Of course. Just as anyone who had the slightest chance to stop Timothy McVeigh or Marc Lepine would likely go back and do so. Or should.Still, given the opportunity, I would do that weekend over in a heartbeat, no matter what it meant about my own future.
Get a haircut?OoooooooOOOooooooh yes. Unquestionably, undeniably yes. There is one thing I would undo a million times over.
but... if you did that, you would find the thread again and become stuck in an infinite time loop!I would go back in time and stop myself from reading this thread.
but... if you did that, you would find the thread again and become stuck in an infinite time loop.I would go back in time and stop myself from reading this thread.
but... if you did that, wouldn't you find the thread again and become stuck in an infinite time loop?I would go back in time and stop myself from reading this thread.
Since you appear more secure that a redo would make a difference, you can have mine.I'd have to buy someone elses redo so I could do both.
Since you appear more secure that a redo would make a difference, you can have mine.[/QUOTE]I'd have to buy someone elses redo so I could do both.
I'd go quite the opposite route -- "I wouldn't have told her how I felt."I'll go ahead and get the one everyone's thinking out of the way.
"I'd have told her how I felt."
Mine's the exact opposite, actually.I'll go ahead and get the one everyone's thinking out of the way.
"I'd have told her how I felt."
Maddux Donner said:We never remember the ones we save. And we never forget the ones we fail. It's about taking responsibility for our choices. About learning from sacrifice. It's those hard lessons that shape us and how we respond; where we go in our lives.
I don't think there's ever been a man or a woman without some sort of regret, and that's probably a good thing. Because it's our failures, more than our successes, that make us who we are.
I never did for the past 20 years, Im supposed to have dead sperm with less than 0.1% of getting the girl pregnant.I'm betting right now, JCM wishes he could have worn a condom. :slywink:
I never did for the past 20 years, Im supposed to have dead sperm with less than 0.1% of getting the girl pregnant.I'm betting right now, JCM wishes he could have worn a condom. :slywink:
I never did for the past 20 years, Im supposed to have dead sperm with less than 0.1% of getting the girl pregnant.I'm betting right now, JCM wishes he could have worn a condom. :slywink:
Sometimes I do think how would it like to be, to win at a lottery or sell everything I have, then move to some remote country, get a new identity and start up again, but I wouldn't change nothing about my life about now, except for the balding hair.problem is if i changed what i want my whole life would be totally different and i have no fucking clue if it would better or worse.
i wouldn't even be the same person
Such melodrama . . . .[/QUOTE]being born
Such melodrama . . . .[/QUOTE]being born
Such melodrama . . . .[/QUOTE]being born
being born
being born
being born
Right right, though actually the workload was fairly heavy, as it was a focus in game design.Been more of a slacker and majored in art.
(sorry, couldn't be helped)
Haha, that reminds me of my roommate in undergrad. He was bitching about his communications courses. I dumped my Organic Chem book on his nuts and told him to shut the fuck up.Been more of a slacker and majored in art.
(sorry, couldn't be helped)
being born
Haha, that reminds me of my roommate in undergrad. He was bitching about his communications courses. I dumped my Organic Chem book on his nuts and told him to shut the fuck up.[/QUOTE]I had something similar to that with a friend complaining about the cost of his books. Shut him up when I told him my Organic Chem book cost $200.Been more of a slacker and majored in art.
(sorry, couldn't be helped)
Haha, that reminds me of my roommate in undergrad. He was bitching about his communications courses. I dumped my Organic Chem book on his nuts and told him to shut the fuck up.[/QUOTE]I had something similar to that with a friend complaining about the cost of his books. Shut him up when I told him my Organic Chem book cost $200.[/QUOTE]Been more of a slacker and majored in art.
(sorry, couldn't be helped)
Haha, that reminds me of my roommate in undergrad. He was bitching about his communications courses. I dumped my Organic Chem book on his nuts and told him to shut the fuck up.[/QUOTE]I had something similar to that with a friend complaining about the cost of his books. Shut him up when I told him my Organic Chem book cost $200.[/QUOTE]Been more of a slacker and majored in art.
(sorry, couldn't be helped)
QFTSoftcore Pornstar and Skinny Chef = hardest disciplines. Everyone else can shut the fuck up. /thread.
The music students have it worst. They have 1 hour classes that actually take up 5 hours a week. Ensambles and ect. Not to mention the hours of out of class practicing ( up to 3-4 hours a day to be at the top of your class ).
This can easily turn a 15 hour semester into 40-50 hours of work.
Exactly.Science and Engineering = hardest disciplines. Everyone else can shut the fuck up. /thread.
QFT[/QUOTE]Softcore Pornstar and Skinny Chef = hardest disciplines. Everyone else can shut the fuck up. /thread.
Practice = work but != difficulty.
There really is a rank of required brainwork to majors. It would be a happy pretty PC world if the same amount of brainpower was required for a physics or math degree as was required for a communications degree. Creative arts might muddy the water a little ... but not terribly.
This.I'm still not sure though. I mean, obviously some degrees are a joke compared to others, but then you have aptitudes to take into account. I'm sure we all know people who would have no problem learning something like math, but couldn't get something in the so called 'social sciences' through their heads. And it's obvious when it comes to stuff like Music, that some people just have a feel for it that others don't.
And let's be honest. At some point, we entered discipline A because we couldn't cut it in discipline B. Whether it's a matter of not being able to wrap your head around it, or not having an interest, you cannot simply walk into a room of a dozen university students, all with different programs from yours, and honestly say "I could do every one of your degrees."
Not the best of nights for my Alma MaterI went to an undergrad institution known for cranking out badass engineers. I know my science classes were tough, but I saw those guys bent over and torn a new one constantly.
As an aside (though I doubt any of these guys are engineering majors) this was awesome last night:
Completely and totally disagree with your second paragraph. I don't think the majority of students, at least in the sciences, got into their major because they couldn't hack it in another. I think they got into it because they liked it, or because they found it a nice challenge. I also think there's quite a few people in the world who could do any major. In fact, I know quite a few people like me who majored in both a social science and a natural science to round themselves out (in fact we had a club for it). I can tell you this from personal experience: the social science classes were easy -- I could ace them in my sleep. I actually had to do some work for the science classes. It's true, there's aptitude to consider. But then I would be willing to place almost any amount of money on the bet that a successful (that's key) physics major could breeze through a communications major. They may hate every minute of it, but they could easily do it.I'm still not sure though. I mean, obviously some degrees are a joke compared to others, but then you have aptitudes to take into account. I'm sure we all know people who would have no problem learning something like math, but couldn't get something in the so called 'social sciences' through their heads. And it's obvious when it comes to stuff like Music, that some people just have a feel for it that others don't.
And let's be honest. At some point, we entered discipline A because we couldn't cut it in discipline B. Whether it's a matter of not being able to wrap your head around it, or not having an interest, you cannot simply walk into a room of a dozen university students, all with different programs from yours, and honestly say "I could do every one of your degrees."
Completely and totally disagree with your second paragraph. I don't think the majority of students, at least in the sciences, got into their major because they couldn't hack it in another. I think they got into it because they liked it, or because they found it a nice challenge. I also think there's quite a few people in the world who could do any major. In fact, I know quite a few people like me who majored in both a social science and a natural science to round themselves out (in fact we had a club for it). I can tell you this from personal experience: the social science classes were easy -- I could ace them in my sleep. I actually had to do some work for the science classes. It's true, there's aptitude to consider. But then I would be willing to place almost any amount of money on the bet that a successful (that's key) physics major could breeze through a communications major. They may hate every minute of it, but they could easily do it.[/QUOTE]I'm still not sure though. I mean, obviously some degrees are a joke compared to others, but then you have aptitudes to take into account. I'm sure we all know people who would have no problem learning something like math, but couldn't get something in the so called 'social sciences' through their heads. And it's obvious when it comes to stuff like Music, that some people just have a feel for it that others don't.
And let's be honest. At some point, we entered discipline A because we couldn't cut it in discipline B. Whether it's a matter of not being able to wrap your head around it, or not having an interest, you cannot simply walk into a room of a dozen university students, all with different programs from yours, and honestly say "I could do every one of your degrees."
To be a proper English major, you must master the fine art of bullshitting. This also helps when you're writing NIH grants.I was actually an English major, but decided to go into computer science because I couldn't hack it. It took a while to overcome my lack of fear when in social situations and my ability communicate with other people outside of emails, but eventually I made my way through and now enjoy a fruitful career.
To be a proper bullshitter, your bullshitting must somehow make you money.I was actually kidding. Apparently I'm better at bullshitting than I thought.
Maybe 'couldn't cut it' was a bit extreme in my wording. But you sort of hit my second point with your Physics major example. Maybe he could breeze through a communications major, but if decides not to because he would hate it ... then do you see where I'm going with that?Completely and totally disagree with your second paragraph. I don't think the majority of students, at least in the sciences, got into their major because they couldn't hack it in another. I think they got into it because they liked it, or because they found it a nice challenge. I also think there's quite a few people in the world who could do any major. In fact, I know quite a few people like me who majored in both a social science and a natural science to round themselves out (in fact we had a club for it). I can tell you this from personal experience: the social science classes were easy -- I could ace them in my sleep. I actually had to do some work for the science classes. It's true, there's aptitude to consider. But then I would be willing to place almost any amount of money on the bet that a successful (that's key) physics major could breeze through a communications major. They may hate every minute of it, but they could easily do it.
I don't think saying a subject is easy necessarily dismisses it. I find art, literature, and theater to be extremely important to humanity (the humanities durrr), but I wouldn't necessarily rank them as being the most difficult things in the world to grasp with a little bit of research and motivation. But that's also the beauty of them, they're meant for everyone to understand and enjoy, at their own pace so to speak. Science and Engineering is not like that at all. It's a fast paced, competitive area of study with a lot of complicated concepts that can be very, very abstract to most individuals. To this day, I couldn't for the life of me know where to begin with figuring out physics questions. Once I had someone show me the equations to start with, I was fine. I could hack it in undergrad Physics but I knew I'd tank at the graduate level, and I like to think of myself as a hard working student. Hell, I knew bright kids in grad school who completely and utterly failed hard. These people were driven and motivated towards their subject. That sort of stuff just doesn't happen in humanities.At some point we choose our respective focuses, and whether it comes down to ability, intellect, or interest, we eschew the others. I just think it's arrogance and folly for someone to dismiss the other subjects that he decided not to peruse, just because he decided not to peruse them.*
And I have no doubt that there are people who can, and will try to do everything. A modern renaissance man. Heck, I sort of aspire to be one myself. But people who actually do that are far and few between, and so if I fail at being that incredibly well rounded, well ... it won't be that surprising.
You do have something there, I suppose.I don't think saying a subject is easy necessarily dismisses it. I find art, literature, and theater to be extremely important to humanity (the humanities durrr), but I wouldn't necessarily rank them as being the most difficult things in the world to grasp with a little bit of research and motivation. But that's also the beauty of them, they're meant for everyone to understand and enjoy, at their own pace so to speak. Science and Engineering is not like that at all. It's a fast paced, competitive area of study with a lot of complicated concepts that can be very, very abstract to most individuals. To this day, I couldn't for the life of me know where to begin with figuring out physics questions. Once I had someone show me the equations to start with, I was fine. I could hack it in undergrad Physics but I knew I'd tank at the graduate level, and I like to think of myself as a hard working student. Hell, I knew bright kids in grad school who completely and utterly failed hard. These people were driven and motivated towards their subject. That sort of stuff just doesn't happen in humanities.
You do have something there, I suppose.I don't think saying a subject is easy necessarily dismisses it. I find art, literature, and theater to be extremely important to humanity (the humanities durrr), but I wouldn't necessarily rank them as being the most difficult things in the world to grasp with a little bit of research and motivation. But that's also the beauty of them, they're meant for everyone to understand and enjoy, at their own pace so to speak. Science and Engineering is not like that at all. It's a fast paced, competitive area of study with a lot of complicated concepts that can be very, very abstract to most individuals. To this day, I couldn't for the life of me know where to begin with figuring out physics questions. Once I had someone show me the equations to start with, I was fine. I could hack it in undergrad Physics but I knew I'd tank at the graduate level, and I like to think of myself as a hard working student. Hell, I knew bright kids in grad school who completely and utterly failed hard. These people were driven and motivated towards their subject. That sort of stuff just doesn't happen in humanities.
Man. I remember when I read Thus Spoke Zarathustra. I had gone to visit a friend of mine, and discovered that the hostel I was counting on a room in had closed down. I couldn't afford a hotel, and blahblahblah.Reading Nietzsche still boggles my mind. That was one smart dude.
Hey, that's exactly what I did. Except, instead of Communications I did ...Not going to lie, I was a comp science major. I loved programming as a hobby throughout high school, and decided upon graduation to transition this into my degree. I did well, too. But I realized that I would not want to do it as a job for the rest of my life, and instead, decided to go more towards where my interests were.
... Oh. Well, to hell with you too. :humph:...except philosophy majors. Damn useless pricks!
Oh, and on a more serious note, that's pretty much what I was trying to say before.I do not demean the major choices of others, because its all about what you do with what you got AFTER you are done there that counts. Some are much harder, this is true, but then again, you go to where your strengths are.
The thing with "Communications" is that its a very general descriptor for a field that covers a whole hell of a lot.Maybe Communication isn't useless rly: