What do you say, @Dave ? Should there be a "Dead" thread?Unless it's a huge celebrity, these things should all go in one thread.
We've had one before, and it sort of died off. Either people think someone's important enough to merit a thread, or they tend to not post.What do you say, @Dave ? Should there be a "Dead" thread?
If we move toward that model, I vote for it to be in the "Health and Advice" category.
--Patrick
Well, let us be thankful we haven't had to have one for a fellow forumite for some time.Food for thought... 9 of the last 40 updated topics are Brazeltons.[14 of the last 50.
28%
As I said, it ended with the creation of a "small deaths" thread, which quickly died of its own.I feel like we've had this discussion before, but I can't remember how it concluded.
So @stienman would have his own threadBirth threads! Post about new people being born!
NBC is blocked by the brutal Canadian Supremacy Regime. Jay only sees MooseNews.com now and Halforums.Alright, sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to check with @Jay to see if someone was notable enough to create a thread about. I thought someone who got a front page story on NBCnews.com was worthy of a thread, but I guess not.
To be fair, those two combined give him all the news you might possibly need out three in the frozen wastes.NBC is blocked by the brutal Canadian Supremacy Regime. Jay only sees MooseNews.com now and Halforums.
It's ok. We both know his real motivation was to corral all the [Brazelton] stuff into one single thread so he could more conveniently ignore it.Alright, sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to check with @Jay to see if someone was notable enough to create a thread about. I thought someone who got a front page story on NBCnews.com was worthy of a thread, but I guess not.
Firstly, I don't get why you folks need to get so uppity about my comment. You plebs. I'm clearly not stating you need to check with me if you need to create a thread here... albeit, now that you brought it up...it should be encouraged....Alright, sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to check with @Jay to see if someone was notable enough to create a thread about. I thought someone who got a front page story on NBCnews.com was worthy of a thread, but I guess not.
Well, I was going to, but now I'm not gonna.But hey, that's just me and everyone can proceed on clicking the passive aggressive icon.
No one rated your post as Informative, and that's definitely the most passive aggressive rating icon we have.[DOUBLEPOST=1461555365,1461554767][/DOUBLEPOST]See?!But hey, that's just me and everyone can proceed on clicking the passive aggressive icon.
Well, considering this is not the first time you have suggested stopping the Brazelton threads and they are still here, might I suggest you grow a thicker skin and just ignore them? Basic forum rule, if you don't like a thread or don't want to read about something, DON'T CLICK ON IT.Firstly, I don't get why you folks need to get so uppity about my comment. You plebs. I'm clearly not stating you need to check with me if you need to create a thread here... albeit, now that you brought it up...it should be encouraged....
Secondly, NBC'whatever' is where your particular issue lies. If YOU'RE getting news from NBCNEWS and the wife of a somewhat known comedian has died due to natural causes is headline news, I can GUARANTEE you there's far more newsworthy things happening out there. I for one, don't give a damn, life is short enough as it is and don't need a quarter of the threads in this sub-forum filled with death and misfortune.
My suggestion can be taken into consideration or not, it doesn't matter to me, I wonder now why I bothered, this place just makes me sad. Oh well.
But hey, that's just me and everyone can proceed on clicking the passive aggressive icon.
What I've noticed most is that, unlike most other fora, ours is not about a specific theme. People always ask me, "You're always on that forum. What's it about?" And then I have to stare blankly and reply, "What isn't it about?"Unlike many (most?) forums, we have huge threads under which most content fits.
Nerd culture? Not just geek culture though, or sports wouldn't fit There's sports nerd and game nerds and photo nerds and politics nerds and nerdy nerds andWhat I've noticed most is that, unlike most other fora, ours is not about a specific theme. People always ask me, "You're always on that forum. What's it about?" And then I have to stare blankly and reply, "What isn't it about?"
--Patrick
Fewer baby pictures, though.This place is closer to a baby Facebook.
And more erotic ones. All in all, an improvement, I must say.Fewer baby pictures, though.
Thank goodness.
--Patrick
It's a self-reinforcing cycle thing, though. Because there are so few active threads, the threshold for new threads is higher. Plus, some of us may feel whatever they post isn't worth a separate thread, anyway. I know I tend to feel that way.I think steinman has a good point. For convenience sake, we have a movie news thread, when sometimes movies merit their own thread and don't get them. Same with some video games; that forum is like three threads constantly updating, with not much other traffic because all significance goes under the Video Game News. Some threads I think it makes sense (what movie did you last see, the rant threads) but when stuff comes up, instead of finding its place in the random thread, it might be worth using the New Post function, even if it ends up being a thread that dies in a week or so.
Imgur's "upgrade" was definitely a case of fixing what wasn't broken.I really, really hate the new Imgur system. I can't open the album on Imgur itself, I can't resize this to actually get the full text. Can't read the last part of the first message, can't read the last bit of the second...*sigh*
No, since I don't see an Imgur logo. I see the button in the top right, but it doesn't open a menu.Clicking the imgur logo takes me to the album on Imgur. Doesn't work for you?
It's on Facebook, just search... My link was weird. Trying again.No, since I don't see an Imgur logo. I see the button in the top right, but it doesn't open a
All I see is a big empty blank space.It's on Facebook, just search... My link was weird. Trying again.
Sorry if you're using Tapatalk, I can't get it to NOT auto media embed.
Thanks, grief.
Thanks for making depression look like the buzzing little bully it always was. Depression is the tallest kid in the 4th grade, dinging rubber bands off the back of your head and feeling safe on the playground, knowing that no teacher is coming to help you.
But grief? Grief is Jason Statham holding that 4th grade bully's head in a toilet and then fucking the teacher you've got a crush on in front of the class. Grief makes depression cower behind you and apologize for being such a dick.
If you spend 102 days completely focused on ONE thing you can achieve miracles. Make a film, write a novel, get MMA ripped, kick heroin, learn a language, travel around the world. Fall in love with someone. Get 'em to love you back.
But 102 days at the mercy of grief and loss feels like 102 years and you have shit to show for it. You will not be physically healthier. You will not feel "wiser." You will not have "closure." You will not have "perspective" or "resilience" or "a new sense of self." You WILL have solid knowledge of fear, exhaustion and a new appreciation for the randomness and horror of the universe. And you'll also realize that 102 days is nothing but a warm-up for things to come.
And...
You will have been shown new levels of humanity and grace and intelligence by your family and friends. They will show up for you, physically and emotionally, in ways which make you take careful note, and say to yourself, "Make sure to try to do that for someone else someday." Complete strangers will send you genuinely touching messages on Facebook and Twitter, or will somehow figure out your address to send you letters which you'll keep and re-read 'cause you can't believe how helpful they are. And, if you're a parent? You'll wish you were your kid's age, because the way they embrace despair and joy are at a purer level that you're going to have to reconnect with, to reach backwards through years of calcified cynicism and ironic detachment.
Lose your cool, and you're saved.
Michelle McNamara got yanked off the planet and out of life 102 days ago. She left behind an amazing unfinished book, about a horrific series of murders that everyone -- including the retired homicide detectives she worked with -- was sure she'd solve. The Golden State Killer. She gave him that name, in an article for Los Angeles Magazine. She was going to figure out the real name behind it.
She left Alice, her 7 year-old daughter. But not before putting the best parts of her into Alice, like beautiful music burned onto a CD and sent out into the void on a spaceship.
And she left me. 102 days into this.
I was face-down and frozen for weeks. It's 102 days later and I can confidently say I have reached a point where I'm crawling. Which, objectively, is an improvement. Maybe 102 days later I'll be walking.
Any spare energy I've managed to summon since April 21st I've put toward finishing Michelle's book. With a lot of help from some very amazing people. It will come out. I will let you know. It's all her. We're just taking what's there and letting it tell us how to shape it. It's amazing.
And I'm going to start telling jokes again soon. And writing. And acting in stuff and making things I like and working with friends on projects and do all the stuff I was always so privileged to get to do before the air caught fire around me and the sun died. It's all I knew how to do before I met Michelle. I don't know what else I'm supposed to do now without her.
And not because, "It's what Michelle would have wanted me to do." For me to even presume to know what Michelle would have wanted me to do is the height of arrogance on my part. That was one of the many reasons I so looked forward to growing old with her. Because she was always surprising me. Because I never knew what she'd think or what direction she'd go.
Okay, I'll start being funny again soon. What other choice do I have? Reality is in a death spiral and we seem to be living in a cackling, looming nightmare-swamp. We're all being dragged into a shadow-realm of doom by hateful lunatics who are determined to send our planet careening into oblivion.
Hey, there's that smile I was missing!
Thank you. It used to be the little gear in the top right corner, but that stopped working and I never thought to click the top left.[DOUBLEPOST=1470158679,1470158488][/DOUBLEPOST]. . . Except on my tablet, imgur wont load anything for meClicking the imgur logo takes me to the album on Imgur. Doesn't work for you?
Yeah, they said the autopsy results might not get looked at until the Fall.Did anyone ever say how she died? I tried looking it up earlier and came up short.
You're just saying that because you know someone in a similar situation.That hurt to read. A lot.
You can think the cake is a lie while also wishing you could have a slice. Not every atheist is of the Hitchens type, yannowHere he is winning an Emmy last night:
An odd thing for him to say, I must admit, given his fairly vocal stance as an atheist.
I've met many an atheist who would love to be wrong about the whole Heaven thing. They don't believe it's true, but they'd love to be wrong.An odd thing for him to say, I must admit, given his fairly vocal stance as an atheist.
Aye. I'm rather certain it ain't true, and I'd certainly love to be wrong.I've met many an atheist who would love to be wrong about the whole Heaven thing. They don't believe it's true, but they'd love to be wrong.
Interesting. Might be a language thing, but to me hoping is passive, while wishing is active (and thus 'stronger').I get your points, but "I hope" is stronger than "I wish" or "It'd sure be nice" to my ears.
We don't always pick the most cromulent word.I get your points, but "I hope" is stronger than "I wish" or "It'd sure be nice" to my ears.