Isn't Raza gong to wild anyways? So meh.The other two are still playable, they’re just no longer the game-changers/-enders the way they used to be. So off to casual they go.
—Patrick
Isn't Raza gong to wild anyways? So meh.The other two are still playable, they’re just no longer the game-changers/-enders the way they used to be. So off to casual they go.
—Patrick
Patches rotates out too. In april, Whispers of the Old Gods, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, and One Night in Kharazan will all rotate out of standardIsn't Raza gong to wild anyways? So meh.
Yeah, that's why I said in my initial post that they were nerfing things going into wild as well as things staying in standard.[DOUBLEPOST=1517265751,1517265663][/DOUBLEPOST]Patches rotates out too. In april, Whispers of the Old Gods, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, and One Night in Kharazan will all rotate out of standard
Is the next expansion really not until April? Ugh, so many more months of cubelock.Patches rotates out too. In april, Whispers of the Old Gods, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, and One Night in Kharazan will all rotate out of standard
You're not going to do the daily quests?Hearthstone has 50 million players. 50,000 of them will get three packs. Oooh, so generous Blizzard. I know that's just costing you so much.
Have they actually said that these quests are any different than the usual daily quests? Because what I'm reading is that no one knows, and a lot of people are assuming special quests, while I've taken it to mean that it's the normal daily quests that give you your daily entry into the contest.You're not going to do the daily quests?
Oh, and the big "winner" of 3,000 packs can expect to pay over $2,000 in state and local taxes for their prize.
View attachment 26635
It's the logical extrapolation of sweepstakes rules. Any time you win a big prize in a sweepstakes, if you accept the prize you owe taxes on it. The exact numbers could be wrong, but the general concept isn't.Well, if reddit says it, it has to be true.
Hearthstone cards don't have a monetary value, and you don't own them anyway. You don't buy cards with packs, you gamble* chances to acquire cards. You license an account to access them, blizzard retains all ownership. It's why they can change cards, remove cards, or shut down the game completely if they want.It's the logical extrapolation of sweepstakes rules. Any time you win a big prize in a sweepstakes, if you accept the prize you owe taxes on it. The exact numbers could be wrong, but the general concept isn't.
Except packs do, in fact, have a monetary value assigned to them.Hearthstone cards don't have a monetary value, and you don't own them anyway. You don't buy cards with packs, you gamble* chances to acquire cards. You license an account to access them, blizzard retains all ownership. It's why they can change cards, remove cards, or shut down the game completely if they want.
*Well, it's not considered gambling -yet-
Yeah, you go ahead and argue that the Fair Market Value of the packs are less than the ARV. I'm sure the IRS will be very understanding. You might be able to talk them down to whatever those packs would cost if you bought them with Amazon coins, but I doubt you could get any lower just because the goods are non-transferrable. Trips are non-transferrable, too, but are still taxed.Hearthstone cards don't have a monetary value, and you don't own them anyway. You don't buy cards with packs, you gamble* chances to acquire cards. You license an account to access them, blizzard retains all ownership. It's why they can change cards, remove cards, or shut down the game completely if they want.
*Well, it's not considered gambling -yet-
I didn't realize you were a tax law expert. My point is you are presenting as fact what is at the moment internet speculation. Could it be true? Sure, but we don't know yet. Reddit is not a good place to site as a source.Yeah, you go ahead and argue that the Fair Market Value of the packs are less than the ARV. I'm sure the IRS will be very understanding. You might be able to talk them down to whatever those packs would cost if you bought them with Amazon coins, but I doubt you could get any lower just because the goods are non-transferrable. Trips are non-transferrable, too, but are still taxed.
I'm guessing a tax attorney could answer this pretty swiftly, since it's probably already established how the FMV of a movie bought on iTunes relates to it's ARV and MSRP, but I can't find it by googling.
I'm presenting it as a probability. I'm pretty sure that Hollywood (as well as Microsoft and Apple) has already fought very hard to ensure that licsensed products have actual FMV, even if they are non-transferrable and accessible only through an online service. Do you really think that a copy of a movie bought on iTunes is untaxable? Do you think Amazon would sit idly by and let the FMV of Kindle Unlimited be valued at $0?I didn't realize you were a tax law expert. My point is you are presenting as fact what is at the moment internet speculation. Could it be true? Sure, but we don't know yet. Reddit is not a good place to site as a source.
[Dungeon Run] The cards that appear in several loot categories have been adjusted slightly.
I mean, it was mostly used to play witch + 6 free giants on turn 5.That witch nerf is gonna make the combo less combo-y. No more Witch + Ironbark Protector turns.
--Patrick
What? How? I thought playing the witch set all card costs to 5, even above all the other price-adjusting shenanigans.I mean, it was mostly used to play witch + 6 free giants on turn 5.
Nope, it makes the max cost of the giants 5, and then price reduces from there.What? How? I thought playing the witch set all card costs to 5, even above all the other price-adjusting shenanigans.
--Patrick
Not since an undocumented change in Patch 9.0.0.20457What? How? I thought playing the witch set all card costs to 5, even above all the other price-adjusting shenanigans.