By your logic, I shouldn't believe murder happens because I've never experienced it or seen it happen with my own eyes.
Well, clearly, murder is a real problem where you're from...
...
C'mon, don't be daft, you know very well that no one actually said you literally can't discriminate against white people. Saying that white people dominate important areas of society (
"Look at Congress. Look at the Senate. Look at government on every level. Look at the leadership in corporations. Look. Look anywhere.") implies that the effect of someone's racism towards white people would be mitigated by that fact, not that it's impossible for such a person to exist.
And of course tehre's also this gem: "
Even though Hershman believes he has been a victim of anti-white discrimination, he wasn't able to provide a specific example. He describes losing out on a promotion — and a younger African-American being selected as one of the finalists for the job. But the position eventually went to a white applicant, who was also younger than Hershman."
I don't think any child in school has any position of power.
You know, i've long suspected that we're living in a simulation that started a little while before my first memories... only explanation why so many older people don't seem to remember what childhood was like... picking on people and making fun of them was definitely a way to assert and maintain your social status.
Do you think there's any value to the argument that racism requires having a position of power, and since white people tend to have the power in this country, there's no such thing as racism against white people in America?
That's stupid, because racism already has a definition hat works just fine. You don't need to redefine it because some people pretend not to understand that the magnitude of it's effect are influenced by who's doing the discrimination. I mean, you'd have to be literately retarded to not get that your boss discriminating against you is worse for you then the janitor doing it.
