Stacked against them due to endless political machinations. Go ahead and read everything that I have said in this thread so far (notice I didn't say ''re-read'') and then come back and pick up the rest of this post.Bowielee said:I'm talking about honest hard working people who can't make it in a system that's inherently stacked against them.
See, every time a stupid, corrupt and morally bankrupt politician (all of them) makes a stupid, corrupt and morally bankrupt decision (all of them) on legislation, rule of law or even which prostitute to spend taxpayer money on, we look a little less like the America that the founders intended. Because we have moved so far away from self reliance and the expectation of resposibility on a personal level that the government tells us when to look and when to leap, what we can and cannot do in our jobs, in our business and even in our personal lives.
Like I said, the Amerika we inhabit today bears little resemblance to what the founders intended.
The government which governs least, governs best. The more involved the feds get, the larger the federal government grows and the more difficult it becomes to succeed through our own efforts. The message here is that the states need to take back the rights that were always intended to be state's rights and the federal government needs to be largely dismantled, until it vaguely resembles what was set forth in the constitution of the United States of America.
I have gotten so far from the intent of this thread... The way to fix the health care problem is to kick out all the illegal immigrants (enforce existing laws), force people to pay their doctor bills (the cause of inflation of medical service costs) and move to a more efficient method of treatment and record keeping (sharing medical info between providers via the web, just like Obama wants, can't believe I am agreeing with him but it's a good idea). I also like the idea of medical savings accounts that start at birth and rollover to your heirs at death. Might work, might not, but it deserves consideration at the very least.
-- Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:16 pm --
Nobody is advocating withholding treatment from the poor. Making a way for that treatment to get paid for, that is the crux of the discussion. I paid off my student loans at $50 a month. That is just one option out of millions that don't call for socialization of medicine, which is just a way for politicians to increase their power.Denbrought said:A few posts ago you called somebody out in being apathetic (the FTFY post). Now you're the one being a defeatist. People like to live walking towards ideals, and today's collective ego has chosen to not let someone die puking blood on the sidewalk because they couldn't afford their treatment, even though it was available to them. This isn't about hungry people next to empty stores (yadda yadda starving african children) but the ones we have resources to help and the proximity to not be easy to ignore them.