Export thread

Playboy. Relevant Again? For a moment anyway....

#1

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/07/showbiz/lindsay-lohan-playboy/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

The first of "my" child stars to hit the full nude scene (Jamiee Foxxworth doesn't really count). Now I was already in Chris Hansen territory when Lohan got super sexy, but I crushed on her "back then" none the less. She's definitely fallen out of the world's good graces and her looks have taken a massive hit. However, with some clean up I think this could have the potential to both re-fire up her career (if she keeps it together after this shoot) as well as finally give me something to oogle other than some paparazzi shots.

I'm sure it won't be THIS good:
but one can hope.

I honestly thought one of the Olsen Twins was going to do it first, but they're still ridiculously rich.


#2

Espy

Espy

Oh yeah, I saw this on CNN.com this morning:
llpb.png


#3

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

That quote by Gabourey doesn't make a bit of sense.


#4

Jay

Jay

DO NOT WANT ROFL


#5

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

Guess I'm the only one eh?


#6

Thread Necromancer

Thread Necromancer

Not the only one Shegs, but my interest is more along the lines of "train wreck" interest.


#7

Null

Null

The only interest I have in Playboy at the moment is that Jenny Poussin - the one I made the scale bikini for - did a shoot for them a few weeks ago. Note to self: find out which issue she's gonna be in.


#8

Espy

Espy

That quote by Gabourey doesn't make a bit of sense.
Re-read it then watch this:
preciousstealingchicken.gif


#9

phil

phil

The only interest I have in Playboy at the moment is that Jenny Poussin - the one I made the scale bikini for - did a shoot for them a few weeks ago. Note to self: find out which issue she's gonna be in.
Can't afford to miss it. Just get a 2 year subscription now.


#10

GasBandit

GasBandit

Guys, as king of the Image Hoarders, I happily can say I've managed to snag advance proofs of the photo sessions, and I'm sharing them with you:

.








#11

ThatNickGuy

ThatNickGuy

Ugh, why bother? It's going to be photoshopped and airbrushed to the point she'll be unrecognizeable. I used to get excited when a WWE Diva would pose, but you can barely even tell it's them by the time Playboy's done with them.


#12

BananaHands

BananaHands

Yeah, I'd consider Playboy being relevant if Lindsay posing nude was relevant at all.

Two years ago? Yeah. I'd be on that train. Now? There's been enough twat-shots, clothing malfunctions and general decay that makes it nothing appealing.

Buuuut, honestly if there was a sex tape? I'd download it.


#13

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

You know you're still going to see the pics ;)


#14

Jay

Jay

Probably, then I'll wonder how much of a bonus the air brush artist got this time around.


#15

Ravenpoe

Ravenpoe

Back in the day Lohan? I'd be all over that.

But current Lohan? Who the hell am I kidding, I'd still be all over it.


#16



Chibibar

I am gonna pick up a copy :)


#17

BananaHands

BananaHands

You know you're still going to see the pics ;)
I know. :whistling:

And I'll probably pick up a copy too. :facepalm:


#18

Kovac

Kovac

I would pay money not to see it


#19

phil

phil

I'll get a copy and send you pieces of the pictures until you pay me to stop.


#20

Frank

Frankie Williamson

Didn't she already do a nude Marilyn Monroe spread?


#21

redthirtyone

redthirtyone

So wait, what? Machete doesn't count?

Edit: nm guess it doesn't. Was aware the Jessica Alba stuff was faked, but a quick looksie on the interwebs seems to lead one to believe Lohan's stuff was too. Dunno


#22

Adam

Adammon

Nude attractive female? I'm there.


#23

Cat

Cat

Will keep an eye out but not my hopes up.


#24

HCGLNS

HCGLNS

How will these photos be different than the nude Vogue pictures? And no it will not resurrect her career.


#25

GasBandit

GasBandit

How will these photos be different than the nude Vogue pictures? And no it will not resurrect her career.
Nips and vag?


#26

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

It's Playboy, so no vag, just a hint of beaver.


#27

rac3r_x

rac3r_x

Amazing how house quickly the house begins to fall apart with a bad foundation



And its painted with too much booze and drugs.


#28

GasBandit

GasBandit

It's Playboy, so no vag, just a hint of beaver.
As God as my witness, I have seen vag in playboy!


#29

Cheesy1

Cheesy1

Sorry Gas, that was only an armpit close-up.


#30

Gusto

Gusto

Remember the time HCGLNS dared me in the Truth or Dare thread to list my Top 5 Playmates of the Month of all time?

That was a fun night.


#31

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

I've not picked up one of those mags in 15 years, but for the longest time they kept to the standard of no vag shots.

It is not Pent Up (house) magazine that half the shots are nothing but vag.


#32

GasBandit

GasBandit

I've not picked up one of those mags in 15 years, but for the longest time they kept to the standard of no vag shots.

It is not Pent Up (house) magazine that half the shots are nothing but vag.
No, that's true. Penthouse was practically a gyno manual. The vag in playboy was rare, but occasionally it was there, oh yes it was.


#33

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

GasB is right, there was definitely some very clear shots in Playboy for quite a few of the centerfolds.


#34

Adam

Adammon

The difference between Playboy and Penthouse is similar to the difference between Car and Driver and Motortrend. One magazine shows you a nice package where you can eye the curves and appreciate the beauty of good design, the other shows you the insides.


#35

Jax

Jax

Nude attractive female? I'm there.
Don't we already have a subforum for that? ;) One that is not getting much action, I might ad...

(Sooooouuuunds liiiiike....)


#36

Steve

Steve

Mean Girls Lohan I'd so be there. This Lohan I'll pass. It's a shame, too, because at her prime she was smokin'.


#37

Null

Null

Mean Girls Lohan I'd so be there. This Lohan I'll pass. It's a shame, too, because at her prime she was smokin'.
Wasn't she underage then? :confused:


#38

phil

phil

Wasn't she underage then? :confused:
3 months, according to IMDB. More if you consider that it was probably filmed a better part of a year before it's actual release.

However, as far as I can tell it was filmed in Canada, which has a legal age of 16. Thus, if Steve were to find himself transported to 2004 and had an opportunity to hit it, it would be legal though still frowned upon publicly (with bro fives had all around in private)


#39

GasBandit

GasBandit

Ain't nothin' by a number. Evolutionarily speaking, we're a bare bat of an eyelash away from when girls were married and pregnant at 14.

(of course, that's because saber-toothed tigers generally killed anyone before they made 25)


#40

PatrThom

PatrThom

The difference between Playboy and Penthouse is similar to the difference between Car and Driver and Motortrend. One magazine shows you a nice package where you can eye the curves and appreciate the beauty of good design, the other shows you the insides.
I have several treasured back-issues of Playboy. They rest packed away securely alongside grade school report cards, HS/college diplomas, the comics with the last Sunday edition of Calvin & Hobbes, a first edition copy of the first Fantasy novel I ever read, photos of departed pets, and my chunk of the Berlin Wall I scooped up off the ground in the Fall of '89.

I have no copies of any Penthouse magazine.

--Patrick


#41

BananaHands

BananaHands



#42

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

Probably means she wasn't "healthy" enough yet. I'm okay with this.


#43

GasBandit

GasBandit

Heh, in other words, she looks so much like shit warmed over that no amount of airbrushing can fix her, so they need to detox and forcefeed her until she looks at least mildly appealing again.


#44



Chibibar

I thought they did the reshoot already?


#45

GasBandit

GasBandit

I just find it funny that, if that article's implication is to be believed, Lohan was given time ahead of having to go to jail, expressly so that she could pose for playboy. Was the judge a subscriber, I wonder?


#46

Gryfter

Gryfter

I just find it funny that, if that article's implication is to be believed, Lohan was given time ahead of having to go to jail, expressly so that she could pose for playboy. Was the judge a subscriber, I wonder?
That's the power of the Hef.


#47

Dei

Dei

I see in the paper all the time that Person X has so many days in which to report to jail to start their sentence. So I don't think it's out of the ordinary. She already served her jail time anyways. It was only a few hours. GG California and your overcrowded jails.


#48

Dave

Dave

Maybe she was so smoking hot that the photographer wanted to see her naked again.






:rofl:


#49

Null

Null

Found out the issue my friend's in is the November 2011 issue of Playboy... Estonia. *facepalm*


#50

drifter

drifter

Well, it's not like it won't end up on the internet eventually... unless you're dying for a dead tree edition.


#51

Null

Null

Well, it's not like it won't end up on the internet eventually... unless you're dying for a dead tree edition.
That would be ideal, you can't really get an autograph on a digital copy.


#52



Biannoshufu

Order from the Internet? I hear that they can do that now, using Internet gnomes and telephonic modems.


#53

Null

Null

I think it's rather amusing that I can find a dozen places to download it before the first site selling the paper copy comes up on a search.


#54



Chibibar

I think it's rather amusing that I can find a dozen places to download it before the first site selling the paper copy comes up on a search.
I am not surprised. The Internet usually have stuff posted within a couple of minutes after the actual event occurred.


#55

GasBandit

GasBandit

Yep. Googled em up. Waste of time. I feel like I want recompense for the minute amounts of energy it took for me to google them.


#56

Frank

Frankie Williamson

She even sucks at Playboy, shocking.


#57

Null

Null

Well, I'll say this much. Jenny looks fantastic in latex.


#58

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

Don't you mean silicon?


#59

Null

Null

Don't you mean silicon?
I think you mean silicone. My opinion is that she'd look better unaugmented, though she wants to get bigger implants, and well, it's her body.


#60

HCGLNS

HCGLNS

And to the surprise of no one, the entire issue has been leaked online today.


#61

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

Completely freakin fake (looking). They went for an "artsy/drawn" style of photography and it comes off as massively fake. What a complete disappointment.

What was I expecting?

*sigh*


#62

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

What was I expecting?

*sigh*
This?



#63

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

No. I wasn't expecting a horribly white washed (she has freckles? Can't tell with these photos.) more "drawn" than "photo" (I've seen more realistic photos drawn by Rule34 sites), blonde (never liked her blonde) barely nude (It's ALL topless only) photo shoot.

Complete and total failure.


#64

HCGLNS

HCGLNS

The pics just don't measure up. First by imitating Marilyn she gets instantly compared to her and falls very short. Second she looks out off it in every photon completely disinterested. Third the airbrushing is very obvious.

She falls to the classic Playboy pitfall, when the "star" looks worse than the Playmate.


#65

Officer_Charon

Officer_Charon

She falls to the classic Playboy pitfall, when the "star" looks worse than the Playmate.


#66

HCGLNS

HCGLNS

Anybody want a peanut?


#67

BananaHands

BananaHands

Whoever did the final touch-ups on these pictures really should have photoshopped her ass more consistently. There's one where it does a right angle.


#68

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

Honestly? I'd LOVE to see the originals. I bet they're better than these released "drawings".


#69

GasBandit

GasBandit

Here you go.



#70

BananaHands

BananaHands

Can we talk about her hand?
(nsfw)


#71

ThatNickGuy

ThatNickGuy

Christ, they pretty much photoshopped and airbrushed and whatever they do...to the point that she's not even recognizeable. If someone showed me pictures of that and then told me it was Lohan, I wouldn't believe them. Hell, even now, I still don't believe them.


#72

PatrThom

PatrThom

I didn't know "specular pink" was a color.

--Patrick


#73

Frank

Frankie Williamson

Man, she has a pretty rad pair, but fuck those are terrible pictures. The entire outline of her body looks artificial.


#74

Jay

Jay

Did they try to Marilyn her?


#75

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

They photoshopped/drew her facial features onto Marilyn's body.


#76

checkeredhat

checkeredhat

Bleached ridiculously blonde, clown-red lips, never been my thing. Beyond that, They photoshopped her beyond recognition (That was to be expected though.), and they shot it with high key lighting that they've gone and toned down the contrast on so everything looks like ass. I guess they were trying to make it look like a photograph from the 60s or 70s, but it doesn't work.
So yeah, pretty much everything about the shoot appears to be a failure, but that's pretty much in keeping with her idom.


#77

Mathias

Mathias

Man, that was an awful looking spread. You know who's picture set looked sexier? Scarlet's. Because it wasn't touched up fake-ass garbage.


#78

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

They photoshopped/drew her facial features onto Marilyn's body.
Na, her hooters are actually bigger than Marilyn's... They just tried as hard as the could to get her to look like Marilyn.


#79

Shegokigo

Shegokigo

It was sarcasm based on how that's not even remotely close to how her real body would look. It wasn't just a simple "photoshop touch up" they changed so much it might as well have not even been her.


#80

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

This month's Playboy... digital Hentia.


#81

Shegokigo

Shegokigo



#82

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

I feel disturbed to say, I like Marge's cans.


#83

Jay

Jay

The fuck did I just look at?


#84



BErt

What is this I don't even


#85

ThatNickGuy

ThatNickGuy

Homer's right. Marge has a butt that won't quit...mumble mumble...five bucks? Get outta here.


Top