See, I still maintain that Seattle would have kept their last team if more than 2k people went to the games on average in the last year or so that they were here; so all of the whining by "fans" that OKC stole the team, and that Howard Schultz is a horrible person for selling the team, and that Howard Stern is a hypocrite for allowing the moving of the Sonics but not the moving of the Kings is - while not surprising - incredibly amusing to me.
This is not a city that has die-hard fan bases that keep supporting teams while they slump. Hell, the Mariners just got done beating the Orioles in a 6 - 2 game that should have been a lot of fun to be at (lead off homer by Saunders in his first game back from the DL, complete game performance by the Mariners' pitcher, two or three double plays turned by our infielders, some good hits with runners in scoring position, including a triple by our 3rd baseman), and because the team's been struggling, the stadium was nearly empty. The Seahawks have a lot of fans at games now, but they've been making the playoffs for the past several seasons - they never had this kind of home-game support when they were putting up losing seasons; and the Sonics fans were the same way. Key Arena was packed to the rafters when the Sonics were winning, but they had trouble keeping it from looking completely empty in lean years, and it only holds 17k people. I wouldn't be at all surprised if most of the fans who actually attended games during the last couple years before the sale were fans of the visiting teams.
I seriously doubt that Seattle is going to get the Kings, and even with all of the hype surrounding the deal and all of the political talk of how important having an NBA team would be for the city, I'm not really all that certain that the city deserves to get one back right now.