I could nitpick the video all day over minor things that don't detract from her overall point, but I guess my main one is with using Hitman as an example. In a game where literally every other person who isn't Agent 47 is completely disposable, she chooses to single out a couple of strippers in a single level, of a single game, as a prime example of literally reducing woman to sexual objects. How is murdering those woman any different than murdering anyone else in any other level? Because of their job? Because of their outfits? Because of their sex? When the principle game mechanic of the entire series basically boils down to "murder people and do funny things with their bodies", it's hard to feel like anyone is supposed to be more than an object. Agent 47 doesn't even bat an eye at what he did because he's a 6'4" bald, albino, asexual sociopath... are we supposed to feel anything more?
Her ideas are good. Her presentation is good. Her overarching point about the disposability of women and their use as window dressing is COMPLETELY valid. But she keeps making rookie mistakes in her videos that make it hard for me to take the series seriously as an academic work (which she is clearly trying to pass it off as). Does she have an editor? Is she doing this alone or does she have a team of collaborators? If she doesn't, then I think she needs to team up because it kinda feels like she's just not able to make this into what she wants it to be on her own. With her drive and passion and the backing of equally talents people, this could be event better.