Good article. Probably could have done without the comparison to the holocaust.
The problem with his article is that it, and everything it talks about, in no way talks about the settlement issue or the other issues like a lack of legal personhood that the Palestinians are experiencing that put them in such a desperate frame of mind where they are willing to accept Hamas leadership.
I think it's been broadly appreciated over history that when you treat people like this they will quite likely fight back any way possible, even blatantly crossing the line as Hamas has done.
Take for instance the French Revolution. The revolutionaries were temporary heroes at best, monsters at worst. They brutally murdered the aristocracy of their country, and ended up in a totalitarian state no better and possibly far worse than the monarchy they started with, but it was because they had been pushed so far to the breaking point that they did not fight to win hearts and minds, they fought like drowning rats.
It cuts both ways though. The Israelis have, as the author mentioned, been in a stage of siege warfare against unpredictable....well...terrorists, for so long that they have also become desperate, so desperate that they shelled a fucking refugee camp and are trying to blow it off.
I understand both sides in this to a degree. I even understand the accidental shelling. It does happen, fuck the US does it all the time. But we at least pay lip service to "hearts and minds". Patreus made that a core part of our strategy, limiting civilian casualties (even if we did fail spectacularly).
What I don't understand is that I don't even see the lip service to that from Israel. I don't think they care anymore. And I also do NOT understand why the root causes are ignored by Israel. Why aren't they stopping the Wildcat settlements?
They say that Hamas is ultimately responsible for civilian casualties because they use human shields, and I agree with that. But by that same logic aren't they equally responsible for the rockets when they do nothing to stop wildcatters who steal land which then promotes Hamas? What advantage is there to allowing that? I honestly wonder if they aren't doing it at some level simply to provoke Hamas.
At the end of the day everyone loses.