Damn, guess I'm doing it wrong.... rly:Shepherd's Pie is not really a pie... and it isn't really made from shepherds!
Or kicked out.Girl Scout cookies aren't made from Girl Scouts.
And eating brownies can get you jailed.
except in the case of reproduction where 1+1 begets a third.[/QUOTE]1+1=2
Bowling pins are made to fall. If they gained sentience, they would probably be very depressed by that fact.
except in the case of reproduction where 1+1 begets a third.[/QUOTE]1+1=2
Hypothetical question time:
You stumble upon a thread started by someone else that is similar in nature to about a hundred threads you've started before. The thread you found, however, is more open-ended and has no immediate promise of egotistical bullshit.
What do you do?
God is love.Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Knowledge = power.
God knows everything.
If God is all-knowing, then He/She/It also must be all-powerful. If He/She/It has absolute power, then He/She/It must also be absolutely corrupt.
Therefore, God is the ultimate evil.
How can you say such things after the wisdom of the anal gasses has been presented to you?We know about shit all. Look at some mold growing in the cracks of a rock somewhere. That is what humanity is to the universe. Some weird growth inhabiting a weird dimple in spacetime that is Earth.
We can't figure out if light is a particle or a wave, a failure which I think has a lot to do with our own limited capabilities of understanding (remember the mold). We still haven't figured gravity out completely.
Not saying we'll never understand better. But shit, man. The more you know, the stupider you feel.
Well, not strictly true. We know exactly whether it is a particle or a wave. It's both. And neither.We know about shit all. Look at some mold growing in the cracks of a rock somewhere. That is what humanity is to the universe. Some weird growth inhabiting a weird dimple in spacetime that is Earth.
We can't figure out if light is a particle or a wave, a failure which I think has a lot to do with our own limited capabilities of understanding (remember the mold). We still haven't figured gravity out completely.
Not saying we'll never understand better. But shit, man. The more you know, the stupider you feel.
Point is: it doesn't quite fit into anything we understand. It can't be 'both and neither.' It has to be something else that we as a race have no experience with. But we can only understand it as 'both and neither.'Well, not strictly true. We know exactly whether it is a particle or a wave. It's both. And neither.
Yeah, Physics doesn't make sense, but don't confuse that with not knowing the answer to the question
Point is: it doesn't quite fit into anything we understand. It can't be 'both and neither.' It has to be something else that we as a race have no experience with. But we can only understand it as 'both and neither.'Well, not strictly true. We know exactly whether it is a particle or a wave. It's both. And neither.
Yeah, Physics doesn't make sense, but don't confuse that with not knowing the answer to the question
If you smoke in a smoking jacket, and you eat in a dinner jacket, why are windbreakers so popular?Fun fact: The parkway driveway thing has been done before in this thread twice now.
Fun fact: Pojo doesn't read the thread before he posts.Fun fact: You cannot park on a parkway, and do not drive on a driveway
I named all of mine. Harold is my favorite.Your eyelashes are home to hundreds of mites.
I named all of mine. Harold is my favorite.Your eyelashes are home to hundreds of mites.
Including Alaska? That's insane.the furthest you can get from a McDonald's in the US is a 107 miles.
Including Alaska? That's insane.[/quote]the furthest you can get from a McDonald's in the US is a 107 miles.
I named all of mine. Harold is my favorite.Your eyelashes are home to hundreds of mites.
Oldest English settlement. Saint Augustine Florida, San Juan Puerto Rico, and Santo Domingo Dominican Republic are all older.It's probably just the continental US.
More fun facts! The Newfoundland edition:
St. John's, Newfoundlandis also the oldest European settlement in North America.
George St. in the downtown core has the highest number of bars per square foot in the world (outside of Ireland)
Oldest English settlement. Saint Augustine Florida, San Juan Puerto Rico, and Santo Domingo Dominican Republic are all older.[/QUOTE]More fun facts! The Newfoundland edition:
St. John's, Newfoundlandis also the oldest European settlement in North America.
George St. in the downtown core has the highest number of bars per square foot in the world (outside of Ireland)
Let me start by saying that I'm not trying to bash St. John's. I'm all for the acknowledgement of Newfoundlands significant history. It tears me when a history channel documentary labels Jamestown as the oldest settlement.San Juan and Santo Domingo are both older, but I wouldn't really call them North American. I'm also ignoring a few settlements in Mexico. Perhaps I'm being a little selective.
As far as the other goes ...
St. Augustine: 1565
St. John's 1541
But, we also have the oldest European settlement in any of the Americas, but it wasn't continuously inhabited. L'Anse aux Meadows, aka 'Vinland.' Circa 1000 A.D.
Let me start by saying that I'm not trying to bash St. John's. I'm all for the acknowledgement of Newfoundlands significant history. It tears me when a history channel documentary labels Jamestown as the oldest settlement.
This is my map of North America.
I'll be happy to disard PR and DR if you want. Also we can cut out virtually all cities everywhere else. The Spanish tended to settle in places that were already inhabited. Mexico City became a municipality of Spain in 1524, but it was an established city. My city also has no founding date. It was incorporated (wherein a city charter was written) in 1775, however Spaniards had been living there since at least the 1540s and possibly the 1520s and natives for quite a long time (off and on for 12k and potentially upwards of 3500 years prior of continuous habitation). I think you'll agree that they don't count in this context.
However, even by the pages that you listed St John's appears on a map in 1541, but it wasn't established until 1583. Lots of places appear on maps years before they're settled, that's usually how people find it after their drunk ass cousin comes back and jokingly tells them how awesome it is. That includes St Augustine which has an establishment date of 1565. I think it's interesting that St Aggies is the county seat of St. John's county. Talk about lazy landmark naming.
As far as L'Anse aux Meadows. You won't find argument here. That's a bad ass place. And to this silly little archaeologist is probably one of the coolest sites in the new world.
I hear you. You've plenty reason to dick wave. According to that one link you do have the oldest street on the continent. That's actually kind of cool. I was never into 'monumental' archaeology/history. Sure big pyramids are cool and all, but I like the mundane things you find or read about.Cool, cool. It's mostly just half-foolish dickwaving on my part anyhow.
I had a conversation a few months back about continents and how we define them. The link you provided is what I was taught, but I've since seen maps that exclude everything south of the US-Mexico border. I'm not sure I like that, but it's a lot easier to wave my dick without Latin America getting in the way.
Truthfully, I had to look up the date for St. John's. I didn't know it off the top of my head. I was sure I learned that there was a definite foundation date, where the king signed a charter or somesuch, but my google-fu (or wiki-fu as the case may be) was pretty weak while trying to look it up.
[EDIT] Derp! "On August 5 [1583], Sir Humphrey Gilbert claimed the area as England's first overseas colony under Royal Charter of Queen Elizabeth I." (From Wikipedia)[/EDIT]
And honestly, I'm glad to be arguing with someone other then Quebecois about the whole 'who's city is older' bit. Quebec has a 'We're 400 years old!' party for Quebec City the other year, and all of us here in St. John's just rolled our eyes at the damn foolish youngsters.
Also, what it is it with you and Hops?
Only if you can't multitask.fag break means something entirely different to my UK friends, as I found out this AM.
Fun Fact: I don't care!Fun fact: The parkway driveway thing has been done before in this thread twice now.
I...I never considered that. I wonder what else you can combine like that.You can make a tripple stacked cheeseburger with bacon & all condiments for $2.
Go-->Wendys-->Order double stack + jr bacon cheeseburger
Combine and enjoy the savings
I...I never considered that. I wonder what else you can combine like that.[/QUOTE]You can make a tripple stacked cheeseburger with bacon & all condiments for $2.
Go-->Wendys-->Order double stack + jr bacon cheeseburger
Combine and enjoy the savings
I...I never considered that. I wonder what else you can combine like that.[/quote]You can make a tripple stacked cheeseburger with bacon & all condiments for $2.
Go-->Wendys-->Order double stack + jr bacon cheeseburger
Combine and enjoy the savings
This doesn't make any sense.Astronauts are not allowed to eat beans before they go into space because passing wind in a spacesuit damages them
This doesn't make any sense.Astronauts are not allowed to eat beans before they go into space because passing wind in a spacesuit damages them
I wouldn't know where to confirm this, but here's another Trombone fact a music student once informed me of:The first trombone was known as the sacbutt.
Heh, I actually heard this once before and looked it up. Totally true.I read somewhere that a hyena's clitoris becomes so engorged that it could crush its offspring during birth.
The spotted hyena has a very big clitoris, named pseudopenis. It is by far the largest clitoris in the animal kingdom. In these hyenas, the vulva is fused, and the clitoris is used for urination, mating (it contracts for mating and the opening widens to allow the penetration by the male's penis) and giving birth. To complicate it all, the females also possess a fake scrotum made by the enlarged joined vulva and pseudo-testes filled with fatty tissue.
Sorry, no "J" in Hebrew. Yeshua would be a closer transliteration.A direct translation from Hebrew to English would be 'Joshua.'
Hmm, I'll have to look further into this. What I can figure out is that when referring to Jacob from the Old Testament it's Iakob, and when referring to various James in the NT, it's Iakobos. So it's not the same name, though how it got transferred from ee-ak'-o-bos to James, I don't know.And finally, another bible name. I am unable to confirm this, but I have been told that the name 'James' in the New Testament is a result of politics. The name should have been rendered 'Jacob,' but they fudged it in order to appease the king (essentially writing him into the bible). I really hope this one is true, because that would mean 'Jesus' should have been 'Joshua' (my name), and his brother 'James' should have been 'Jacob' (which is my brother's).
Sorry, no "J" in Hebrew. Yeshua would be a closer transliteration.[/quote]A direct translation from Hebrew to English would be 'Joshua.'
Hmm, I'll have to look further into this. What I can figure out is that when referring to Jacob from the Old Testament it's Iakob, and when referring to various James in the NT, it's Iakobos. So it's not the same name, though how it got transferred from ee-ak'-o-bos to James, I don't know.[/QUOTE]And finally, another bible name. I am unable to confirm this, but I have been told that the name 'James' in the New Testament is a result of politics. The name should have been rendered 'Jacob,' but they fudged it in order to appease the king (essentially writing him into the bible). I really hope this one is true, because that would mean 'Jesus' should have been 'Joshua' (my name), and his brother 'James' should have been 'Jacob' (which is my brother's).
Sorry, no "J" in Hebrew. Yeshua would be a closer transliteration.[/quote]A direct translation from Hebrew to English would be 'Joshua.'
Hmm, I'll have to look further into this. What I can figure out is that when referring to Jacob from the Old Testament it's Iakob, and when referring to various James in the NT, it's Iakobos. So it's not the same name, though how it got transferred from ee-ak'-o-bos to James, I don't know.[/QUOTE]And finally, another bible name. I am unable to confirm this, but I have been told that the name 'James' in the New Testament is a result of politics. The name should have been rendered 'Jacob,' but they fudged it in order to appease the king (essentially writing him into the bible). I really hope this one is true, because that would mean 'Jesus' should have been 'Joshua' (my name), and his brother 'James' should have been 'Jacob' (which is my brother's).