a bigger hole would make it worse?
Maybe I misunderstood your suggestion, but think about this for a moment –*volcanoes erupt when pressure gets above a certain limit (basically, the strength of the rock holding the lava in). The higher the limit, the more catastrophic the eruption. This is what happened at Mt. St. Helens; the pressure built and built and built, and all of a sudden, an earthquake weakened the mountainside. Then, all that pressure was able to escape, resulting in a cataclysmic explosion.
Now, we've got a volcano that (to the best of my knowledge) is erupting fairly normally. In other words, the pressure is already quite high. You want to seal it up under hundreds of feet of rock to stop the current eruption, forcing the pressure to build even higher. And higher. And higher. Until all of a sudden, the rock can't hold it anymore and –*
I'll leave the Michael Bay sfx to your imagination.[/QUOTE]
No no.. you misunderstand, or perhaps I didn't make myself clear... Maybe I'm thinking two ways to do it.. at first I was thinking just blow a huge hole in it and fill it in.. but after briefly reading a description of it, I think it would be better to make a hole bigger in the ICE, which is worsening the problem but also make it "run out of steam" so to say.. it's probably a temporary (seasonal) fix at best but other than bombing a glacier, how do you stop a volcano that threatens mega international travel?