[News] Another Stand Your Ground shooting in Florida.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dave

Dave

Staff member
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...shot-dead-loud-music-20121126,0,4320738.story

So this old white guy - a VP at a tech company, Michael David Dunn - goes to a Florida wedding. While there he stops for gas. Next to him at the gas station, there is a car with 5-6 teenage black men with loud music. He asks them to turn the music down. They exchange words and *blam* the guy opens fire and kills a kid named Jordan Russell Davis. When police questions Dunn he claims self defense and the stand your ground law that was used in the Treyvon Martin case.

Now, if you remember in the Martin case I withheld judgement as we didn't have all the information. I'm a bit more willing to proactively prosecute Dunn in this one. Why?

After the shooting, he and his girlfriend left the scene and went back to their hotel. They watched the news as the murder was reported. Next morning they went back home to Georgia. Probably the only reason anyone knows it was his was because witnesses got a description and license number. In addition, Davis was sitting in the back seat of the vehicle and reports are that the youths were unarmed. So how self defense can be justified is beyond me.

I think that law is fucking stupid. Now we have a RICH white guy as the shooter. It'll be interesting as to the outcome.
 
Dave

Dave

Staff member
edit: Apparently I have the states wrong and can't read. Dunn - the shooter - IS from Florida. The victim - Davis - is from Georgia.
 
Bubble181

Bubble181

*shrug* Country With Ridiculous Gun Control Has Excitable Idiots With Guns Shooting When Not Appropriate. News at 11.

It's sad for the dead guy. It's almost even sadder that this'll be Just Another Gun Thread.
 
Shakey

Shakey

Minnesota brings the crazy too. A couple people break into this guys house unarmed and end up dead. The homeowner even left the bodies in his basement until the next day instead of calling the police.

“He heard footsteps, fired the rifle once he saw the hips,” said Sheriff Michel Wetzel, of Morrison County. “Then he fired more shots at point-blank range.”
The complaint says that Smith told officers he “fired more shots than I needed to.” He shot Brady multiple times after seeing him walking down the stairs into the basement before shooting him again in the face.
“I want(ed) him dead,” he told police.
A few minutes later, according to the complaint, Kifer came down into the basement and he shot her as well until she fell down the stairs. He said he tried to shoot her again, and when his Mini 14 rifle jammed, she laughed at him. He said this made him upset.
“If you’re trying to shoot somebody and they laugh at you, you go again,” he told police. He said he shot her multiple times in the chest with a .22-caliber revolver.
He dragged both of them on tarps into his office workshop, the charges state. Kifer was still breathing so he admitted to shooting her once again under the chin and up into her skull. He told authorities he wanted to end her suffering with “a good clean finishing shot.”
Click to expand...
 
strawman

strawman

Dave said:
Another Stand Your Ground shooting in Florida.
Click to expand...
Do you really think this instance fits the requirements of "stand your ground" under the law?

I don't think it does - I think it's just the best defense the lawyers have at the moment, and the only thing they can really run with.
 
Bubble181

Bubble181

Shakey said:
Minnesota brings the crazy too. A couple people break into this guys house unarmed and end up dead. The homeowner even left the bodies in his basement until the next day instead of calling the police.
Click to expand...
Well, wow, that just goes straight past any form of "defense" on into "homicidal maniac with an excuse". Shooting a trespasser on sight? I personally don't agree, but I can see the reasoning and I understand just fine - that's a cultural difference between here and there. Shooting them when they're down and out, unarmed? That's manslaughter, at least, even over in the USA, right?
 
Shakey

Shakey

Bubble181 said:
Well, wow, that just goes straight past any form of "defense" on into "homicidal maniac with an excuse". Shooting a trespasser on sight? I personally don't agree, but I can see the reasoning and I understand just fine - that's a cultural difference between here and there. Shooting them when they're down and out, unarmed? That's manslaughter, at least, even over in the USA, right?
Click to expand...
Yeah, he doesn't stand a chance on getting away with it. Apparently he's been broken into a lot lately and snapped.[DOUBLEPOST=1354119797][/DOUBLEPOST]
stienman said:
FYI: If you illegally enter another person's home you may end up dead.
Click to expand...
Right, but the homeowner shouldn't be able to kill you execution style.
 
sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

Florida man is in deep doo, unless there are witnesses stating that the kid in the car threatened the killer's life.

The man in the Minnesota killing will likely face a long stretch in prison or a state hospital for the insane.
 
AshburnerX

AshburnerX

Shakey said:
Yeah, he doesn't stand a chance on getting away with it. Apparently he's been broken into a lot lately and snapped.
Click to expand...
If he had stopped shooting the moment they hit the ground, he wouldn't be in trouble. Your allowed to shoot on sight once they've entered your home without permission (as long as they aren't trying to leave it). This guy though? He moved their bodies and executed at least one of them. He really has no chance. He's going to jail for murder unless he gets a a jury willing to nullify it.

The guy from the first post is probably boned too. It's 4-5 witnesses from the car pointing the finger at him, plus any more that step forward. He can afford a good lawyer though so who knows?
 
strawman

strawman

Shakey said:
Right, but the homeowner shouldn't be able to kill you execution style.
Click to expand...
He clearly went too far. Once he determined that he was not in any further danger he should have called the police immediately and stopped shooting them. He's going to get in hot water not for the initial shots, but for the "mercy killing" which is not allowed under any law. She clearly did not pose any further danger to him.
 
Ravenpoe

Ravenpoe

North_Ranger said:
And I'm once again reminded why I didn't go to the States for my exchange year.
Click to expand...
Because we're all either murdering, or getting murdered.

Honestly, this isn't a stand your ground issue (though that law does have issues). This is just a crazy guy that committed a murder. This is no more a stand your ground issue than it would be a first ammendment issue if the guy tried to claim it was his freedom of speech, it's a crazy defense and does not apply to the situation.
 
North_Ranger

North_Ranger

Staff member
Ravenpoe said:
Because we're all either murdering, or getting murdered.
Click to expand...
No. Just more people with guns and apparently a lower threshold to use them against other people, and hence the bigger chance of said gun being held by someone who's not playing with a full deck.
 
GasBandit

GasBandit

Staff member
North_Ranger said:
No. Just more people with guns and apparently a lower threshold to use them against other people, and hence the bigger chance of said gun being held by someone who's not playing with a full deck.
Click to expand...
By your logic you should be running screaming for the Norwegian border, since Finland has half the homicide rate per capita compared to the US, but Norway has a sixth compared to Finland. You are SIX TIMES AS LIKELY TO BE MURDERED! SIX! Oh noes!

And finland also has the 4th highest gun ownership per capita of any nation! When you weren't looking the guns snuck in!
 
GasBandit

GasBandit

Staff member
Dave said:
Conclusion: everywhere is nuts, the law in this case is bad.
Click to expand...
Correction: Everywhere is nuts, and criminals desperately (and incorrectly) try to claim any defense they can to get off. As others have said, "stand your ground" doesn't apply here, and thus this can't be considered illustration of why the law is allegedly "bad."
 
North_Ranger

North_Ranger

Staff member
Sheesh, I make one half-joking remark and everybody piles up on me. I'd make a football and/or gay sex joke, but I guess that'll blow up in my face as well.

Yes, I know what I just typed! :p
 
bhamv3

bhamv3

North_Ranger said:
Sheesh, I make one half-joking remark and everybody piles up on me. I'd make a football and/or gay sex joke, but I guess that'll blow up in my face as well.

Yes, I know what I just typed! :p
Click to expand...
*posts link showing Finland has the highest population of football-playing sodomite face-bombers*
 
bhamv3

bhamv3

North_Ranger said:
Like Taiwan's any better. We all know why you're really wearing those goggles :p
Click to expand...
No no, you've got it wrong. It's how we tell actual Taiwanese from commie spies.

No, I'm not saying real Taiwanese people wear goggles while the filthy commies don't. I'm saying some of us are issued biometric scanner goggles. All I have to do is peer at a person and I can tell their political allegiance.

Of course, the goggles aren't perfect, so sometimes I need to peer pretty hard. And I need to peer at their chest areas, because that's where the heart is, you know? And, inevitably, sometimes I need to scan women. I've had girls get upset at me for peering at their chests, but I put up with it because it's part of the job.

Back on topic, sauna pants.
 
tegid

tegid

GasBandit said:
Correction: Everywhere is nuts, and criminals desperately (and incorrectly) try to claim any defense they can to get off. As others have said, "stand your ground" doesn't apply here, and thus this can't be considered illustration of why the law is allegedly "bad."
Click to expand...
One could argue that the law is bad because it begets a certain perception of guns. Or maybe it's the other way around, it represents a culture that some people may consider bad. In any case, I think it's clear you're a gun-happy country. I do consider that bad, but I'm not sure we'll get anywhere discussing it.

(Ah, and you can't get me with my country's murder rates :p)

EDIT: I actually was a bit scared when, walking around Albuquerque in my first day in the US, I walked in front of a house with signs like 'TRESPASSERS WILL BE SHOT' or 'NO TRESPASSERS' or something like that (There had been a few recent news of shootings). I'm not saying it's logical, but it happened. It also felt uncomfortable when people looked at me weird, with suspicion maybe (I guess for walking through a residential area when I was clearly not from there?), but I don't know if it's related.
 
Bubble181

Bubble181

tegid said:
One could argue that the law is bad because it begets a certain perception of guns. Or maybe it's the other way around, it represents a culture that some people may consider bad. In any case, I think it's clear you're a gun-happy country. I do consider that bad, but I'm not sure we'll get anywhere discussing it.

(Ah, and you can't get me with my country's murder rates :p)
Click to expand...
Well no, people in your country're just too poor to afford guns these days ;) (I agree with you and am just joking, to be clear)
 
strawman

strawman

tegid said:
In any case, I think it's clear you're a gun-happy country. I do consider that bad, but I'm not sure we'll get anywhere discussing it.
Click to expand...
I agree that much of the worlds perception is that the US is gun happy. I don't believe we see ourselves that way, and I'm willing to use deadly force to correct this misperception.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top