Funny (political, religious) pictures

Charlie Don't Surf

Charlie Don't Surf

slow down on the skull chat y'all, it's veering dangerously close to someone agreeing with the villain from Django Unchained that literally twirls his mustache on several occasions.
 
PatrThom

PatrThom

I'm actually in favor of giving Trump access to nuclear weapons.
Well, just one, actually.
On an atoll.
By himself.
...things should take care of themselves at that point.

--Patrick
 
Gruebeard

Gruebeard

A presidential candidate named Trump
Lingered last in line with Lump,
And being so pushy,
He grabbed her by the pussy
With one little hand, with the other, his stump.
 
Last edited:
Dave

Dave

Staff member
Another one who goes by Hill
Saw an office that she could fill
The DNC cheated
So Bernie's defeated
The election is hers to lose (still).
 
blotsfan

blotsfan

I don't know if this is the correct thread, but this is kind of amazing.



He's obviously 100% correct, but I don't think that was the tone he meant to convey.
 
strawman

strawman

If you don't have any morality then consent is the only thing you can believe is wrong about what trump has said.

If you have morals then consent is just the beginning of the long list of things wrong about what trump said.

Though I'm not sure Rush is that nuanced and I'm not about to read the whole context of his statements.
 
MindDetective

MindDetective

You talk about morality as if it is singularly defined. I can't say I agree that it is even well defined, let alone not subject to strong influences from culture, environment, and Social pressures.
 
Chad Sexington

Chad Sexington

stienman said:
If you don't have any morality then consent is the only thing you can believe is wrong about what trump has said.

If you have morals then consent is just the beginning of the long list of things wrong about what trump said.

Though I'm not sure Rush is that nuanced and I'm not about to read the whole context of his statements.
Click to expand...
Well, surely it is a moral principle that consent is necessary? If you have no morality, then you probably are okay with people acting without consent.
 
GasBandit

GasBandit

Staff member
I'm fairly sure what Rush is doing is lamenting that things other than missionary PIV sex within wedlock are not considered immoral anymore, that mere consent is too low a threshold to morality.

Which, as a libertarian, is anathema to me.
 
PatrThom

PatrThom

Right. He's lamenting the fact that, so long as all parties give their consent, that somehow legitimizes whatever it is they're doing.
If he's going to complain about that fact, then he should never be party to a treaty nor try to go into contract law.

--Patrick
 
bhamv3

bhamv3

sixpackshaker said:
I heard that male porn stars get more money, because there are fewer guys with 9"+ dicks than there are women that will fuck for money.
Click to expand...
I've heard the opposite, actually, that male porn performers generally earn less per session or per film than their female counterparts, due to there being a larger supply of men willing to do porn.

Neither of them tend to be all that well paid, though, which is why very few people can do porn as a full time profession.
 
fade

fade

Staff member
bhamv3 said:
I've heard the opposite, actually, that male porn performers generally earn less per session or per film than their female counterparts, due to there being a larger supply of men willing to do porn.

Neither of them tend to be all that well paid, though, which is why very few people can do porn as a full time profession.
Click to expand...
This sounds like something you've researched...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top