Probably just younger kids, I started doing layovers alone at 15 (so at least Delta, KLM, and Air France don't care).Hmmm, most airlines don't allow unaccompanied minors to not fly direct, but maybe that's just for younger kids who need staff supervision.
Gotta be an age limit on it, or something, but it's not a NEW thing for minors to fly as I remember back in the early 90s my 15-year-old sister supervised my brother and I (both younger) across INTERNATIONAL connections (much like how in this case it was, Denver - Toronto - Thunder Bay, the last two being in Canada). So it's been a "thing" for quite a while.Probably just younger kids, I started doing layovers alone at 15 (so at least Delta, KLM, and Air France don't care).
Not to use myself as the ultimate anecdote generator but... After the university coordinator that was supposed to pick me up blew me off (well, he sent me an e-mail while I was over international waters saying "hey, I can't pick you up, and you're not allowed to stay in the dorm until 4 days from now."), I hailed a cab, made it to the college town near midnight, and rented a room at the first hotel I tried. I used emergency cash for the cab, and a debit card for the hotel. I was 16.5-ish at the time, but my age didn't come into question at any point.In the story I linked the person was 15. I don't have a problem with them traveling alone, but when things go wrong, they (probably) can't rent a hotel room by themselves for instance, as that usually requires a credit card, which I don't think most teenagers have (do they?). Bank cards aren't the same, and even then, can they get a room by themselves? I've honestly never thought about this.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18-21 depending on the hotel, because of liability/contract law. It was a Holiday Inn. Maybe the front desk took pity on me or something. It was a college town with non-negligible international student presence. All I know is I wasn't carded, and nobody was called.I'm surprised. In most cases you can't rent a hotel room under the age of 18. (Or is it 17? Been too long.)
Isn't there a way to get a "child card" (essentially) off of a parent's account? The name on the card would be the child's, though the statement would still go to the parent.The biggest hurdle is that most hotels require a credit card, which generally can't be acquired in one's own name until age 18.
You can do that but you'd need a parent willing to let you. You'd have to trust your kid not to spend like a moron.Isn't there a way to get a "child card" (essentially) off of a parent's account? The name on the card would be the child's, though the statement would still go to the parent.
I could be 100% wrong here, not being a parent.
Fair enough. I think I'd get one for a child in the case that I was, you know... sending a child off internationally? Saying to them "you're only to use this in an emergency, like for getting a hotel room, food, taxi out of a dangerous area, etc, and I WILL be checking the statement, and expect it back in my hand when you get home."You can do that but you'd need a parent willing to let you. You'd have to trust your kid not to spend like a moron.
My mother did this when I went to Great Britain/Ireland when I was 16, also because I got a better exchange rate than traveler's checks. I had to give it back once the trip was over.Fair enough. I think I'd get one for a child in the case that I was, you know... sending a child off internationally? Saying to them "you're only to use this in an emergency, like for getting a hotel room, food, taxi out of a dangerous area, etc, and I WILL be checking the statement, and expect it back in my hand when you get home."
I won't blame them for NOT thinking of this (this is next-level planning IMO), but it's something for parents to think about in the future for their own child.
Kids aren't dumb. They know DeVos is a know-nothing piece of shit that's nothing but harmful to the country.
Well, kids ARE dumb. However some things are blatantly obvious to everyone.Kids aren't dumb. They know DeVos is a know-nothing piece of shit that's nothing but harmful to the country.
They were brainwashed by their teachers.
Dear boomers and millenials, We hate the both of you, fuck off. Signed, Generation X.
So which is it you old assholes? Too lazy or too hardworking, either way, ruining the world.
If workplaces kept more than a minimal skeleton crew, we'd feel more confident in using PTO for longer stints, but the reality is that one person down for a week can cripple an office.
So which is it you old assholes? Too lazy or too hardworking, either way, ruining the world.
Dear Gen X,Dear boomers and millenials, We hate the both of you, fuck off. Signed, Generation X.
In the quest to maximize productivity, we have minimized redundancy.If workplaces kept more than a minimal skeleton crew, we'd feel more confident in using PTO for longer stints, but the reality is that one person down for a week can cripple an office.
Fixed.If workplaces kept more than a minimal skeleton crew, we'd feel more confident in using PTO for longer stints, but the reality is that one person down for aweekday can cripple an office.
Hasn't this always been the case for every generation? The young, inexperienced workers trying to prove their dedidcation?
So which is it you old assholes? Too lazy or too hardworking, either way, ruining the world.
This isn't about young workers trying to prove their dedication though. This is about young workers ether being unable to take their vacation time because they'll face repercussions for doing so or simply being unable to afford to take time off because they are under paid for their work.Hasn't this always been the case for every generation? The young, inexperienced workers trying to prove their dedidcation?
And even when they do dare to take time off, they get slammed by the boomer media for not vacationing in the "right" way. Like not taking that money they're not making and gambling in Vegas.This isn't about young workers trying to prove their dedication though. This is about young workers ether being unable to take their vacation time because they'll face repercussions for doing so or simply being unable to afford to take time off because they are under paid for their work.
It's generally one of those two answers for ANY work related issues, really.
"Money they're not making"? I thought we were talking about vacation time (aka paid time off) not just taking a week off. There is a difference.And even when they do dare to take time off, they get slammed by the boomer media for not vacationing in the "right" way. Like not taking that money they're not making and gambling in Vegas.
If they can't afford to take the time off, paid or not, then that's money they're not making."Money they're not making"? I thought we were talking about vacation time (aka paid time off) not just taking a week off. There is a difference.
On your days off you may find this amusing: QWERplineYou guys have heard my vacation situation a hundred times over.
Hopefully, though, I've finally got someone trained (again) to be able to cover the stuff that can't wait for me to get back. I'll be taking TWO whole days off at the beginning of June!
Gagh, it's still gonna be such a pain in the ramp up and after the return.
But I hold out hope that it will go well and I can start taking actual time off and doing crazy things like visit relatives for a whole week or something. This is sort of a test run for that.