Bowielee said:
Kissinger, you realize that The Critic was just as much a criticizm of critics themselves as it was of the movies, right?
Jay Sherman thought ALL movies sucked because he could never make it as a film maker himself.
Which makes your avatar a little funny for this subject.
Yeah, I realize that. The Critic was a satire of the movie industry, including critics. However, it was loving satire.
And you'll find that critics don't hate everything, truly love film, are extremely knowledgeable on the subject, and love discussing it and teaching it.
But yeah, my avatar is great. It's pretty appropriate for me, in a cheeky and self-deprecating sort of way.
MindDetective said:
My reason for saying that is that when you are treating the film as an experience, you are no longer examining its parts. You might analyze it on reflection, but that is prone to all the foibles of our memory.
Ah, okay, I see what you're saying. I still don't
entirely agree, but part of the joy of the movie-going experience for me is analyzing a film. I don't really consider myself to be a passive audience member, nor do I think most people are, really. We're constantly thinking about what we're watching - whether it makes sense, trying to understand the characters, processing what each shot is telling us. I think being an active participant in a film contributes to the experience. Although I do get your point about reflection and memory, which is why critics (the good ones, at least) take notes when they watch a movie.