it would be hard to monitor abuses. If they did that, you could probably assume abuses were going on, and that's bad. Trump is saying don't do that, that would be bad. I'm not seeing the problem here.
Considering the source, it's possible. He's just that stupid.Nevermind, I misread the sentence. I thought Trump was threatening to shut down the internet if they didn't stop killing protestors.
It's also machine translated, so who knows how it was originally worded.Considering the source, it's possible. He's just that stupid.
In this case, accurately translating Trump's words is the worst possible scenario, so we gotta hope we get lucky and the machine fucks up enough that a different meaning is implied.Speaking as a professional translator, using machine translation to conduct diplomacy is about as good an idea as trying to fix a blockage in your septic system by randomly banging on it as hard as you can with a monkey wrench. Best case scenario, you get lucky and it works. Worst case scenario, you're knee deep in shit.
Let me be clear that I posted an English translation of a tweet that was originally sent out in what Google translate said was Persian. I took the tweet and had it machine translated. I have no idea how the language in the tweet was crafted, and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump didn't have a hand in it at all.Speaking as a professional translator, using machine translation to conduct diplomacy is about as good an idea as trying to fix a blockage in your septic system by randomly banging on it as hard as you can with a monkey wrench. Best case scenario, you get lucky and it works. Worst case scenario, you're knee deep in shit.
Ah, I misread and thought Trump had used machine translation. Which, admittedly, does sound like the kind of thing he'd do.Let me be clear that I posted an English translation of a tweet that was originally sent out in what Google translate said was Persian. I took the tweet and had it machine translated. I have no idea how the language in the tweet was crafted, and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump didn't have a hand in it at all.
Included in that are some messages that seem suspiciously like talk of having someone killed.
I don't think anyone actually believes Collins will go against the grain at this point anyways.Reminder that every single Republican is a two-faced, lying sack of dishonesty.
Collins rejects new evidence in Trump trial after saying she'd welcome it
"Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said on Wednesday she doesn't think newly released evidence, which happens to show Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump were deeply involved in the effort to force Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, should be allowed at the Senate impeachment trial."
.....
"When reporters reminded Collins of that fact that Parnas just released documents to House investigators yesterday, she replied, 'Well, doesn't that suggest that the House did an incomplete job then?' "
Yeah, just keep on moving those goal posts....