Paris attack (November 2015)

Oh hey, after the recent events, looks like France is Doing Something About It.
France is bringing in new legislation extending the country's temporary state of emergency to three months. The new laws also grant the authorities new powers to carry out searches of seized devices and to block websites. Under the legislation, police searches of digital equipment are no longer limited to the device itself. Instead, they may also extend to include any data that is "accessible from the initial system or available for the initial system" [...] this means police may use seized devices in order to search for "any type of information on any type of electronic device of any French resident and especially any information available via usernames, passwords collected during a police search, any content stored online."
Please, France. Please learn from our mistakes.

--Patrick
 
In Brussels terror level has been raised to the maximum. Malls closed, all events cancelled, football matches cancelled, public transportation doesn't run, military everywhere. Great way to let the terrorists win. Bleh
 

GasBandit

Staff member
In Brussels terror level has been raised to the maximum. Malls closed, all events cancelled, football matches cancelled, public transportation doesn't run, military everywhere. Great way to let the terrorists win. Bleh
I saw an infographic on imgur the other day that purportedly showed Belgium as having the most foreign terrorists present per capita.
 

Dave

Staff member
Great. One of the terrorists were outed as having come in as a refugee. The rest were all nationals, but this will fuel the idiocy in the states.
 
Do refugees go to the US? I've only heard of them fleeing to other countries in the Middle East and Europe
 
Do refugees go to the US? I've only heard of them fleeing to other countries in the Middle East and Europe
The US accepts more refugees yearly than any other country in the world. 30k per year on the low end, and 2015 fiscal year we accepted near 70k.

Refugees cannot choose where they'll be resettled. Their preference is noted, and if they already have relatives in a specific country they have a slight edge on going there, but otherwise when you apply for refugee resettlement you accept the decision of the committee to resettle where they place you.

The country accepting you pays for your travel, but you promise to pay them back over time. You're expected to find work and not only support yourself and family, but pay back the costs incurred when you sought asylum.

There's a lot more to this I learned recently in this post:

[DOUBLEPOST=1448374333,1448374245][/DOUBLEPOST]And in case that link doesn't work, here's the post from Scott Hicks:

Most of my friends know I practice Immigration law. As such, I have worked with the refugee community for over two decades. This post is long, but if you want actual information about the process, keep reading.
I can not tell you how frustrating it is to see the misinformation and outright lies that are being perpetuated about the refugee process and the Syrian refugees. So, here is a bit of information from the real world of someone who actually works and deals with this issue.
The refugee screening process is multi-layered and is very difficult to get through. Most people languish in temporary camps for months to years while their story is evaluated and checked.
First, you do not get to choose what country you might be resettled into. If you already have family (legal) in a country, that makes it more likely that you will go there to be with family, but other than that it is random. So, you can not simply walk into a refugee camp, show a document, and say, I want to go to America. Instead, the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees) works with the local authorities to try to take care of basic needs. Once the person/family is registered to receive basic necessities, they can be processed for resettlement. Many people are not interested in resettlement as they hope to return to their country and are hoping that the turmoil they fled will be resolved soon. In fact, most refugees in refugee events never resettle to a third country. Those that do want to resettle have to go through an extensive process.
Resettlement in the U.S. is a long process and takes many steps. The Refugee Admissions Program is jointly administered by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) in the Department of State, the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and offices within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) within DHS conducts refugee interviews and determines individual eligibility for refugee status in the United States.
We evaluate refugees on a tiered system with three levels of priority.
First Priority are people who have suffered compelling persecution or for whom no other durable solution exists. These individuals are referred to the United States by UNHCR, or they are identified by the U.S. embassy or a non-governmental organization (NGO).
Second priority are groups of “special concern” to the United States. The Department of State determines these groups, with input from USCIS, UNHCR, and designated NGOs. At present, we prioritize certain persons from the former Soviet Union, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Iran, Burma, and Bhutan.
Third priority are relatives of refugees (parents, spouses, and unmarried children under 21) who are already settled in the United States may be admitted as refugees. The U.S.-based relative must file an Affidavit of Relationship (AOR) and must be processed by DHS.
Before being allowed to come to the United States, each refugee must undergo an extensive interviewing, screening, and security clearance process conducted by Regional Refugee Coordinators and overseas Resettlement Support Centers (RSCs). Individuals generally must not already be firmly resettled (a legal term of art that would be a separate article). Just because one falls into the three priorities above does not guarantee admission to the United States.
The Immigration laws require that the individuals prove that they have a “well-founded fear,” (another legal term which would be a book.) This fear must be proved regardless of the person’s country, circumstance, or classification in a priority category. There are multiple interviews and people are challenged on discrepancies. I had a client who was not telling the truth on her age and the agency challenged her on it. Refugees are not simply admitted because they have a well founded fear. They still must show that they are not subject to exclusion under Section 212(a) of the INA. These grounds include serious health matters, moral or criminal matters, as well as security issues. In addition, they can be excluded for such things as polygamy, misrepresentation of facts on visa applications, smuggling, or previous deportations. Under some circumstances, the person may be eligible to have the ground waived.
At this point, a refugee can be conditionally accepted for resettlement. Then, the RSC sends a request for assurance of placement to the United States, and the Refugee Processing Center (RPC) works with private voluntary agencies (VOLAG) to determine where the refugee will live. If the refugee does have family in the U.S., efforts will be made to resettle close to that family.
Every person accepted as a refugee for planned admission to the United States is conditional upon passing a medical examination and passing all security checks. Frankly, there is more screening of refugees than ever happens to get on an airplane. Of course, yes, no system can be 100% foolproof. But if that is your standard, then you better shut down the entire airline industry, close the borders, and stop all international commerce and shipping. Every one of those has been the source of entry of people and are much easier ways to gain access to the U.S. Only upon passing all of these checks (which involve basically every agency of the government involved in terrorist identification) can the person actually be approved to travel.
Before departing, refugees sign a promissory note to repay the United States for their travel costs. This travel loan is an interest-free loan that refugees begin to pay back six months after arriving in the country.
Once the VOLAG is notified of the travel plans, it must arrange for the reception of refugees at the airport and transportation to their housing at their final destination.
This process from start to finish averages 18 to 24 months, but I have seen it take years.
The reality is that about half of the refugees are children, another quarter are elderly. Almost all of the adults are either moms or couples coming with children. Each year the President, in consultation with Congress, determines the numerical ceiling for refugee admissions. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, the proposed ceiling is 85,000. We have been averaging about 70,000 a year for the last number of years. (Source: Refugee Processing Center)
Over one-third of all refugee arrivals (35.1 percent, or 24,579) in FY 2015 came from the Near East/South Asia—a region that includes Iraq, Iran, Bhutan, and Afghanistan.
Another third of all refugee arrivals (32.1 percent, or 22,472) in FY 2015 came from Africa.
Over a quarter of all refugee arrivals (26.4 percent, or 18,469) in FY 2015 came from East Asia — a region that includes China, Vietnam, and Indonesia. (Source: Refugee Processing Center)
Finally, the process in Europe is different. I would be much more concerned that terrorists are infiltrating the European system because they are not nearly so extensive and thorough in their process.
 
Sorry, I forgot to specify that I meant Syriah refugees, I don't know if the number you mentioned was specific to those, Stienman?

Anyways, Germany has accepted around 66k (out of a total of about 150k) refugees for the first six months of 2015 alone, and Europe in total has had nearly 400k refugee applicants for the first half of 2015 (560k in the whole of 2014). Considering the geographic and demographic aspects between the US and Europe, I'd say that's quite a lot.
 
It also depends on your definition of taking in. Turkey has accepted literally millions of Syrian refugees, and Lebanon has several hundred thousand.
Yeah, definitions matter. Adjacent countries get a lot more simply due to access and a lowered definition of "refugee". We could claim that the US has received an estimated 300,000+ mexican refugees per year at its peak between 1995 and 2007 (this has been declining over the last 8 years). They have over twice the number of intentional homocides per year as the US, but less than 1/3 the population of the US - so it would be hard for us to claim that they aren't in sufficient fear of their lives to seek out a less dangerous life.

Another factor is that a lot of people are taking temporary refuge in adjacent countries, and if things settled down they will return home. The refugee process only applies to those who wish to permanently resettle, and who have no expectation that they will ever be able to return in safety.
 
Going slightly offtopic, but do you guys have something like a Green Card Lottery, where someone can actually just win a Green Card through a lottery? I came across it once.. If so, is that still going (and accessible to anyone, regardless of where they're from of why they need it)?
 
(Caveat: I have not researched this, and I am relating what I was told by my school's International Services when I was in college. All subject to being false, feel free to prove me wrong)

Note that participating in that program counts as intent to immigrate, and may complicate future entry/visit to the U.S. on any kind of non-immigrant visa (tourism, study), since you are a person that has confessed an interest to try and stay in the country. This may lead to denial (highly unlikely, but apparently has happened?), or to extra hurdles and delays when applying for travel visas.
 
Top