I would totally understand, like some of the Wikileaks threads we've had, if people were actually hanging on because they feel strongly about the actual topic. But it's become (again) about Charlie.
I think that's a great idea, except that unlike Gasbandit, I doubt Charlie would cooperate, because he's stated his purpose on the site now is to rankle people and be annoying. He's not about having discussion or discourse like Gas clearly wanted; he's about being contrary and antagonistic, and getting people uppity. He doesn't care that they only turn against him and his cause, even if they were people who would've been on his side had he bothered approaching the discussion like an adult. He just wants the attention and the noise.
You haven't proven that in court, you murdering savage! Now there will be a precedent for killing terrorists who bomb innocent civilians, and I don't want think about what President Gingrich will do with these powers.
I think it is all about the presentation. I post couple of "controversial" thread also, but it didn't get into a heated argument on my views. So maybe you are doing something differently.
No, I was referring to mainstream political reaction to this occurrence.
It is kinda scary tho. I mean if the article is 100% legit, then a president and a secret panel CAN condemn a U.S. citizen to death.
We need the motherfucking Batman to swoop in and "extradite" people on our behalf.
