That's not a hovercar, though. It's a regular car. But with no wheels. So that it is slimmer, you see?I would totally buy a hovercar.
...if I could afford it.
--Patrick
But it's rated safest in a crash.That's not a hovercar, though. It's a regular car. But with no wheels. So that it is slimmer, you see?
Now that's a false equivalency, and you know it.That's not a hovercar, though. It's a regular car. But with no wheels. So that it is slimmer, you see?
You think people who buy iPhones use it as a phone? It's an ipod with texting.Now that's a false equivalency, and you know it.
Removed the stereo system, maybe, but wheels? C'mon...
--Patrick
I'm pretty sure that applies to most smartphones, not just apple ones.You think people who buy iPhones use it as a phone? It's an ipod with texting.
This does lend credence to my theory that the real GasBandit doesn't post anymore and you are actually an elaborate Perl script.Reviewing my process for posting images has revealed to me a flaw in our forum structure! See if you can find it.
I can count on one hand the total number of times I've used my headphone jack over the past year.You think people who buy iPhones use it as a phone? It's an ipod with texting.
Yet, I use mine for several hours a day. We all use things differently, but totally removing the option to use a physical plug on the phone (without buying an adapter) sucks for the way that a very large number of people use their phones.I can count on one hand the total number of times I've used my headphone jack over the past year.
Well, perhaps that's not true. I might actually need to use two hands.
I suppose this means I'll be minimally impacted by this sort of change.
--Patrick
I can count the number of times I used my head phone jack on one hand too. It would be about 90 times.I can count on one hand the total number of times I've used my headphone jack over the past year.
Well, perhaps that's not true. I might actually need to use two hands.
I suppose this means I'll be minimally impacted by this sort of change.
--Patrick
I did say that.We all use things differently
We are all elaborate Perl scripts (except for @stienman, who was an experiment in Python, and @Charlie Don't Surf, who was written in VB.)This does lend credence to my theory that the real GasBandit doesn't post anymore and you are actually an elaborate Perl script.
It's not often I'm disappointed in an Ars Technica article, but this one didn't say what the harbinger demo IS, nor give examples of products affected. Felt like a waste of time to read anything past the headline.I did say that.
I'm actually just happy that the thing being discontinued is finally something I don't care about for a change. Every other time something gets removed or discontinued, it's been something I really liked.
--Patrick
That's because the assertion is that this effect affects any product.this one didn't say what the harbinger demo IS, nor give examples of products affected.
Doing that would have broken the link.I was sorely tempted to change your title to "Harbinger of Retail Doom"
I'm genuinely curious how it would have.Doing that would have broken the link.
--Patrick
Oh, he meant my user title. I thought he meant the title of the web page I was linking.I'm genuinely curious how it would have.
I fondly remember when anybody could change anybody else's title by spending halbucks.Oh, he meant my user title. I thought he meant the title of the web page I was linking.
Anyhow, changing my personal title "on a whim" would be conduct unbecoming of an admin (i.e., abuse), so I'm glad he was able to resist.
--Patrick
I fondly remember gaming the investment software for halbucks.I fondly remember when anybody could change anybody else's title by spending halbucks.
I'm too stupid to know if this is an insult or not@Charlie Don't Surf, who was written in VB.).
It could be taken many ways.I'm too stupid to know if this is an insult or not
What? No. It's because he named himself with a movie reference, a form of visual art.Visual Basic? I'd say that's pretty much an insult.
It's from a book called the Elements of Eloquence - super interesting read. The reason he specifically mentions "green great dragons" is because just before that passage he discusses a story Tolkien wrote as a small boy, about a green great dragon - and how he was crushed when he mother told him there can only be great green dragons.
The worst is that VB.NET gets a ton of shit, but C# is considered a respectable language when they're basically the same fucking thing.Yes, comparing something to VB is usually pejorative, in the sense of simplistic/child's play/not even trying/etc because VB is not considered to be a "real" programming language by the PC Programming Master Race.
--Patrick
Someone once told me that I should do myself a favor and learn all the .NET things because they were going to be the future and I would have essentially unlimited income as a result. This was prior to 4.0. I still don't know how much of an opportunity I passed up.The worst is that VB.NET gets a ton of shit, but C# is considered a respectable language when they're basically the same fucking thing.