And she's being attacked for writing the editorial now too: Margaret Atwood defends controversial op-ed unpacking #MeToo movement, feminismWho will be the new power brokers? It won't be the Bad Feminists like me. We are acceptable neither to Right nor to Left. In times of extremes, extremists win. Their ideology becomes a religion, anyone who doesn't puppet their views is seen as an apostate, a heretic or a traitor, and moderates in the middle are annihilated.
Some more choice quotes from her editorial:This is "steering towards" the politics forum type of thing, but at the same time it's very intertwined with what's happening in this thread, so I'm putting it here.
Margaret Atwood (for those non-Canadians out there, she's the author who wrote the book The Handmaid's Tale of which the new TV series is based on) wrote an editorial about how she's been attacked as a "Bad Feminist" for saying that a process used against a Professor accused of sexual misconduct at UBC was unjust, as well as attacking the trend towards assumption of guilt: Am I a bad feminist?
For the record, I find her writing style in the editorial superb. This is a world-class writer as opposed to a reporter. She's using every word to the benefit of the argument. Well-crafted. I'd say she has a number of good points too. I particularly liked this:
And she's being attacked for writing the editorial now too: Margaret Atwood defends controversial op-ed unpacking #MeToo movement, feminism
I think that headline doesn't reflect the original editorial very well, though at the same time, the accusers don't seem to be reading the original editorial very well either IMO. But still, she's getting some heat from it.
That is a revolting story, and the editors at "Babe" should be ashamed of themselves. Regardless of the truth of the matter, that is not how journalists should behave.
Including days, weeks, or months after the fact, apparently.You know consent for sex can be revoked at any time....so that app does nothing.
Presumably that's always consensual.
You would know better than me the veracity of that claim.Including days, weeks, or months after the fact, apparently.
But she's not talking about what might happen in the future, just one single incident that did indeed happen.This isn't to condone false allegations, but I doubt we're heading to a guilt by accusation situation.
The App requests that consent be refreshed every 30 seconds.You know consent for sex can be revoked at any time....so that app does nothing.
Because Sports?How in the fuck is the rape of so many people just so callously discarded by so many fucking people?!
It uh... it was a rhetorical question, Patrick. But yeah, because sports. Although, really, eventually, in the end, it all boils down to "because they could."Because Sports?
No, really. I think that because star athletes are supposed to be promoted as role models, much of the bad stuff gets hushed up, just as their seamy antics get explained away..."heat of the moment/to the victor the spoils/conquering heroes" and all that.
--Patrick
Give 'em an inch, they'll take 7 yards and get a first down."because they could."
Oh, yet again, a University shows it should not be in the business of Justice.Fuck every single god damn thing about this:
NCAA President Alerted to 37 Sexual Assault Cases Involving MSU Athletes, Did Nothing
I'm fucking done with this bullshit. I may never watch another college athletic competition again. How in the fuck is the rape of so many people just so callously discarded by so many fucking people?!
He wants to appeal their decision? Fine. Let him. Just make him do it in person.And the award for "quote with the least-self awareness" goes to...
God dammit I DON'T WANT ICE CREAM TO RAPE.
And be honest, the worst part is you read the headline in his voice.