Video Game News and Miscellany

Necronic

Staff member
Ok, so after playing some Rome I have to say that there is something definitely wrong with it. It doesn't feel right at all.
 
So apparently, Vinny D has reassembled the team from Starbreeze that made the first two Riddick games for a third.
Vin Diesel’s Tigon Studios has been reassembled, according to the actor, in order to deliver a third game in the Riddick series.


Speaking in two separate interviews, recently withScreencrush and with IGN back in July, Diesel said he has “reassembled” the Starbreeze team behind The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay “to create the third game.”

“There’s this huge concept [behind the game] which is more of a MMO game that would be centered around people being able to play mercs and it’s basically the merc trade,” he said to IGN. “There’s a very cool game concept behind that. So we got our guys in Sweden that were part of Starbreeze and we’re pulling them back together to make the next Riddick game that we’re really excited about.”

Diesel said the team made the two prior Riddick games as a way to “flesh out the mythology more,” without having to spend “tens of millions of dollars” by doing it through films.

“So it was kind of us being resourceful in some ways and using a less costly medium, the video game and the animatics and the cinematics in the video game, to, you know, expand the universe,” he said.

The latest Riddick film is now in theaters and it pulled in over $18.7 Million last weekend.
That's actually pretty rad news. The games have been the best part of the entire Riddick media package. By a long God damn shot.
 
That's actually pretty rad news. The games have been the best part of the entire Riddick media package. By a long God damn shot.
Being a rabid fanboy of the Riddick series I'll say they're a solid addition, but not the best part and definitely not by a long damn shot. Though that's simply my opinion.

Side note: I squeal with glee everytime the new Riddick trailer shows up.
 
God damn were the Riddick games good. Out of the entire series, Pitch Black is still, IMO, the best part of the whole Riddick ouvre.
 
Is it wrong that I totally want a PS Vita TV? I understand that there's no plans for an NA release, but I'd buy one Sony. It's cheap enough to be an impulse buy for me. I also get that it apparently can't play all Vita games, since it lacks touchscreen, camera and mic but enough of them, plus the whole choke load of PSN and classic line but it's a hundred bucks. It's basically spitting in the Ouya's face. It's a hopefully not shitty Ouya.

 
Is it wrong that I totally want a PS Vita TV? I understand that there's no plans for an NA release, but I'd buy one Sony. It's cheap enough to be an impulse buy for me. I also get that it apparently can't play all Vita games, since it lacks touchscreen, camera and mic but enough of them, plus the whole choke load of PSN and classic line but it's a hundred bucks. It's basically spitting in the Ouya's face. It's a hopefully not shitty Ouya.
Why THE FUCK is this not getting a NA release? The Vita's bombed in the US it costs so damn much and has even fewer killer titles in the US than Japan. Undercutting Nintendo's price is the ONLY way they will get a foothold in the market, especially since Monster Hunter 4 is a 3DS exclusive.
 
Why THE FUCK is this not getting a NA release? The Vita's bombed in the US it costs so damn much and has even fewer killer titles in the US than Japan. Undercutting Nintendo's price is the ONLY way they will get a foothold in the market, especially since Monster Hunter 4 is a 3DS exclusive.
I laugh that they price-cut the Vita just to get it to the same price as a 3DS XL.

Not buying it, Sony. How low can you go?
 
The truly sad thing about the Vita is that it's an amazing little piece of hardware. I own one, and I really enjoy it, but it could be so much more. This is a piece of tech that gamers would want if it were marketed correctly and had all of its features supported. It basically needs better playstation network support, allow all games to be downloadable, and further support the app market on it.

They have been showing more indie support, but since it's not a big selling item to begin with, this only does so much.
 


Oh wait, it still uses that STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID proprietary memory card of Sony's that costs, in the neighborhood of, thirty thousand times more than SD cards? Yeah, no sale Sony. Rot with the Vita.
 
Anyone know of any classic Capcom games getting a release on any recent consoles? I have all the classic collections on the PS2, but I figure that I'd see if there is any talk of them releasing them on the PS3. I know they did the arcade cabinet a while back, but I haven't seen any new games announce for that recently.
 
Capcom doesn't seem to like its old franchises much anymore unless they've been given a total rework in graphics or playstyle (SF4+, DmC, etc). DuckTales Remastered is the only thing I can think of off the top of my head.

Oh, there are some re-releases on the PSN of some Mega Man games, but I think they might be in Japanese. If you hit up Amazon you can snag the MMX collection for PS2, I found it for like $20 which is probably a bit of a steal.
 
Anyone know of any classic Capcom games getting a release on any recent consoles? I have all the classic collections on the PS2, but I figure that I'd see if there is any talk of them releasing them on the PS3. I know they did the arcade cabinet a while back, but I haven't seen any new games announce for that recently.
Capcom has done a crap load of collection releases lately, mostly of arcade games and other stuff. I think the most recent is the Dungeons and Dragons: Shadows of Mystara collection, which is the two D&D arcade games, but in HD and with net framework to play online.

Oh wait, it still uses that STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, STUPID proprietary memory card of Sony's that costs, in the neighborhood of, thirty thousand times more than SD cards? Yeah, no sale Sony. Rot with the Vita.
I think was going to be a given, considering it has to use the same format as the Vita so players can switch the memory card between the Vita TV and their Vita. I really don't see how this was going to play out any other way.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Ok reading the details, it looks like you can remotely "lend," but you lend your entire library all or nothing... and if you start playing ANY game in your library, it cuts off anybody playing who you have lended to. Also, any game requiring a 3rd party key, account or login can't be lended - if that means any game that has a CD key, that's over half the games off the table right there.

So it isn't as great as it first sounded.
 
So it's a way to give someone access to your account as long as you aren't using it.

Bummer.
It's still a start. One it begins happening, and the world doesn't explode, 3rd-party pubs may be willing to work with Valve to get it done and figure out a way to make it work for them.
 
The truly sad thing about the Vita is that it's an amazing little piece of hardware. I own one, and I really enjoy it, but it could be so much more. This is a piece of tech that gamers would want if it were marketed correctly and had all of its features supported. It basically needs better playstation network support, allow all games to be downloadable, and further support the app market on it.

They have been showing more indie support, but since it's not a big selling item to begin with, this only does so much.
I found it cool that my PS3 Ico and Shadow of the Colossus could be played on the Vita.

OR did that patch just mean I could use the Vita as a controller?
 
I found it cool that my PS3 Ico and Shadow of the Colossus could be played on the Vita.

OR did that patch just mean I could use the Vita as a controller?
No, it fully supports remote play. I've done it. You can even play it on the road, assuming your home network is capable enough to stream it, and your wifi access is enough to receive it.
 
Ok reading the details, it looks like you can remotely "lend," but you lend your entire library all or nothing... and if you start playing ANY game in your library, it cuts off anybody playing who you have lended to. Also, any game requiring a 3rd party key, account or login can't be lended - if that means any game that has a CD key, that's over half the games off the table right there.

So it isn't as great as it first sounded.
That isn't at all what I got out of it. From my understanding, it basically allows your steam account to be logged in on multiple devices. Which previously was not possible because as soon as you logged into another device, it logged you out of any other devices.

The reason this won't work with puplisher DRM should be pretty obvious. Your steam account has nothing to do with the DRM placed by the publisher, such as GFWL. That is completely independent of steam. Even if you were to physically loan someone a copy of a game with this publisher DRM, it would cause the exact same issue.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
That isn't at all what I got out of it. From my understanding, it basically allows your steam account to be logged in on multiple devices. Which previously was not possible because as soon as you logged into another device, it logged you out of any other devices.
I think the intent is to allow a family sharing a gaming computer to have multiple Steam accounts. Each person gets their own identity, their own achievements, but they can still share game libraries. That it will also work to allow multiple computers to share the same library seems to be a side-effect of not having the severe restriction of forcing a person to choose only one or two computers that are their primary gaming PC.

That said, I'm looking forward to allowing my brother-in-law to play my huge Steam library. I know right off the bat that he won't be able to borrow Arkham City (since it gets locked to a single account), but he may have played that on console, anyway. I can definitely see him enjoying a lot of my other purchases, though.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
That isn't at all what I got out of it. From my understanding, it basically allows your steam account to be logged in on multiple devices. Which previously was not possible because as soon as you logged into another device, it logged you out of any other devices.

The reason this won't work with puplisher DRM should be pretty obvious. Your steam account has nothing to do with the DRM placed by the publisher, such as GFWL. That is completely independent of steam. Even if you were to physically loan someone a copy of a game with this publisher DRM, it would cause the exact same issue.
Well, yeah, the stuff that requires you to log in to another service is obvious, but I was wondering if their "key" limitation also meant games that need to be issued keys also wouldn't work - for example, Borderlands or the Witcher, two games that when I bought them during sales, they ran out of keys and I couldn't play them for a couple days.
 
Well, yeah, the stuff that requires you to log in to another service is obvious, but I was wondering if their "key" limitation also meant games that need to be issued keys also wouldn't work - for example, Borderlands or the Witcher, two games that when I bought them during sales, they ran out of keys and I couldn't play them for a couple days.
I think they mean stuff like Ubisoft's shitty DRM key authentication on their older games and things like that.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I would hope so, it'd be the reasonable assumption.

However, where licensing and DRM is concerned, the reasonable is seldom considered.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
Well, yeah, the stuff that requires you to log in to another service is obvious, but I was wondering if their "key" limitation also meant games that need to be issued keys also wouldn't work - for example, Borderlands or the Witcher, two games that when I bought them during sales, they ran out of keys and I couldn't play them for a couple days.
I imagine it will depend on how the secondary DRM system works, and will depend on how many installations a game allows, independent of Steam. So, someone trying to play The Witcher from your library would use your key, and as long as that DRM system allows an installation on a second system, then it'll work just fine. That might mean that you'd only be able to loan that game out to 2 or 3 friends, not the full 10, depending on how restrictive the install limit is, and you could be in trouble should you need to reinstall your OS for some reason.
 
Top