Huh...that trailer actually looks all right. Still wish they'd stick with the original armor design though.
Raven's second post ninja'd me, so the transition is awkward. I was responding to the "why they painted it black when it looked good in silver" part.And it's PG-13.....
And it's PG-13.....
You missed the real point of the second movie. He IS Murphy, he knows he's Murphy, but the confrontation with Dr Faxx broke his will because he realized she was right - he had nothing that he could offer his former wife but a cold, emotionless reminder of what she had lost. So he decides for her sake to subsume "Murphy" and embrace "Robocop," and make as clean and as final a break with his wife as possible, because he'd been leading her on up to that point - he realized it wasn't fair to her, and he had to let her move on. And she couldn't move on so long as there was any indication that any of "Murphy" was still alive in Robocop. Thus, the cruel indifference of their conversation, which left her in tears but with no false hope of seeing her husband again.One thing I think looks like it might be interesting is that Murphy's wife seems to interact with him more in his Robocop form than in the original series. In the original movie she was just a flash back, in the second she talked to him once and then never talked to him again , and in the third all we see of her is her running away. Now the first film is excusable, Murphy has hardly any access to his memories of his past life and didn't even identify himself as Murphy but Robocop. By the end of the film he has remembered that he isn't some machine that just gives out orders, but a human being with thoughts and emotions. So in the sequel they should have developed on this more, maybe have him pursue his wife right? Well he stalks her, she asks if he is her husband, he says no, the mean science lady says he's not even a corpse, and then he fights a crazy cyborg drug lord because action is more important than someone trying to reclaim their humanity. If they can address this better in the reboot I may possibly consider being okay with the costume change maybe.
..........wat?Meh, it looks just as lame as the original. Pass.
Meh, it looks just as lame as the original. Pass.
Absolutely not.I also don't get dismissing it because there are other great movies released in 1987. 87 was a great year for movies. Do you have a limit on how many movies from a specific year you're allowed to like?
I don't like Verhoven, but I'd watch his worst film over Bay's best (sic) film.It would be like if the Transformers movies, while being what they are, also managed to do an engaging satire of car and military culture, which it doesn't. It's a fucking ad for both.
This was actually expanded on quite a bit in the TV series. Which actually wasn't that bad, considering most movie to TV series adaptations.One thing I think looks like it might be interesting is that Murphy's wife seems to interact with him more in his Robocop form than in the original series. In the original movie she was just a flash back, in the second she talked to him once and then never talked to him again , and in the third all we see of her is her running away. Now the first film is excusable, Murphy has hardly any access to his memories of his past life and didn't even identify himself as Murphy but Robocop. By the end of the film he has remembered that he isn't some machine that just gives out orders, but a human being with thoughts and emotions. So in the sequel they should have developed on this more, maybe have him pursue his wife right? Well he stalks her, she asks if he is her husband, he says no, the mean science lady says he's not even a corpse, and then he fights a crazy cyborg drug lord because action is more important than someone trying to reclaim their humanity. If they can address this better in the reboot I may possibly consider being okay with the costume change maybe.