I'm also glad to see they found a way to bring in FOUR Spider-man villains in one movie, and make it WORK....granted 2 were second stringers, and one was there for foreshadowing-BUT STILL!
You say that butI really liked it, good supporting cast, great villains-ALSO--best secret character EVER with MJ.
You say that butjust wait till Gas find's out that MJ isn't a redhead.
One thing I just thought of, and liked, regarding Tony Stark's statement on deserving the suit.
Pretty much every member of the Avengers has had moments where they didn't have their equipment and/or powers, and still had the heroism and determination and ability to do the right thing. Stark infiltrated the Mandarin's mansion in IM3 without his suit, armed only with jury-rigged weapons built from stuff he got from a hardware store. Rogers was standing up to bullies and volunteering to join the army back when he was a tiny weakling, and in fact it was this quality that convinced Dr. Erskine to let him receive the super soldier serum. Thor stood up to the Destroyer when he was stripped of his powers and couldn't wield Mjolnir. Banner returned to Harlem to challenge the Abomination despite not knowing if he could turn back into the Hulk. Wanda, along with her brother, volunteered for Strucker's experiments as a pair of normal teenagers, just on the off-chance that they'd survive and be able to help defend their homeland. Falcon returned to the Triskelion to take on Rumlow despite losing his wings.
Sandman was pretty good too, even if the movie he was in was pretty crap. I think what really makes these two good is they don't have the "Conquer the world" megalomaniacal angle, they have relatable motivations and down to earth origin stories, and you can understand - if not agree - with how they got where they are.I've been thinking, and I was really impressed with Keaton's Vulture. I think he was great as a villain, making him seem human and relatable while also making him menacing and interesting. I think he may be the best villain the MCU has ever had.
You can tell he was the villain Raimi actually wanted. I remember reading the studio wanted, and kept pushing for, Venom, and Raimi was stuck. I really think Spider-Man 3 would have been less maligned if the studio had just let Raimi do this thing.Sandman was pretty good too, even if the movie he was in was pretty crap. I think what really makes these two good is they don't have the "Conquer the world" megalomaniacal angle, they have relatable motivations and down to earth origin stories, and you can understand - if not agree - with how they got where they are.
I think focusing on Sandman alone, and cutting out the terrible Symbiote crap, would have saved that movie.You can tell he was the villain Raimi actually wanted. I remember reading the studio wanted, and kept pushing for, Venom, and Raimi was stuck. I really think Spider-Man 3 would have been less maligned if the studio had just let Raimi do this thing.
Hell, even just setting p Venom for the next film instead of cramming him in at the end would have done wonders.I think focusing on Sandman alone, and cutting out the terrible Symbiote crap, would have saved that movie.
Dude, he made the Vulture menacing. THE VULTURE! He's always been one of the lamer Spider-Man foes.
If they include Ned in Infinity War, I'll watch that movie five times in theaters. Even the combined Avengers and Guardians will need a guy in the chair.
Thanos has his stone throne, Ned has his wheeled office chair.Guuuuyyy in the chaaaaaiiiiirrrrrrr
Ooo! Ooo! Go grab Professor X and I smell ultimate* crossover!!Thanos has his stone throne, Ned has his wheeled office chair.
Sounds like a duel for the ages.
"How DARE you challenge me, boy! Who do you think you are? What do you think you could possibly do?"Thanos has his stone throne, Ned has his wheeled office chair.
Sounds like a duel for the ages.
Actually I think that's the best thing Ned could've said to the faculty member who caught him, because it's the most plausible explanation for a dude sitting alone in the dark in front of a computer. Sure, he'd get in trouble, but it's almost certain that no one would investigate further into what he was doing, which means they wouldn't find Peter's secret.Considering he was a minor, in a school, and talking to a teacher, he would have been better off if he'd said literally ANYTHING else.
Exactly. It was the one sure thing he could say that the teacher would believe and not dig deeper.Actually I think that's the best thing Ned could've said to the faculty member who caught him, because it's the most plausible explanation for a dude sitting alone in the dark in front of a computer. Sure, he'd get in trouble, but it's almost certain that no one would investigate further into what he was doing, which means they wouldn't find Peter's secret.
True. And from what I've seen, kids caught watching porn at school get a stern lecture and a short suspension. Relatively speaking it's a slap on the wrist.Exactly. It was the one sure thing he could say that the teacher would believe and not dig deeper.