[Funny] xHamster blocks all porn in North Carolina.

Since you're already complaining about ad hominem, I'm pretty sure "Today it's bathrooms, tomorrow it's showers" falls under the "slippery slope" category of fallacies, Mr. Debate Rules.
Since you're correcting people on logic, please note that "slippery slope" is an argument, with both valid and fallacious uses. By saying that a slippery slope argument is necessarily a slipper slope fallacy, you are either begging the question or using a false equivalence (take your pick?).

I, for one, agree that desegregated bathrooms eventually leading to desegregated showers seems logical.
 
"Fuck you, gimme yours." That's the democrat way.
But this isn't even about money. It's about being treated equally. I'm cis so I don't think about it much but I'd imagine if I actually was trans, my gender identity would be on my mind a lot more, and having the government tell you "I don't care that you completely feel like a man/woman. You're wrong" would be a big slap in the face.

I guess I'd rather err on the side of treating people with respect.
 
oh..and almost forgot Ally McBeal..also about 20 years ago

[DOUBLEPOST=1460476434,1460476224][/DOUBLEPOST]In all honesty, I think this whole bathroom thing is a minor issue compared to the other stuff in the NC law, and loss of protections based on sexual orientation and identity. But it's the one that people are talking the loudest about.

I've used the women's restroom many times in my life. I've seen women in the men's restroom. IDGAF. It's not a big deal. Being able to be denied service because you're gay, or being able to be fired because of it, is much bigger bullshit.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Since you're already complaining about ad hominem, I'm pretty sure "Today it's bathrooms, tomorrow it's showers" falls under the "slippery slope" category of fallacies, Mr. Debate Rules.
Actually, for it to be a slippery slope, there has to be no connection. Furthermore, there has been an observable trend/pattern in the social justice cause that shows that the goal of the struggle IS the continuation of the struggle itself.

Also, humorously enough, here, the guys use the women's room all the time just because it's a few steps closer.[DOUBLEPOST=1460477257,1460477098][/DOUBLEPOST]
But this isn't even about money. It's about being treated equally. I'm cis so I don't think about it much but I'd imagine if I actually was trans, my gender identity would be on my mind a lot more, and having the government tell you "I don't care that you completely feel like a man/woman. You're wrong" would be a big slap in the face.

I guess I'd rather err on the side of treating people with respect.
Sometimes a slap in the face is warranted. Why do the rights of the Trans community - again, a fraction of a fraction minority - trump the rights of the Cis?
 
Commence backtracking 3...2....1..... ;-)


Very personally, while I do believe there absolutely are people whose bodies and minds don't match up and are trans, I also question authorizing such big things as hormonal therapy and such for teens. About everyone has at one time or another felt uncomfortable with their own body during puberty. It's a time of experimentation. It's also a time where people are extremely sensitive to outside influences like being told what a "man" or "woman" should be like. On one hand, parents aren't allowing their children to get their ears pierced or to get a tattoo 'till they're adults, on the other there're parents allowing their children to permanently change their body. Again, like homosexuality, I do not think it's "merely a phase" for a lot of people. I do think it's "merely a phase" for some people - the amount of people who've had one or two homosexual experiments in high school/early college is quite a bit higher than the amount of homosexuals. I'd honestly and seriously say these transitions are probably better off put off 'till after they've gone through puberty. On the other hand, of course, I assume transitioning "works" a lot better when you start hormone treatments during the formative period of the body. I dunno. It's a matter I'm confused about, I'll freely admit. Boys being told often enough they're "not real men" for liking pink toys or wanting to do ballet, may find themselves doubting their own sexuality and be confused about themselves. Does that mean they're "feminine" or "actually a woman"? I don't think so.
I dunno, gender identity politics in high school seem to me to be just another way to make sure people are bullied and pestered for being slightly different. I have no clue how to deal with it properly.

That said, unisex bathrooms aren't exactly new or weird - quite the contrary, separate bathrooms are a fairly new invention. I'm sure we can manage.
 
Sometimes a slap in the face is warranted. Why do the rights of the Trans community - again, a fraction of a fraction minority - trump the rights of the Cis?
Trans people want the existing cis right to use the bathroom that matches one's gender identity extended to them.

To me, this is akin to arguing that consensual white-black miscegenation should've remained illegal because those wishing to marry across racial lines were a very small minority, and their right to marry shouldn't trump the racially pure's rights to a society without mixed marriages.

Or, for extra fun, that bathrooms should've remained segregated because a black woman's right to use a desegregated toilet shouldn't trump a white woman's right to a non-negro-smelling bathroom (bless sci-hub):
Excerpt from “You Wouldn’t Want One of ‘Em Dancing With Your Wife”: Racialized Bodies on the Job in World War II by Eileen Boris

Concepts of purity that distinguished white women from African Americans lay behind discriminatory acts. 81 White workers based moral judgments on physical appearance; as one woman admitted, “I always thought colored people were not clean and smelled bad and weren’t as good as white people.” Manuals for managers attempted to counter notions fanned by racist southern politicians “that Negroes have a peculiar body odor; that it is unpleasant to remain in close proximity to them” and “that there is an extraordinarily high incidence of social disease among Negroes.” Syphilis rates were high among whites as well as blacks in areas of “low economic status.” Still some employers acted as if high black rates of syphilis were “a well-known scientific fact.” A hospital in Oakland, California, for example, refused to hire “experienced Negro girls” as dieticians because “Negroes couldn’t pass Wassermann tests.” A New York State handbook reminded managers that “the possibility of acquiring a venereal disease by contact with a toilet is exceeding remote.” Such manuals also pointed out that black women and men not only cleaned public and private toilets but care for children, prepare food, and “handle much of the linen and make up the beds of many white Americans.” A domestic’s touch could be ignored in ways that bodily closeness at the job apparently could not; private service work reinforced racialized gender hierarchies in ways that public intimacy undermined them. 82
Despite the attempt by some managers to alleviate fears, “the cleanliness taboo” generated resistance to using the same toilet, shower, and locker room facilities, especially on the part of white women. 83Sometimes these resisters merely threatened to leave work to see if they could push management to remove black women, but “had no intention of really going through with their threat because they knew it might jeopardize their own jobs,” as happened at a Buffalo, New York aircraft factory. 84 Other times they shut down production. Fifteen hundred United Automobile Union members walked out in the spring of 1944 when Chevrolet Motors refused “to rehire seven woman workers who had balked at working alongside four Negro women,” who presumably would use the same toilets. When more than half the labor force of the U.S. Rubber Company in Detroit struck a few months before, they demanded that black women machinists “be transferred” or the company provide separate toilets for them. In contrast, lack of racial friction at Pullman’s railroad operations may have derived from company adherence to segregated toilets and related facilities. 85 [End Page 94]
The hearing before the WLB over the December 1943 strike at the Baltimore Western Electric plant illuminates the racialized gendered subtext behind contests over employment discrimination. Toilet integration was central to this job action. Though only 200 out of 6,000 eligible employees participated in the strike vote, the presence of picket lines dropped attendance to about 30 percent of the workforce, with almost all black workers crossing the lines. The U.S. army took over this plant deemed vital to the war effort. 86
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Trans people want the existing cis right to use the bathroom that matches one's gender identity extended to them.

To me, this is akin to arguing that consensual white-black miscegenation should've remained illegal because those wishing to marry across racial lines were a very small minority, and their right to marry shouldn't trump the racially pure's rights to a society without mixed marriages.

Or, for extra fun, that bathrooms should've remained segregated because a black woman's right to use a desegregated toilet shouldn't trump a white woman's right to a non-negro-smelling bathroom (bless sci-hub):
But those aren't equivalent things. It's not talking about "desegregating" the genders of bathrooms, it's talking about putting one who is demonstrably, physically NOT into the other because they feel it suits them better. It would be more akin to saying that a "negro" should be allowed to use a whites-only bathroom because they feel they are white, but leave the segregationist system intact.

Which is a different, asinine argument.
 
But those aren't equivalent things. It's not talking about "desegregating" the genders of bathrooms, it's talking about putting one who is demonstrably, physically NOT into the other because they feel it suits them better. It would be more akin to saying that a "negro" should be allowed to use a whites-only bathroom because they feel they are white, but leave the segregationist system intact.

Which is a different, asinine argument.
You're right, the situation is worse, because trans people don't even get their own bathrooms :D
 

GasBandit

Staff member
You're right, the situation is even worse, because trans people don't even get their own bathrooms :D
Sure they do. And furthermore, unisex bathrooms are even a thing in some places.

I'm personally all for making every bathroom unisex and being done with it, but I know there are others who don't share my views and I'm not arrogant enough to say that my solution is the only one and vilify my opposition. Not that anybody in this argument does that, no sir.
 
Sure they do.
Then the situation is equivalent. [GROUP1] people want to use [GROUP2]-male and [GROUP2]-female bathrooms instead of their own separate but equal (taking you at face value here) facilities.

Bathroom desegregation wasn't about making males and females use the same bathroom, though the fear of black male rape was used to power a slippery slope argument, funnily enough. Google for sources.

E.g.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Then the situation is equivalent.
I think you misunderstand. I said "sure they do," not because there are separate trans bathrooms, but because bathrooms are already available for both genders - including the genders trans people actually are.
 
Like was said earlier, we only segregate by gender because we are raised to do so.

My mom got mad because my daughter said her dad told her about periods for fucks sake. Because "dads shouldn't be talking about that kind of thing with their daughters." The fuck are you smoking woman?!

(I believe she asked her dad why I was complaining about something while in the bathroom, so he just told her)
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Like was said earlier, we only segregate by gender because we are raised to do so.
I said that :D

My mom got mad because my daughter said he told her about periods for fucks sake. Because "dads shouldn't be talking about that kind of thing with their daughters." The fuck are you smoking woman?!
I forget who said it, but there's a famous quote that says "Nobody actually changes their minds, the people who believe old ideas die, and new generations grow up already believing the new ideas to be the norm."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dei
(Didn't mean to partially quote you, I was going off of your post as it was when I clicked Reply.)

Unisex bathrooms are far from universal, and thus an unreliable solution. The vast majority of bathroom sets I've encountered in my travel through the U.S. have been male/female (though I've been pleased by how many male GA bathrooms have baby-changing stations).

Yeah, I'm quite glad at how civil this is all being. You're a good sport about having your opinion compared and contrasted to segregation-era ones.

I think you misunderstand. I said "sure they do," not because there are separate trans bathrooms, but because bathrooms are already available for both genders - including the genders trans people actually are.
Ah.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
(Didn't mean to partially quote you, I was going off of your post as it was when I clicked Reply.)

Unisex bathrooms are far from universal, and thus an unreliable solution. The vast majority of bathroom sets I've encountered in my travel through the U.S. have been male/female (though I've been pleased by how many male GA bathrooms have baby-changing stations).
Every single public restroom I stopped in in every airport on my recent trip had a baby changing station in the men's room, too. Two in Texas and one in Colorado.

Yeah, I'm quite glad at how civil this is all being. You're a good sport about having your opinion compared and contrasted to segregation-era ones.
Well, and one wildly-flung "fucking idiot" accusation and some other veiled implications, but otherwise, yeah.
 
Well, and one wildly-flung "fucking idiot" accusation and some other veiled implications, but otherwise, yeah.
"average halforumite insults everyone 10 times a day" factoid actualy (sic) just statistical error. average halforumite insults everyone 0 times a day. Insults Charl, who lives in cave & posts over 10,000 each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted.
 
This ban may have more impact than you think. Does Watching Porn Make People Less Religious?
If you had to guess, you’d probably say that people who watch a lot of pornography are less likely to be religious. And you’d be right — to a point. But according to this study, which looked at the connection between porn viewing and later religiosity, there actually appeared to be a more complicated relationship between porn and religious sentiments. More specifically, people who watched no porn were likely to be religious, and religious levels declined with more frequent porn use up to “once a week.” But as viewing got more frequent — up to “once a day or more” — religiosity actually went back up. This just might be the best use of our “Holy correlation, Batman!” blog post category to date!
 
Well crap. I'm gonna have to cut back my masturbation schedule. That sucks. I'm gonna have to raise my prostitute budget. But it's worth it, I guess, so I don't catch religion.[DOUBLEPOST=1460497614,1460497034][/DOUBLEPOST]Here's my poetry homework Ms @Emrys


Surfing xHamster was a sure way to make me cum
Everyday. Twice even! Sometimes thrice! Such fun!
Then I found God
And oh my Lord!
Now I can't stopping jacking off to pictures of nuns.


(I'm so sorry, @stienman)


(and Dirona)


(and everyone else)
 
I have a hard time really shedding a tear for people who are upset that they can't pee where they want
What about people who are beaten or even killed just for wanting to empty their bladder? I was told a story of a student who was not only severely beaten within an inch of their life, but also urinated on by their attackers.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
What about people who are beaten or even killed just for wanting to empty their bladder? I was told a story of a student who was not only severely beaten within an inch of their life, but also urinated on by their attackers.
As callous as it sounds, I need to ask for citations on this one.

As for the other side of the coin...

Man Strips In Women’s locker room, Says New Transgender Rules Make It Legal

Sexual predator jailed after claiming to be ‘transgender’ to assault women in shelter

California Man Dressed as Woman Busted for Videoing in Women’s Bathroom

These are not transgender people, these are predators who would abuse the loophole that is created when you let anyone decide what bathroom they get to use with only themselves as judge.[DOUBLEPOST=1460506366,1460505832][/DOUBLEPOST]


"I'm a trans-ginger. I looked it up. It means I can use the girls' shitter."
 
As callous as it sounds, I need to ask for citations on this one.

As for the other side of the coin...

Man Strips In Women’s locker room, Says New Transgender Rules Make It Legal

Sexual predator jailed after claiming to be ‘transgender’ to assault women in shelter

California Man Dressed as Woman Busted for Videoing in Women’s Bathroom

These are not transgender people, these are predators who would abuse the loophole that is created when you let anyone decide what bathroom they get to use with only themselves as judge.
I don't have a citation for it, unfortunately. It was a story my sister relayed to me through a friend of hers. Her friend is a transgender professor at a university who also runs a support group. And they had to drive a badly beaten student to the hospital.

And really, those predators would have found a way to do their thing regardless. That's a separate issue from letting transgenders use a washroom.[DOUBLEPOST=1460506524,1460506407][/DOUBLEPOST]
As callous as it sounds, I need to ask for citations on this one.

As for the other side of the coin...

Man Strips In Women’s locker room, Says New Transgender Rules Make It Legal

Sexual predator jailed after claiming to be ‘transgender’ to assault women in shelter

California Man Dressed as Woman Busted for Videoing in Women’s Bathroom

These are not transgender people, these are predators who would abuse the loophole that is created when you let anyone decide what bathroom they get to use with only themselves as judge.[DOUBLEPOST=1460506366,1460505832][/DOUBLEPOST]


"I'm a trans-ginger. I looked it up. It means I can use the girls' shitter."
*sigh* And I'm out if you're going to use images like that to mock the issue that my transgender friends are terrified over.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Well, those seem to be outliers. Certainly not as prevalent as say, deaths from firearms.

And holy shit Gas, you completely missed the point of that South Park episode.
The thing is, that episode wraps everything up nicely in 22 minutes and everybody's happy.

In real life, the Cartmans win.
And really, those predators would have found a way to do their thing regardless. That's a separate issue from letting transgenders use a washroom.
The difference is now, like that guy in Seattle, they have legal protection to do so. I shouldn't have to point out how much that changes things.

I don't have a citation for it, unfortunately. It was a story my sister relayed to me through a friend of hers. Her friend is a transgender professor at a university who also runs a support group. And they had to drive a badly beaten student to the hospital.

*sigh* And I'm out if you're going to use images like that to mock the issue that my transgender friends are terrified over.
I'm not trying to mock the issue, and I'm not trying to belittle your point. But do you understand where I'm coming from when, in a discussion of this nature, I'm to debate a story you heard from your sister who heard it from her friend? How am I even supposed to address that?
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to mock the issue, and I'm not trying to belittle your point. But do you understand where I'm coming from when, in a discussion of this nature, I'm to debate a story you heard from your sister who heard it from her friend? How am I even supposed to address that?
I don't know. I don't know why I bothered posting in here. I'm not a good debater and I'm not equipped to deal with it. Just forget I said anything.
 
Top