The Awesome Videos Thread (with Extra Sauce!)

fade

Staff member
In all seriousness, though, doesn't having rotating armatures kind of defeat the design of a quadcopter?
 

GasBandit

Staff member
In all seriousness, though, doesn't having rotating armatures kind of defeat the design of a quadcopter?
I thought so too, at first, but perhaps it would allow for better failure recovery, in the event some of the engines go out, the center of mass can always be rotated to the midpoint between whatever rotors are left functioning.
 
In all seriousness, though, doesn't having rotating armatures kind of defeat the design of a quadcopter?
It's a hexacopter, not a quadcopter.
And what the video is showing is that having rotating armatures allows for previously unavailable levels of attitude control. It can fly upside-down, for instance, or hold position perpendicular to the ground, and it can yaw while in any of those orientations.

--Patrick
 

fade

Staff member
It's a hexacopter, not a quadcopter.
And what the video is showing is that having rotating armatures allows for previously unavailable levels of attitude control. It can fly upside-down, for instance, or hold position perpendicular to the ground, and it can yaw while in any of those orientations.

--Patrick
Yeah, I get all that, but part of the whole appeal of a quadcopter (I know it's a hexacopter, but I'm using quad as a counterpoint) is its simplicity and low weight of operating components.
 
And the appeal of this hexacopter is its ability to fly/hold patterns a quadcopter just can't do (at the cost of shorter battery life, presumably).

--Patrick
 
Well, it's neat and all... but I'm really not impressed by any fancy drone these days until we overcome current battery tech limitations that mean these things can fly for 10 minutes and then have to recharge for an hour or two.
Securitas is currently experimenting with security drones thethered to a pick up truck. Drive to location, deploy drone, hover over all site of the client, check the back of houses, etc, without risk of battery issues unless the car battery dies.
Of course, being wired has other issues :p
 
Securitas is currently experimenting with security drones thethered to a pick up truck. Drive to location, deploy drone, hover over all site of the client, check the back of houses, etc, without risk of battery issues unless the car battery dies.
Of course, being wired has other issues :p
I think I played with this toy as a kid. It was a helicopter on a tether but you could only control the rotor speed and pitch and it would just go around in circles.

--Patrick
 
If you have a severe fear of heights, you should not watch this video.
I'm not kidding. I think my testicles went into hiding at least twice while watching it.



--Patrick
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Feel old with me!

[DOUBLEPOST=1497845967,1497845369][/DOUBLEPOST]Kids react to Iron Maiden: "This sounds like an old man gone insane."

:rofl:

 

GasBandit

Staff member
Calgary weatherman misunderstands the participation activity of the day - "Swinging."



"Well, you go to the dollar store, you get a fishbowl..."
 

fade

Staff member
I don't understand all the high praise for this movie. It was better than what came before in the X-universe, but I wouldn't call it a masterpiece. I'd have to watch it again to put it into words, but I think it comes down to just too many obvious emotional pleas, and a rather predictable, cliched plot overall. Obviously I don't mean plot point details, but the structure of the story even at muscle level was pretty tried-and-true. Which would be fine if the filmwork had something new to say, but that was more or less off the shelf, too. The high end shelf, no doubt, but still off-the-shelf. That makes it a good movie, but not an outstanding one, and not a masterpiece.
 
I don't understand all the high praise for this movie. It was better than what came before in the X-universe, but I wouldn't call it a masterpiece. I'd have to watch it again to put it into words, but I think it comes down to just too many obvious emotional pleas, and a rather predictable, cliched plot overall. Obviously I don't mean plot point details, but the structure of the story even at muscle level was pretty tried-and-true. Which would be fine if the filmwork had something new to say, but that was more or less off the shelf, too. The high end shelf, no doubt, but still off-the-shelf. That makes it a good movie, but not an outstanding one, and not a masterpiece.
I think it's getting so much praise because it deconstructed a lot of what things we come to think of with the superhero "genre". They eschewed a lot of the big, flashy fights for more intimate, dirty ones, and made their powers a life-threatening burden, instead of allowing those powers to redeem them in the end. I agree that the story structure wasn't anything that unusual, but they took a risk making this a graphic, depressing, more adult superpowers film. I'd maintain that Patrick Stewart's performance is one of the most realistic I've seen of someone suffering from dementia/Alzheimer's, even though the consequences are purely fantastic.

I don't know if I'd call it a masterpiece, either; there are still some parts I found a little lacking. But I think their focus on your emotions, aside from the usual "romantic love/loss/heroics", makes it a unique entry into superhero movies in general. It's not a favorite of mine, but I'm really glad I got to see it.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
For me, it was (since most of the other X movies were such trite popcorn fodder at best and direct insults to my intelligence at worst) that actually being able to commiserate with the characters and care about what actually happened was a refreshing change. The fact that it felt so much more genuine, and had much more respect for the characters and their struggles, make me much more easily overlook its handful of problems.

That's a masterpiece by Sony standards.
 

fade

Staff member
Yeah, but even the whole powers as a burden thing is overdone in my mind lately. I miss old school Spidey because he loved being a superhero and loved his powers. Now it seems like woe is me is the norm.
 
It seems like "woe is me" is the norm in the comics, or a DC Universe, non-Wonder Woman movie. I feel like other films, like the MCU and Sony (not counting F4), are pretty positive. Even when there is self-doubt, the outcome is usually optimistic. Personally, I, like you, prefer a hero/es who enjoys their gifts. Logan just struck me as less "woe is me" and more "not everything has a happy ending".
 
I don't understand all the high praise for this movie. It was better than what came before in the X-universe, but I wouldn't call it a masterpiece. I'd have to watch it again to put it into words, but I think it comes down to just too many obvious emotional pleas, and a rather predictable, cliched plot overall. Obviously I don't mean plot point details, but the structure of the story even at muscle level was pretty tried-and-true. Which would be fine if the filmwork had something new to say, but that was more or less off the shelf, too. The high end shelf, no doubt, but still off-the-shelf. That makes it a good movie, but not an outstanding one, and not a masterpiece.

It's my favorite movie of the year, and possibly of the past few years. I don't know what more to say other than that, I clearly liked it a lot more than you did.
 
Top