Thank you, this was the response I was looking for. ALSO, check the clip again, and at the :09-11 mark, look at the top left of the screen for a glimpse of Appa!! He'll be directly left of the fireball.Fuck yes.
Fuck yes.
I hope so too. That's my only real concern with this teaser is the metal stuff going on that gives it a 300/watchmen feel to me. The music was really fitting in the series and hopefully they'll keep that feel in the film.*GLEEEE* :clap:
I was worried about this movie but this trailer is making me all hyped up again. It looks great. I hope the music is just as memorable as it was in the original series
I hope so too. That's my only real concern with this teaser is the metal stuff going on that gives it a 300/watchmen feel to me. The music was really fitting in the series and hopefully they'll keep that feel in the film.[/QUOTE]*GLEEEE* :clap:
I was worried about this movie but this trailer is making me all hyped up again. It looks great. I hope the music is just as memorable as it was in the original series
Agreed. Everyone should try this series out.I hate to admit that the trailer looked cool... but it did look cool.
Trailers always do though, so I'll continue to reserve judgment until I see the final product.
Even if it sucks, I'm still comforted by the fact that the three seasons of Avatar: The Last Airbender were all mind-numbingly awesome, and hopefully this movie will convince the people I know to give the series a chance.
You had to be at least a little taken if it convinced you to watch every episode.Eh, looks alright. I'll admit though, I was never all that taken with the show. And yes I watched every freakin' episode. The characters were all annoying, especially Aang and Katara. And Toph. Well pretty much everyone was annoying except for Iroh.
There is no other version. Avatar was made in America. (Well, technically, I guess it was made in Korea.) Avatar is one of those shows where you really have to watch it from the beginning. It goes from being an entertaining show for kids into a fantastic epic story right about halfway through the 1st season. So if you can stick with it, I'd give it a shot. The second season is GOLD, and the third season has....it's moments. What I love the most about this show, was that the creators had a set beginning, middle and end, so it doesn't drag on forever, and you never feel like they've lost their focus.I've seen a couple episodes of the series, granted the American dubb not the original with subs, and I never cared for it. It just seemed like Dragon Ball (not Z) mixed with a little Naruto. I could see the appeal for younger anime fans but as a generation that grew up on Akira, Ghost in the Shell and Appleseed, it never caught a hold on me.
Now THIS movie? Looks fucking sweet. The cgi bending looks perfect for a live action equivalent of the anime. Other than The Happening and Signs, I've liked M Nights movies so this looks promising.
One movie per book, so this is Water. No Toph, Azula, or Dai Li until the next movieOut of curiosity, though... are they going to stuff the whole Avatar story into one movie? Three seasons into one film, that is? Or will this movie be more like, I dunno, a re-imagining of season one?
Because I'd love to see Ba Sing Se, or the library of Wang Shi Tong.
Thank you, this was the response I was looking for. ALSO, check the clip again, and at the :09-11 mark, look at the top left of the screen for a glimpse of Appa!! He'll be directly left of the fireball.[/QUOTE]Fuck yes.
Fuck yes.
You had to be at least a little taken if it convinced you to watch every episode.[/QUOTE]Eh, looks alright. I'll admit though, I was never all that taken with the show. And yes I watched every freakin' episode. The characters were all annoying, especially Aang and Katara. And Toph. Well pretty much everyone was annoying except for Iroh.
It's not an anime. It's an American-made cartoon.I've seen a couple episodes of the series, granted the American dubb not the original with subs, and I never cared for it. It just seemed like Dragon Ball (not Z) mixed with a little Naruto. I could see the appeal for younger anime fans but as a generation that grew up on Akira, Ghost in the Shell and Appleseed, it never caught a hold on me.
Now THIS movie? Looks fucking sweet. The cgi bending looks perfect for a live action equivalent of the anime. Other than The Happening and Signs, I've liked M Nights movies so this looks promising.
I was waiting for someone to respond with that. You don't have to have street smarts to have intuition and the ability to figure something out. Besides it's all of them, not just Aang.Yeah, i mean a guy that was raised in what amounted to a secluded monastery would totally have street smarts...
Of course a film would be more serious, so it's probable that he won't be as exaggerated...
Yeah I liked how they kept the light heartedness going in the heat of battle showing how he would still make some mistakes and wasn't an all serious badass.Mostly I worry that Aang is going to be all serious and kung fu stoic. No, that doesn't contradict the last post I made--light-hearted and fun is okay, but having your protagonist's IQ drop about a thousand points from fight scene to city street scene is annoying.
He means they shouldn't turn Aang into Aangst.So your complaint is that they didn't see stuff you saw a mile away because you're familiar with certain tropes employed in the genre?!
They have already started test screening so it's people from those. It doesn't mean it's going to suck mind you, but the few I have read kind of make it sound like a Street Fighter movie. Hopefully it's not.early reviews? It's not due to be released until july.
He means they shouldn't turn Aang into Aangst.[/QUOTE]So your complaint is that they didn't see stuff you saw a mile away because you're familiar with certain tropes employed in the genre?!
Really fade, it was all mostly in the name of humour, you might argue that it would be too much for a film, but IMO it worked just fine in the cartoon.Where does the intelligence drop that much besides the sense of humor? I know really smart people who have the sense of humor of a three year old. I dont think it seems out of character. Plus they are kids and are not going to get some things no matter how smart they may be with other things.
They have already started test screening so it's people from those. It doesn't mean it's going to suck mind you, but the few I have read kind of make it sound like a Street Fighter movie. Hopefully it's not.[/QUOTE]early reviews? It's not due to be released until july.
They have already started test screening so it's people from those. It doesn't mean it's going to suck mind you, but the few I have read kind of make it sound like a Street Fighter movie. Hopefully it's not.[/QUOTE]early reviews? It's not due to be released until july.
*cough*Stick up the ass.*cough**cough*Racebending*cough*
Pretty sure Suki is going to be a big player in it, as she has her own wallpaper on their official site: http://www.thelastairbendermovie.com/#downloadsAwwww yeah Battle for the North Pole.
Although I despair for characters such as Jeong-Jeong, Suki, and Jet. But we'll see, I suppose. Personally I don't think the movie will live up to the series by a long shot, but I do think it will be quite entertaining.
Yes and no. I really enjoyed the arc that Jet got, as well as the two characters that were with him in the second season, but while he served his purpose in the series (in the grand scheme of things), I really can't see them devoting time to him in a 2 hour movie. Maybe they'll surprise me though, and set him and his "Gang" up for the trilogy.Am I the only one who thinks Jet and his 'merry kids' were annoying as hell? Well, except for Pipsqueek and the Duke, that is. The rest I could not give a lemur's crap about.
To be fair, he didn't look like one at the end of the series ether.Awww dammit. Iroh doesn't look like a jovial fat guy
I'm pretty sure the voice at the end is Gran Gran. Her characters already been cast, while Aunt Wu has not.Allright getting released just in time for my birthday!
I'm guessing the voice at the end of the video is going to be Aunt Wu (the fortuneteller). I'd love for cabbageman to be in there too. definitely the best inconsequential side character. As for uncle, I agree he doesnt have that look like he will be making jokes all the time but I think he can still be a great character without that quirky humor about him.
As i said last time, it's not like they really looked of different ethnicities in the cartoon either, they just had different skin shading on the same basic model (for the main characters).I still don't get what people were complaining about...those kids look identical to their cartoon counterparts. It's almost uncanny.
Yeah, I like how they disconnected the back tattoo from the arms so it looks like a cross. I hope we get more of that Christ metaphor crap from Shyamlan, like in Lady in the Water. We've seen the director, King Kong, and Superman as Christ and one of the big flaws in the series was that Aang's personal sacrifices never felt like Christ, so this will be deep and all that shit.Aside from Zuko's burn-scar looking more like a minor black eye, that looked pretty decent. I like Aang's tattoos, I thought those were nicely done.
As i said last time, it's not like they really looked of different ethnicities in the cartoon either, they just had different skin shading on the same basic model (for the main characters).[/QUOTE]I still don't get what people were complaining about...those kids look identical to their cartoon counterparts. It's almost uncanny.
This would make sense, except only the North and South Air Temples seem to be in cold places. The Western Air Temple is suspended on the underside of a canyon's cliff face like some sort of Aztlan work in South/Central America, which means it's likely below sea level. We never really get to see the location of the Eastern one, but considering fruit (or whatever the hell an Onion-Banana is) grows there, it's likely to be below the tree line as well. In fact, considering all Airbenders are vegetarians for religious reasons, wouldn't all the temples need to be in a relatively warm/temperate climate to grow their food? I suppose they could just have fields around the base of their mountains or something, but it's doubtful they traded for most of their food when they likely didn't have a primary export.@Li3n said:But you know, it makes sense for a people that lived on cold mountain tops to be lightly coloured, even if they have asian features (as do most of the background characters).
This is one of my worries of the movie: All the trailers seem to depict Aang as some kind of somber savior figure, when he's almost never depicted as such in the show unless he's had some kind of serious tragedy happen. It's really core to his character that he acts like a kid 90% of the time and I'm really worried that they will try to turn him in a messiah from the get-go instead of becoming one over the course of the story.I hope he gets to show that he is still just a 10 year old boy that likes to play as much as fight. I always felt that that was such a redeeming value of the show. Here you have the savior of the kingdoms with the weight of the world on his shoulders... riding a ball of air and giggling like the innocent 10 year old that he is.
And in the film they're also supposed to represent various ethnicities, just played by white actors... the point being that the show also did something like that, kinda like Black Barbie being a normal Barbie painted brown.And let's not get this started again. Ether you believe everyone in the damn show is supposed to be based on various ethnic minorities and no one is white on it, or you somehow believe the main cast is white (and no one else) despite the setting. Believe what you want.
You do realise that most of Europe in in a temperate climate, right?This would make sense, except only the North and South Air Temples seem to be in cold places. The Western Air Temple is suspended on the underside of a canyon's cliff face like some sort of Aztlan work in South/Central America, which means it's likely below sea level. We never really get to see the location of the Eastern one, but considering fruit (or whatever the hell an Onion-Banana is) grows there, it's likely to be below the tree line as well. In fact, considering all Airbenders are vegetarians for religious reasons, wouldn't all the temples need to be in a relatively warm/temperate climate to grow their food? I suppose they could just have fields around the base of their mountains or something, but it's doubtful they traded for most of their food when they likely didn't have a primary export.
I don't think that's a fair statement at all. First of all, the show is a stylized cartoon and the kids don't look any more white than they do asian or black. The other thing is that there actually IS a fair variety in facial features of the various adults (and consistency as to where they're from). The Earth Kingdom people tend to look (slightly) more chinese, for example. You wouldn't necessarily notice if the Earth Kingdom wasn't obviously supposed to be reminiscent of China, but it's there.And in the film they're also supposed to represent various ethnicities, just played by white actors... the point being that the show also did something like that, kinda like Black Barbie being a normal Barbie painted brown.
I don't think that's a fair statement at all. First of all, the show is a stylized cartoon and the kids don't look any more white than they do asian or black. The other thing is that there actually IS a fair variety in facial features of the various adults (and consistency as to where they're from). The Earth Kingdom people tend to look (slightly) more chinese, for example. You wouldn't necessarily notice if the Earth Kingdom wasn't obviously supposed to be reminiscent of China, but it's there.And in the film they're also supposed to represent various ethnicities, just played by white actors... the point being that the show also did something like that, kinda like Black Barbie being a normal Barbie painted brown.
Yeah, they need to be more tanned to look close enough, i agree...Someone earlier said all the actors were "uncannily similar" and I really have no idea what they're talking about. Sokka has the Sokka haircut, which is good, but apart from that they don't look like the originals any more than I'd expect any generic white actor(res) to look like them.
That someone was me, and I still stand by it. It's more than the haircut. He has the same jawline, the same somewhat unusually broad mouth, and same eyes turned down at the corners, for example.Until I saw the newest trailer I was upset about the whitewashing in a distant, intellectual way, but this is the first time I'm found myself viscerally reacting, in particular to Katara and Sokka. Someone earlier said all the actors were "uncannily similar" and I really have no idea what they're talking about. Sokka has the Sokka haircut, which is good, but apart from that they don't look like the originals any more than I'd expect any generic white actor(res) to look like them.
And i guess they're doing the same for the film, after all, kids identify with white people better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_and_Mamie_Clark#Doll_experimentsThe difference between Barbie and the Avatar cartoon is that Barbie's features are very distinctly white (well, Barbie's anatomy has all kinds of interesting things going on but let's not go there), whereas in Avatar the kids' features are abstracted to the point where they're not clearly any particular ethnicity.
There's a section in the book \"understanding comics\" about the power of the cartoon - when you see any random photo, it probably won't look like you at all. The more cartoony it looks, however, the more people can identify with it. A lot of times in games or movies you'll have fairly detailed environments, but a simplified hero that people can project themselves onto. I think that's part of what's going on with the Avatar kids.
The rape of Smurfette. In this way the male lead character will be able to grow as a person.I loved the show. Is this going to be like the show?
Nope. Pretty damn obvious. It's what happens when you take a somewhat light hearted and humorous adventure and turn it into Lord of the Rings. Can't wait for the Smurfs movie. It's probably going to open with a murder.
Muhahahahaha:Can't wait for the Smurfs movie. It's probably going to open with a murder.
Actually i recall a study where lighter skin was preferred by men regardless of social influences and that even historically it was preferred in isolated societies with no contact to white people. My google fu fails me though.Well that's the flipside of the argument. The point isn't that kids identify with white people because people are inherently more identifiable - the point is we put white people all over the bloody place to the point that people strongly connect white == good guys.
You want something truly horrific? Try this ear-bleeder for change:
Zuko Alone might be pretty good for that. Good mixture of continuity and stand-aloneness.I tried to get my roomate to watch it with me when it first came out, but he'd sit down for a few minutes then say it wasn't for him. It wasn't until the Dai Li came along in the second season that he got really into it, then he had me go back and show him the whole series. I've heard other people mention starting with the "Siege of the North" from the first season to get them hooked. Maybe you could cherry pick some episodes to show them, then make them sit through the first episodes.
Those are indeed awesome episodes.My favourite episodes are pretty action-packed and also continuity important. Try showing people The Waterbending Master (Pakku vs. Katara) or the Blind Bandit (which is both funny AND awesome).
I was "meh" on the series at first. Watched a few episodes at a friend's house, thought it was cool, but nothing I really cared about.I tried to get my roomate to watch it with me when it first came out, but he'd sit down for a few minutes then say it wasn't for him. It wasn't until the Dai Li came along in the second season that he got really into it, then he had me go back and show him the whole series. I've heard other people mention starting with the "Siege of the North" from the first season to get them hooked. Maybe you could cherry pick some episodes to show them, then make them sit through the first episodes.
I'm hoping that they split Season 2 into two movies. The 1st part introducing Toph and Azula, climaxing with the Library/Desert/Appa kidnapping thing. The 2nd part dealing with the Dai Li, Zuko's struggle, and ending with the fall of the Earth Kingdom.Fair enough but (in my mind at least) there's not a lot of dead weight that can be cut off Book 2.
That would be a way to match up scenes, but would be somewhat divided continuity-wise.It would be interesting to see if someone edits down the original shows on their own, and then compares it to the movie.
But I actually thought Watchmen was pretty good (saw the movie first),
Mm.Bubastus is the only thing that stuck out when I saw it the first time,
What, it's bad that I liked Watchmen just fine?Nevermind. I'm just gonna stop this now.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Bubastus was the only thing that struck me as \\"inserted for the benefit of fanboys as opposed to for the general moviegoing audience.\\" I thought the rest flowed fairly well, and I think my position as someone who saw the movie first suggests that that wasn't just me carrying over my preference for the book version.
I'm pretty sure that's the other way around... the Cold War being why y'all took all the credit. (did you know that Churchill wanted to attack Russia right after they won?)The reason my dad was unimpressed, I think, had a lot to do with all the philosophy in the book being fairly old hat to him. (For example, at the time, the notion that we basically took credit for all of Russia's work during WWII and that contributed to the Cold War, might have been interesting, but by now that's already been his opinion for 20+ years.)
And by the time they got that they probably would have already launched. Attacking with a psychic attack + squid thing in just one city = no assumption it was a bomb...I think part of the thing with the ending was that they destroyed cities on both sides of the Cold War, so that it was clearly not purely a US move.
That's why Ozy is needed alive... that was all part of the plan.The other thing is that for it to actually work, you'd need to somehow leave the world with an actual threat from Manhattan that would carry over for more than a few years. If Doc attacks once and then leaves, how long are people actually going to be scared (same applies to giant squid).
Why? there's no drama here. People have different opinions. I think everyone understands that some of the meaning, possibly a lot, was stripped from the movie. But that doesn't make it bad in and of itself. That's true of any adaptation.Man, am I glad I'm not taking part in this shit again. It looks almost as fun as it did a year ago.
Way to miss the point... the idea was that they where all already scared of him, now they should all be frickin' running for the hills, not partnering up, because hey know they can't stop him. The only thing keeping the US from attacking the USSR was that Manhattan said he couldn't get all their nukes in time...I do disagree with @Li3n still. I don't care if Dr. Manhattan had kept the USSR in check before--when he starts blowing up cities, it's a different thing entirely.
I saw a dragon, which is probablyWas that...
Was that a dragon? Or was it just a really obscured Koh?
The Last Airbender in 3Deeeee, also in 2Deeeeee, rated PGeeeeee."AlsoIn2D!"
Silly advertisements.
Yeah the actor playing Sokka seems like annoying crap.The short clips I'm seeing of the kid playing Sokka make me really worry about this movie.
Yeah the actor playing Sokka seems like annoying crap.[/QUOTE]The short clips I'm seeing of the kid playing Sokka make me really worry about this movie.
Yeah the actor playing Sokka seems like annoying crap.[/QUOTE]The short clips I'm seeing of the kid playing Sokka make me really worry about this movie.
The Last Airbender
BY ROGER EBERT / June 30, 2010
cast & credits
Aang Noah Ringer
Prince Zuko Dev Patel
Katara Nicola Peltz
Sokka Jackson Rathbone
Uncle Iroh Shaun Toub
Commander Zhao Aasif Mandvi
Fire Lord Ozai Cliff Curtis
Princess Yue Seychelle Gabriel
Paramount presents a film directed by M. Night Shyamalan. Screenplay by Running time: 103 minutes. MPAA rating: PG (for fantasy action violence).
Printer-friendly »
E-mail this to a friend »
"The Last Airbender" is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that.
Let's start with the 3D, which was added as an afterthought to a 2D movie. Not only is it unexploited and unnecessary, but it's a disaster even if you like 3D. M. Night Shyamalan's retrofit produces the drabbest, darkest, dingiest movie of any sort I've seen in years. You know something is wrong when the screen is filled with flames that have the vibrancy of faded Polaroids. It's a known fact that 3D causes a measurable decrease in perceived brightness, but "Airbender" looks like it was filmed with a dirty sheet over the lens.
Now for the movie itself. The first fatal decision was to make a live-action film out of material that was born to be anime. The animation of the Nickelodeon TV series drew on the bright colors and "clear line" style of such masters as Miyazaki, and was a pleasure to observe. It's in the very nature of animation to make absurd visual sights more plausible.
Since "Airbender" involves the human manipulation of the forces of air, earth, water and fire, there is hardly an event that can be rendered plausibly in live action. That said, its special effects are atrocious. The first time the waterbender Katara summons a globe of water, which then splashes (offscreen) on her brother Sokka, he doesn't even get wet. Firebenders' flames don't seem to really burn, and so on.
The story takes place in the future, after Man has devastated the planet and survives in the form of beings with magical powers allowing them to influence earth, water and fire. These warring factions are held in uneasy harmony by the Avatar, but the Avatar has disappeared, and Earth lives in a state of constant turmoil caused by the warlike Firebenders.
Our teenage heroes Katara and Sokka discover a child frozen in the ice. This is Aang (Noah Ringer), and they come to suspect he may be the Avatar, or Last Airbender. Perhaps he can bring harmony and quell the violent Firebenders. This plot is incomprehensible, apart from the helpful orientation that we like Katara, Sokka and Aang and are therefore against their enemies.
The dialogue is couched in unspeakable quasi-medieval formalities; the characters are so portentous they seem to have been trained for grade school historical pageants. Their dialogue is functional and action-driven. There is little conviction that any of this might be real even in their minds. All of the benders in the movie appear only in terms of their attributes and functions, and contain no personality.
Potentially interesting details are botched. Consider the great iron ships of the Firebenders. These show potential as Steampunk, but are never caressed for their intricacies. Consider the detail Miyazaki lavished on Howl's Moving Castle. Trying sampling a Nickelodeon clip from the original show to glimpse the look that might have been.
After the miscalculation of making the movie as live action, there remained the challenge of casting it. Shyamalan has failed. His first inexplicable mistake was to change the races of the leading characters; on television Aang was clearly Asian, and so were Katara and Sokka, with perhaps Mongolian and Inuit genes. Here they're all whites. This casting makes no sense because (1) It's a distraction for fans of the hugely popular TV series, and (2) all three actors are pretty bad. I don't say they're untalented, I say they've been poorly served by Shyamalan and the script. They are bland, stiff, awkward and unconvincing. Little Aang reminds me of Wallace Shawn as a child. This is not a bad thing (he should only grow into Shawn's shoes), but doesn't the role require little Andre, not little Wally?
As the villain, Shyamalan has cast Cliff Curtis as Fire Lord Ozai and Dev Patel (the hero of "Slumdog Millionaire") as his son Prince Zuko. This is all wrong. In material at this melodramatic level, you need teeth-gnashers, not leading men. Indeed, all of the acting seems inexplicably muted. I've been an admirer of many of Shyamalan's films, but action and liveliness are not his strong points. I fear he takes the theology of the Bending universe seriously.
As "The Last Airbender" bores and alienates its audiences, consider the opportunities missed here. (1) This material should have become an A-list animated film. (2) It was a blunder jumping aboard the 3D bandwagon with phony 3D retro-fitted to a 2D film. (3) If it had to be live action, better special effects artists should have been found. It's not as if films like "2012" and "Knowing" didn't contain "real life" illusions as spectacular as anything called for in "The Last Airbender."
I close with the hope that the title proves prophetic.
I was about to dismiss him as the grumpy old man that he is, but after reading it he's probably right. He even praises the animated series at several points.Ebert hated it.
Let’s just be honest: M. Night Shyamalan is an idiot
Probably because the entire art style was based on Eastern influences like Miyazaki and Osamu Tezuka? Honestly, it's probably a better indicator to judge animation by it's style than it's country of origin, as it's less confusing. Hell, Japan has cartoon series like Stitch! (Lilo & Stitch, set in Okinawa instead of Hawaii) and Transformers Animated that were made in Japan, but based on Western styles. Calling THEM Cartoons makes more sense than call them Anime, even if they are made in Japan. Even Europe has shows that are based on eastern stylings (namely Code Lyoko and Ōban Star-Racers) that have been widely distributed and localized. Would you call them Anime, despite being concieved and developed in Europe? Or would you call them Cartoons, despite being based on Japanese animation traditions?and why do people insist on calling this anime?
It is as anime as Scooby-Do.
Were you a fan of the show? I'm curious as to how much bad characterization is them expecting the audience to know the characters.Just saw it with my friend. I am actually amazed at how awful it is for such a big budget movie.
I am seriously thinking about buying this on DVD just so I can use it as a reference for all the possible pitfalls a person can make when writing a movie. It failed in ways I didn't even realize were possible.
For example: Remember at the end of Unbreakable, when the big twist is followed by a idiotic text explanation of what happened next, creating an odd pacing that makes you feel a bit ill at ease? Well, the pacing for this movie will make you feel that way for the entire film. Plus, there's a grand total of zero time spent getting to know the characters, the movie's theme seems to change every ten minutes, the direction didn't even try to take advantage of the 3D, And the fight scenes were often filled with soldiers standing around making odd postures with their weapons and not showing any concern about actually attacking.
Everything felt so... off. So forced. So Arbitrary. So Nonsensical. Usually the kind of money that goes into a movie like is kept away from incompetence of the magnitude found here.
Shyamalan's career is dead. He won't get another chance after this.
Were you a fan of the show? I'm curious as to how much bad characterization is them expecting the audience to know the characters.[/QUOTE]Just saw it with my friend. I am actually amazed at how awful it is for such a big budget movie.
I am seriously thinking about buying this on DVD just so I can use it as a reference for all the possible pitfalls a person can make when writing a movie. It failed in ways I didn't even realize were possible.
For example: Remember at the end of Unbreakable, when the big twist is followed by a idiotic text explanation of what happened next, creating an odd pacing that makes you feel a bit ill at ease? Well, the pacing for this movie will make you feel that way for the entire film. Plus, there's a grand total of zero time spent getting to know the characters, the movie's theme seems to change every ten minutes, the direction didn't even try to take advantage of the 3D, And the fight scenes were often filled with soldiers standing around making odd postures with their weapons and not showing any concern about actually attacking.
Everything felt so... off. So forced. So Arbitrary. So Nonsensical. Usually the kind of money that goes into a movie like is kept away from incompetence of the magnitude found here.
Shyamalan's career is dead. He won't get another chance after this.
helpful hint: the "vibe" about a movie comes from film criticshmmm, I don't put much stock in film reviews as a rule. If I want to see something, I'll see it. But my desire to see a film can be affected by the general vibe surrounding it.
helpful hint: the "vibe" about a movie comes from film critics[/QUOTE]hmmm, I don't put much stock in film reviews as a rule. If I want to see something, I'll see it. But my desire to see a film can be affected by the general vibe surrounding it.
Gamer was a fun movie, wasn't a great movie by any stretch but it had the redeeming quality of having Milo Ventimiglia's character getting foricbly bent over Gerard Butler's knee. I don't care what the character's name was in the movie it was acceptible because Peter Petrelli got owned in that movie.Not having seen much of the show, beyond a couple of episodes, I can safely say that from a non-Avatar fan's point of view that it was a huge, unadulterated sack of liquefied AIDS virus'.
One of the worst God damn movies I have ever seen and deserving of every negative review it got. A friend of mine, however, who is also not a fan thought it was pleasant enough. She also has the worst fucking taste in movies in the history of the world actually making such claims as, "Gamer wasn't a bad movie, it had really unique and terrific cinematography." so take that shit with a grain of shit.
Considering that Avatar is very loved by many people and it is being lumped with movies like Eragon and The Phantom Menace (neither of which were amazingly bad) makes me think that it will be ok.
Gamer was a fun movie, wasn't a great movie by any stretch but it had the redeeming quality of having Milo Ventimiglia's character getting foricbly bent over Gerard Butler's knee. I don't care what the character's name was in the movie it was acceptible because Peter Petrelli got owned in that movie. [/QUOTE]Not having seen much of the show, beyond a couple of episodes, I can safely say that from a non-Avatar fan's point of view that it was a huge, unadulterated sack of liquefied AIDS virus'.
One of the worst God damn movies I have ever seen and deserving of every negative review it got. A friend of mine, however, who is also not a fan thought it was pleasant enough. She also has the worst fucking taste in movies in the history of the world actually making such claims as, "Gamer wasn't a bad movie, it had really unique and terrific cinematography." so take that shit with a grain of shit.
helpful hint: the "vibe" about a movie comes from film critics[/QUOTE]Not necessarily, the "vibe" can come from a place like this as well. Unless you're saying that everyone's opinion here is based solely on what is written by film critics, which I kind of doubt.hmmm, I don't put much stock in film reviews as a rule. If I want to see something, I'll see it. But my desire to see a film can be affected by the general vibe surrounding it.
That's probably not unfair, although I think the action/martial arts director/coordinator probably has as much to do with that as anything. But now that you bring that up, I did notice a number of scenes where the camera was really tight on the actors' faces, so that may well be M. Night's "comfort zone", so to speak.Sol's review makes it sound like M Night just had no idea what to do with this, as in, it was direction out of his depth. He's not used to having lots of people in the background, for example, so he didn't think of making the idea of a big battle convincing much of an issue.
I have to say I didn't really see this at all. I thought that they utilized the elements themselves well enough.And everything I read makes it sound like they turned everyone's powers into just different colored energy, as opposed to treating them like actual elements with creative uses. It's just Dragonball Z at that point.
Well, let's take the example of the fight between Zuko and Katara around the holy... pond... thing.I have to say I didn't really see this at all. I thought that they utilized the elements themselves well enough.And everything I read makes it sound like they turned everyone's powers into just different colored energy, as opposed to treating them like actual elements with creative uses. It's just Dragonball Z at that point.
No, it has nothing to do with a post-apocalyptic future. Though the film does such a bad job explaining itself, it doesn't surprise me that someone thinks that.fire benders can't just make their own fire? That's such a large part of their strength, I thought.
And is it really set in some distant post apocalyptic future on earth? When Ebert said that in his review I figured he just assumed that and wasn't familiar with the show that much.
I get the feeling that fans of the show will be more willing to overlook the film's thousand-and-one flaws, since as far as I can tell from what little I know, the story stays true to the series.
But if you don't already know exactly what's going on, you're going to hate it. To death.
---------- Post added at 08:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------
So while she's trying to move enough water up to his location to his location to make sure she extinguishes all the flames, Zuko is supposed to be sporting or something and not try and burn her face off? Zuko had the drop on her and the high ground (make your own Obi-wan/Annakin reference here...) so it was pretty much all she could do to defend herself and Aang.Well, let's take the example of the fight between Zuko and Katara around the holy... pond... thing.I have to say I didn't really see this at all. I thought that they utilized the elements themselves well enough.And everything I read makes it sound like they turned everyone's powers into just different colored energy, as opposed to treating them like actual elements with creative uses. It's just Dragonball Z at that point.
Since Shyamalan decided to make it so the firebenders need a source of flame to be able to use their powers, Zuko sets fire to some of the grass around the pond.
Man... if only there were some sort of thing in the pond that could be used to extinguish these fires. Some sort of... wet thing that Katara could somehow control and try to put the fire out.
But since no such, wet, extinguishing thing exists as far as I know, Katara just uses the pond's water to try to blast Zuko, and to defend herself from Zuko's fire blasts.
In the film it seems that only the really powerful fire-benders can generate their own fire.fire benders can't just make their own fire? That's such a large part of their strength, I thought.
There's no suggestion or hint of that being the case. I suspect that's a case of Ebert having a bit too vivid imagination of his own.And is it really set in some distant post apocalyptic future on earth? When Ebert said that in his review I figured he just assumed that and wasn't familiar with the show that much.
So while she's trying to move enough water up to his location to his location to make sure she extinguishes all the flames, Zuko is supposed to be sporting or something and not try and burn her face off? Zuko had the drop on her and the high ground (make your own Obi-wan/Annakin reference here...) so it was pretty much all she could do to defend herself and Aang.[/COLOR]Well, let's take the example of the fight between Zuko and Katara around the holy... pond... thing.I have to say I didn't really see this at all. I thought that they utilized the elements themselves well enough.And everything I read makes it sound like they turned everyone's powers into just different colored energy, as opposed to treating them like actual elements with creative uses. It's just Dragonball Z at that point.
Since Shyamalan decided to make it so the firebenders need a source of flame to be able to use their powers, Zuko sets fire to some of the grass around the pond.
Man... if only there were some sort of thing in the pond that could be used to extinguish these fires. Some sort of... wet thing that Katara could somehow control and try to put the fire out.
But since no such, wet, extinguishing thing exists as far as I know, Katara just uses the pond's water to try to blast Zuko, and to defend herself from Zuko's fire blasts.
Three years until the comet?OH GOD IT WAS SO BAD
Actually at the very end it is mentioned that when Sozin's Comet returns in three years, it will give ALL firebenders the ability to bend their own fire. The only person who did it in the movie was Iroh.
Three years until the comet?OH GOD IT WAS SO BAD
Actually at the very end it is mentioned that when Sozin's Comet returns in three years, it will give ALL firebenders the ability to bend their own fire. The only person who did it in the movie was Iroh.
Technically the movie is actually using the proper pronunciations of these asian-inspired names. The TV series actually 'americanizes' the pronunciation.Also, in the movie, just about everyone's name is mispronounced. Why? They have PLENTY of source material to work from!
That's just for the opening day. Estimated figures for the weekend box office won't be available until late Sunday with final figures appearing on Monday.
So you're saying she should have done something that wouldn't have succeeded rather than something that would work? Zuko had the advantage on her and he had the sense to set fire to the grass so he would have had more than one source of flame. So he basically took into account that strategy and countered it.Well, I guess what I'm getting at is that the fighting strategies never seem to take advantage of the elements' specific properties, save for about... twice that I can think of.
I mean, yeah, Katara probably wouldn't have succeeded, but she could have at least tried something other than the same blast/defend with a wall strategy everyone uses in every fight throughout the entire movie.
Fail.
Fail.
Technically the movie is actually using the proper pronunciations of these asian-inspired names. The TV series actually 'americanizes' the pronunciation.[/QUOTE]Also, in the movie, just about everyone's name is mispronounced. Why? They have PLENTY of source material to work from!
I think you misunderstand. I'm pretty sure what he means is that the kids are going to age, regardless. If they said it was coming in three months and it takes 3-4 years to make all 3 movies, the kids are not going to be kids anymore. Fuck, Sokka is already barely a "kid".But in Harry Potter, we see the course of a year take place within the film, and all we miss is the summer break.
So spacing it out like that really makes no sense for Airbender. Not to mention, they did it by a few months in the show, and that took place across three years.
And I have to wonder if this is even going to get a sequel. I have a feeling that its own terribleness and the release of Eclipse will have crushed it for this weekend.
I think you misunderstand. I'm pretty sure what he means is that the kids are going to age, regardless. If they said it was coming in three months and it takes 3-4 years to make all 3 movies, the kids are not going to be kids anymore. Fuck, Sokka is already barely a "kid".[/QUOTE]But in Harry Potter, we see the course of a year take place within the film, and all we miss is the summer break.
So spacing it out like that really makes no sense for Airbender. Not to mention, they did it by a few months in the show, and that took place across three years.
And I have to wonder if this is even going to get a sequel. I have a feeling that its own terribleness and the release of Eclipse will have crushed it for this weekend.
Technically the movie is actually using the proper pronunciations of these asian-inspired names. The TV series actually 'americanizes' the pronunciation.[/QUOTE]Also, in the movie, just about everyone's name is mispronounced. Why? They have PLENTY of source material to work from!
Technically the movie is actually using the proper pronunciations of these asian-inspired names. The TV series actually 'americanizes' the pronunciation.[/QUOTE]Also, in the movie, just about everyone's name is mispronounced. Why? They have PLENTY of source material to work from!
Look I'm not a fan of the 'white-washing' either, but I think that's a bit much to say they 'hate the chinese'. (and why just the Chinese? what about the rest of Asia?) I don't think the changes were made out of malice, but cowardice. The reality is that when you spend $150 million on something, you tend to want to take the 'safe' route.First the ethnic change was a bad call from day one. I don't like it. They should have kept the Asian in it. Heck, even the elements writing was changes... blah. Maybe they hate Chinese. I don't know
Well, it is more "Asian" style. Sorry you found it so distracting, but as far as changes go this has far more legitimacy than some others.Name change - If the movie is going to be base on the show, they should have kept the SAME pronunciation. some may argue it is more "Asian" style, but I find it VERY distracting.
Well the main trio weren't particularly good, but I don't think Zuko and Iroh were that bad. Asif Mandvi did chew the scenery a bit as Zhou, but otherwise was pretty good.Line deliverance of each character was pretty poor. Katara's role was poorly done. Sokka suppose to be funny AND a great tactician but noooo.... his character changed.
Yep, even recognizing that cuts were obviously necessary, that sequence was bit odd.Haru's name was never mention and what is with actually putting "powerful" earth bender in an earth prison??? what is up with that? in the Anime, the prisoner are put into metal ocean rigs since they can't bend metal (which will cover later in the anime that only a few earth masters CAN bend metal) so they are really prisoner and can't escape, but in the movie, it would have been pretty easy to keep all those earth bender in one place with plenty of ammo. It is like putting a soldiers in an open weapon bunker and tell them to behave... yea right.
I empathize with you wearing glasses. The 3D in this movie was indeed worthless, it was tacked on in the post-production. The problem is that the film was not shot with 3D in mind, so there were precious few shots that could take advantage of the extra depth, and even those didn't come off very well. On top of that the process made the film darker and 'muddier'. I've heard they had similar problems with "Clash of the Titans".3D was a total waste. I rather watch a quality film than having it 3D. I wear glasses and having a 3D glasses on TOP of my glasses is not very comfortable. I wouldn't wear it at home cause it hinders me. Once the tech can actually produce 3D without glasses then we'll talk.
Particularly in this case when it doesn't really add anything and it has a negative effect on the picture quality. They really need to be more careful about this as bad 3D in films has the potential to kill the technology before it can take hold.Oh I have to agree that Avatar 3D was very good. I was pretty surprise it blends well. Not all 3D is good, but this one "The last airbender" could have done without.
I don't think that's necessarily unfair, however I do think that there's a much simpler explanation for it: I think that the producers assumed that if the average american film-goer saw movie posters and/or previews for this film and saw an all-asian cast that their first thought would be: "huh, must be a foreign film." and that their second thought would be "meh, I do care for foreign films, what else is playing?" I think it was fear of that kind of reaction that lead them to go the 'safe route', which is really a shame.for those who haven't watch avatar
I know the story line is also white washed i.e. the white guy has the save the day, and pretty much combine the story of "Fern Gully" "Pocahontas" and "Dances with wolves" but the delivery was quite good and the story was interesting
I thought the Indian/South Asian characters with Japanese-esque armor was a good fit. I wish they had carried through that theme in the casting of Iroh, as it was kind of weird having Zuko's Uncle and Ozai's brother be a white guy. Although technically the actor who played Ozai is Maori, not Indian. So I guess that just fits in with the whole weird mix of races theme.well... I feel that the fire nation has taken the most in Chinese/Japanese route in the anime. Indian (India Indian are technically Asian that is why I mention Chinese) was a bit weird, but you are right the actors who did Zuko and Iroh was pretty good and not bad (the dread locks was weird but hey I guess dread locks are natural to the Indian nation right? (again India not American Indian))
Yes. This. Which is called whitewashing. It's also worth noting that Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon did just fine. Also, that as recently as "Hitch," Hollywood producers were afraid to cast Will Smith as a lead by himself without a white man to accompany him because he "wasn't bankable enough." Hitch also did just fine. Hollywood likes to hide behind the fact that "it's the public that's racist, not us, we just have to follow the money," when the fact is the public is far less racist that Hollywood gives them credit for.I think that the producers assumed that if the average american film-goer saw movie posters and/or previews for this film and saw an all-asian cast that their first thought would be: "huh, must be a foreign film." and that their second thought would be "meh, I do care for foreign films, what else is playing?" I think it was fear of that kind of reaction that lead them to go the 'safe route', which is really a shame.
That is what I believe. Sure maybe about 20 years ago the "population could be racist" but with the internet age and people can watch anything from anywhere in the globe, not so much.Yes. This. Which is called whitewashing. It's also worth noting that Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon did just fine. Also, that as recently as "Hitch," Hollywood producers were afraid to cast Will Smith as a lead by himself without a white man to accompany him because he "wasn't bankable enough." Hitch also did just fine. Hollywood likes to hide behind the fact that "it's the public that's racist, not us, we just have to follow the money," when the fact is the public is far less racist that Hollywood gives them credit for.I think that the producers assumed that if the average american film-goer saw movie posters and/or previews for this film and saw an all-asian cast that their first thought would be: "huh, must be a foreign film." and that their second thought would be "meh, I do care for foreign films, what else is playing?" I think it was fear of that kind of reaction that lead them to go the 'safe route', which is really a shame.
According to wikipedia, CTHD made $128million in the U.S., which is indeed a very impressive figure for a film that cost $17million to make. Unfortunately that would not be as good a result for a film that cost $150million to make. The general calculus as I understand it is that a film generally has to make it's production costs back in the U.S., then the foreign grosses are where they make their profit. Of course that calculus has changed somewhat with the rise of DVD sales in the 90's, but the core of it is still there.Yes. This. Which is called whitewashing. It's also worth noting that Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon did just fine. Also, that as recently as "Hitch," Hollywood producers were afraid to cast Will Smith as a lead by himself without a white man to accompany him because he "wasn't bankable enough." Hitch also did just fine. Hollywood likes to hide behind the fact that "it's the public that's racist, not us, we just have to follow the money," when the fact is the public is far less racist that Hollywood gives them credit for.
To be fair I do think that there are parts of this country that are '20 years behind the times'. I'd like to believe that this country is a post-racist society, but it's not.I think Hollywood fairly consistently lives about 20 years behind the times in terms of "playing it safe." The Kirk/Uhura kiss was super controversial and the producers wanted them to record two separate scenes (one in which they did kiss, one without). The actors deliberately kept messing up the "kiss-less" scene so they just showed the kiss scene everywhere. And then got loads of positive fan mail. (Plus one cranky guy from Alabama).
Unless the Chinese ban it, for offending their cultural heritage or some such. (Wouldn't be the first time...)It's going to do well overseas because it's a big event spectacle flick with special effects.
Unless the Chinese ban it, for offending their cultural heritage or some such. (Wouldn't be the first time...)[/QUOTE]It's going to do well overseas because it's a big event spectacle flick with special effects.
It's especially damning, as every season except the first had a mid-season cliff hanger as well.It is a bit sad that this movie basically failed. I blame the studio as much as Shyamalan. They a property that could have easily been turned into 6 feature films. That is supposed to be the new Holy Grail for the studios. Instead they compress this down, and rush it through production. And made a lousy movie out of a good little story.
If you click on the "Forgeign" tab on that page you'll see that the film hasn't been released in the majority of the countries they have listed. That suggests it's foreign box office isn't done yet.So after four weeks, The Last Airbender has barely made its money back worldwide.
I'm guessing this means that Shyamalan isn't as dead as I predicted, but there won't be a sequel.
"utterly and irredeemably awful"? Seriously? The film was definitely flawed, but "utterly and irredeemably awful"? Not even close.It'll probably make back money, but M. Night's credibility as a director has been all but destroyed... which is good, as it means he likely won't be involved in the inevitable sequel, which actually gives it hope of not being utterly and irredeemably awful.
It is pretty awful. I would rather watch Harry Potter or X-Men again than watch Last Airbender the movie. It was that bad for me.No... it was utterly and irredeemably awful. I'm pretty sure you stand alone in thinking otherwise.
(well, not literally alone, but people who didn't hate the movie are pretty scarce.)
Well, not that scarce apparently considering it's box office take which was pretty ok. Not great or fantastic, of course, but then that is fair since it wasn't a great or fantastic film. Now among voices on the internets, there is indeed a lot of hate towards this film. The thing is that internets have a tendency to go to extremes. Everything is either the greatest ever or the worst ever. So what really makes me alone is that fact that I'm arguing for the film's "ok-ness".No... it was utterly and irredeemably awful. I'm pretty sure you stand alone in thinking otherwise.
(well, not literally alone, but people who didn't hate the movie are pretty scarce.)
Oh no... it's not the worst movie ever. That honor currently goes to Tommy Wiseau's The Room, ever since Tommy Wiseau made the Nostalgia Critic take down his review of it, despite it being perfectly legal for him to show images of said movie during a review.I suppose I could just say that it was the worst movie ever made just to fit in, but I just don't honestly believe that.