I mean there is a chapter in the book called "On the Defensive", but the overall message I got was that no place should be considered a permanent residence. And Max Brooks makes a point that all conventional gung-ho tactics will get you killed.
Here. On page 70, there's a firearms list of things to stock up on, which includes things like 500 rifle rounds and 250 shotgun shells. I wouldn't really call that an excess; considering a box holds like 50 rounds. I'm not sure how having 20-30 boxes of ammo for a rifle and a pistol "America-centric". I would consider that a standard amount an average hunter would stock. Actually, claiming that being a gun-yahoo is an explicit American trait is downright insulting and comes off as really xenophobic.
Aaaand I didn't read your post before I read it. Do remember, however, that gun legislation and gun ownership in general are treated very,
very differently in Europe than in the States. I can't speak for the UK or France, though. My experience involves mostly Finnish gun legislation and gun ownership, and as I implied earlier, gun ownership is not as prolific over here as it is - according to my understanding - States-side. The gun legislation is also very strict over here, and likely to get stricter as there has been some pretty high-profile school shootings and other shooting incidents over here in the past few years.
Also consider the shit storm that - once again, according to my understanding - starts when people discuss the Second Amendment and what it means. Does it only apply to state militias/National Guard, or does it mean that every Tom, Dick and Harry has a god-given right to bear as much firepower they can carry and the government has no right to touch their stockpiles, thank you very much? Is it an archaic remnant of a bygone era, or is it the last line of defense against government power? Compare that highly emotional debate to what's happened over here: people don't really see the harder gun legislation as an issue.
So from the point of view of someone who can count people owning guns
and the number of firearms they have among his extended circle of friends, family and family acquaintances with one hand, owning three different kinds of firearms and ammo (plus that heavy crossbow) and knowing how to use them sounds more than a little excessive.
Hell, to quote the Guide:
Americans have a special relationship with handguns. They seem to appear in every movie, every TV show, every pop novel, every comic book. Our heroes have always carried them, from the Old West lawman to the gritty urban cop. Gangsters rap about them; liberals and conservatives fight over them. Parents shelter children from them and manufacturers make untold fortunes from them. Possibly more than the automobile, the handgun is synonymous with America.
(P.47, emphasis mine)
Even in
World War Z, there are characters who actually point out such cultural dissimilarities when talking about such survival guides - yes, Max Brooks is pretty much saying that his own guide isn't supposed to be universal. If memory serves, the Japanese isolated-kid-turned-warrior-monk actually states that the part about firearms weren't that much of a help in heavily urbanized Japan where firearms were nowhere near as prolific as in the US.
I'm not trying to say that "being a gun-yahoo is an explicit American trait". I'm just saying that the whole big shebang about guns and gun ownership - downright fetishism, if you will pardon that earlier-stated preference of mine for hyperbole - is a much bigger deal in your side of the puddle than it is in here.