Contact was streets ahead of Interstellar imho
It was good up until alien dad and the parable on faith.Contact was streets ahead of Interstellar imho
It seems to me that there are certain movies that, if you're going to see them, need to be seen on the big screen. Interstellar strikes me as one of those movies, like Gravity was, or Jurassic Park or Terminator 2.Apparently it's a really divisive movie. Not sure whether I feel like using the money.
For me it was the Prestige. Although both Batman Begins and Dark Knight don't have great endings (Dark Knight in particular could lose the entire last act), and the Dark Knight Rises was just a bad movie on pretty much every level.I give them credit for hiring a physicist to work out the science. There were some neat concepts shown in the film.[DOUBLEPOST=1415713581,1415713517][/DOUBLEPOST]Also, when did Nolan supposedly get bad? Half the country was ready to lick his feet in supplication after The Dark Knight.
I fuckin' love Batman. I do. I know it's a shitty representation of the character but it's one of my first theater going experiences and to this day I can quote the whole God damn movie. I had the cloth posters as well as multiple versions of the movie poster on my wall. I wore out the VHS copy. It was the greatest thing my 6 year old self had ever seen. Everyone who knows me to this day knows the "He's dead now, and he left me in charge." line from my own overuse of it.Batman: I've never seen this before and that's a damn shame. While Burton's take on the character is not without its problems in this movie or its sequel (which I've seen several times), this is a fantastic movie. The narrative arc is a little wonky, but there are great scenes, lines--hell, most shots are framed in an engaging or striking way. Jack Nicholson does a better job than I thought he would. I really never gave this movie a fair chance and it damn well deserved one.
Stand By Me: Hadn't seen this before. Good overall. I liked the kids' interactions despite the looming sense of Keifer Sutherland dread. I just wish there wasn't a voice-over, because 9 times out of 10 it wasn't informing anything that the movie didn't already do through dialogue and/or action.
What? No. In order:Eh, I don't blame him entirely for Man of Steel, but he obviously had a hand in the movie's creation and overall style.
You know, speaking of Nolan's Batman, I realized something awhile ago: he's a TERRIBLE superhero. For one, he only goes after the big guns. Doesn't patrol or help out the little crimes (a little bit at the start of Dark Knight). Second, he gets his ass handed to him all the time, even having trouble with Joker's lackeys. Bane I can understand because Bane's supposed to be physically dominating. Third, a lot of people die as a result of his actions (like the Joker chase scene and especially many parts of Dark Knight Rises). To say nothing of countless, needless property damage (the Batmobile chase scene in Begins). Fourth, he actually quits between the second and third one.
Yeah, it makes him imperfect and fallible, but when you start thinking about his actions, he's probably the worst Batman in Bat-history.
The editing of the movies and timeline presented certainly -suggest- he's a terrible Batman. Had they done it a little better, you could assume he's been doing stuff off camera, but because Begins ends with the Joker card, you have to assume that Dark Knight takes place almost immediately after, meaning that by the time Rises comes around, we're left to believe he quit being Batman after like a year and a half.Welp, guess I'm wrong, then. I still think he's a terrible Batman, though.
It's okay Nick. He's the Batman you deserve, not the one you want.Welp, guess I'm wrong, then. I still think he's a terrible Batman, though.
On the other hand, in The Dark Knight it's clear Batman has been working with the cops for a while on the mob (Batman's marked money has led to them finding the bulk of the mob's cash), and there's numerous references to how Batman's work has inspired the people and made them feel brave, how he and Gordon have pushed the crime bosses to their limits (which is why they turn to the Joker), and Scarecrow says in the busted drug sale "If you don't like what I have to offer, you can buy from someone else. Assuming Batman left anyone to buy from". They don't quite hit you over the head with the idea that Batman's been working at this for a while, quite successfully, but there's plenty of indicators if you pay attention.The editing of the movies and timeline presented certainly -suggest- he's a terrible Batman. Had they done it a little better, you could assume he's been doing stuff off camera, but because Begins ends with the Joker card, you have to assume that Dark Knight takes place almost immediately after, meaning that by the time Rises comes around, we're left to believe he quit being Batman after like a year and a half.
And yet the timeline is still poorly edited, purely due to the introduction of the Joker at the end of Begins.On the other hand, in The Dark Knight it's clear Batman has been working with the cops for a while on the mob (Batman's marked money has led to them finding the bulk of the mob's cash), and there's numerous references to how Batman's work has inspired the people and made them feel brave, how he and Gordon have pushed the crime bosses to their limits (which is why they turn to the Joker), and Scarecrow says in the busted drug sale "If you don't like what I have to offer, you can buy from someone else. Assuming Batman left anyone to buy from". They don't quite hit you over the head with the idea that Batman's been working at this for a while, quite successfully, but there's plenty of indicators if you pay attention.
Why? The Joker showing up around then doesn't mean that Batman and Gordon made immediate progress. They had higher priority targets with the mobs than with one guy running smaller jobs. If they didn't address it all maybe, but when they explicitly reference the line of events, you can't really say they didn't/poorly explained it. You don't have to assume he's been doing things off camera as you suggest we could if they edited the timeline properly because they outright tell us this.And yet the timeline is still poorly edited, purely due to the introduction of the Joker at the end of Begins.
Which at the time was just a double homicide. By The Dark Knight, he's made a name for himself, like Batman, in the year that occurs between movies.And yet the timeline is still poorly edited, purely due to the introduction of the Joker at the end of Begins.
This we can agree on. It works great as a standalone movie, and really even kinda feels disconnected from the other two.At this point, I just like to watch The Dark Knight as an isolated movie, a solo Batman story like a couple of the animated films are.
Kind of like Silent Hill 2, which was also the best of the at-that-time trilogy. In the middle, disconnected, but also the most interesting.This we can agree on. It works great as a standalone movie, and really even kinda feels disconnected from the other two.
I forbid you from going.Damn grad school. I'm going to see Big Hero 6 tonight, and no one can stop me.
Welp that settles it.I forbid you from going.
When did you start grad school?!Damn grad school. I'm going to see Big Hero 6 tonight, and no one can stop me.
*groin kick*I forbid you from going.
Ceej's really mellowed out recently. A few years ago this would've warranted a FLYING CAJUN ATTAAAAAAACK!!*groin kick*
Cajuns don't fly. They creep up on you like a gator and :chomp: your leg off and stuff you under a log.Ceej's really mellowed out recently. A few years ago this would've warranted a FLYING CAJUN ATTAAAAAAACK!!