Dear god, that's hilarious.
Dear god, that's hilarious.
I tried finding a picture of a toddler dressed as Roadhog for this, I really did.I wonder if any kids dressed as a hooker.
Now if people could only understand how this is basically the same as Breitbart we'd be all set.
Seeing those hilarious headlines change week to week was one of the side perks of working at a Safeway in High School.
Aww, wookit his tiny widdle hands![DOUBLEPOST=1481563034,1481562858][/DOUBLEPOST]
I felt the same way - neither should be higher-up than Reuters or AP, let alone put on the same level as BBC.I think outright, my only beefs are that Huffpo and Fox are both way too high up.
Well, the graph looks like an angel, so it must be God's will.
This ought to get a bunch of people's panties in a twist.
Nah, it's totally devils horns upside down.Well, the graph looks like an angel, so it must be God's will.
--Patrick
I found the The New York Times to be about as left as the Globe and Mail. Fucking international bias, showing only American and British media.I think that the right-wing ones (that I've heard of) are about correct left-right (agree that Fox News is a bit too high up there, but not drastically), but the "mainstream" ones should shift left about a half-step on the scale (except probably Reuters, they have little built-in bias in their articles IMO). But that shows each of our own biases as well as to what's "moderate" or not. Basically, few people on here are moderate (there is a left-wing bias, on the whole), so if most agree that it's accurate, then at least some of it SHOULD go to the left a bit.
IMO at least.
That's because there is no slot for "comically bad".I find it interesting that CBS News didn't even make the chart.
I assume he carries a gun there so often that it wore a hole into his pantsOne wonders if he had to poke a hole in the seat of his pants, or if he already had some pants with a hole in it and decided to make use of it.