I was trying to be polite, I use the portable feature to continue playing while I am on the can. as far as the portable systems go, I dont really see the point to buying a portable system you are going to only use at home, when I can use the wii for modern gaming plus scratching my retro gaming itch when I feel it without having to break my old systems and games out of storage.Just seems odd to pay so much more money for about the same thing if that's what it's to be used for, especially if you're carrying it to the kitchen or around the house.
that's not an issue for me as I have an extremely powerful PC, I dont have to settle for anything, The nintendo is for nintendo games and stuff I am not going to see on the PC, that looks like it would be fun to play. all the CoD and AC of the world will eventually show up on the PC, if they dont oh well no biggie.There's a difference between -being hardcore- and not settling for 7yr old graphics on a new system just because it morphs into a handheld and has a gimmick that will never see real potential.
Which is exactly what I said in a later reply. A Nintendo system is no longer about the -future- of gaming, it's for a very small niche product that's rarely even put out. This is a shame because at one point, Nintendo was the lead in graphics and would put out 4-5 First Party Main titles per generation.that's not an issue for me as I have an extremely powerful PC, I dont have to settle for anything, The nintendo is for nintendo games and stuff I am not going to see on the PC, that looks like it would be fun to play. all the CoD and AC of the world will eventually show up on the PC, if they dont oh well no biggie.
That's what I mean:I thought they still did? last generation we got Super Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, Legend of Zelda Skyward Sword, Animal Crossing: City Folks, Donky Kong Country Returns, Mario Kart Wii, New Super Mario Brothers Wii, Super Smash Brothers Brawl, two Kirby games, and Metroid Prime 3 off the top of my head.
Zelda/Zelda 2 - NESusually there is only one or two a generation...so I dont get the point. on second thought are you trying to troll? I dont get it? you changed your criteria after the fact from your original statement of "4-5 First Party Main titles per generation."
Don't you mean a second?that didnt answer my question but ok. is your conjecture that they should have developed a third orginal zelda title on the wii?
Yes, I was a bit baffled by the 1 Metroid comment.For the record, there were 4 Metroid games released on the Wii if you count the Wii-ified versions of Prime 1 and 2. Unfortunately one of them was Other M (thanks for nothing, team ninja).
You wouldn't be if you played Other M, hahaha am i riteYes, I was a bit baffled by the 1 Metroid comment.
There was a poll on this forum about how people wipe their asses. I think you're in the clear .I was trying to be polite, I use the portable feature to continue playing while I am on the can.
This is my problem, really. I'm not going to pay 300+ dollars for a system I'm only going to buy 6 games for. Being able to re-acquire old classic games is nice, but I actually still OWN these games. I can just hook up an old system to play them.What I believe Gilg is saying is that before Nintendo was a good system because it was those games and ALSO top hardware and third-party games.
Now it's just those games, and it seems like you have to decide if the latest Nintendo console is worth getting for two Marios, two Zeldas, two Metroids over the course of five or six years.
That would be one of the few reasons I had thought of as to why I might want it. Since you can't, there goes another reason out the window.I just learned you can't play VC games on the pad.
Why the hell not? I thought one of the major features of the WiiU was "free up the television so others can watch TV while you play."I just learned you can't play VC games on the pad.
Not to shit on the Wii-U some more, but
I'd love to hear the Pro-Reasons.Eh, I've already made up my mind to get one after the holidays.
Is there ever any other reason then exclusives if you actually have a good gaming PC?Also do you already own a PS3/360 or gaming PC?
In the long run the Wii paid off for me for most of the same games you listed (though I haven't gotten Xenoblade yet, sadly).Okami and Xenoblade chronicles are the only 2 non-mainstays that I recall playing and having a great time with. So, yeah, I'm fully aware I'm buying the console for the mainstays, but on the Wii, I have Super Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, Metroid Prime 1,2,3(the Wii ports were far superior to the gamecube versions), Twilight Princess, Skyward Sword, the Wii sports titles, any number of Wiiware titles.
So, all in all, it was far from being a waste of money to get one. I assume the WiiU will be the same. ZombiU is already getting rave reviews, and I look forward to new Zelda and Mario (outside the "New Super Mario Brothers" series) games using the new hardware. Actually, because I have a pretty hefty gaming PC, the only reason I have ANY consoles are for the exclusives.
You know you can replace those batteries, right?I have or had every Nintendo console, mostly for the Zelda games. (Ok I didn't own a Virtual Boy, but I did rent it once). I even still have my old brick original Gameboy, but I have no idea if it still works. My Gameboy color does though, but the battery in my copy of Pokemon Yellow is dead so I can't save D: )
Sure if I had the right tools to take it apart, which I do not.You know you can replace those batteries, right?