It certainly seems like that's the way things are headed, but I sure do wish I had a better handle on the current difference between "seems" and "actuality," and who was influencing that gap.Sounds like our kind of conservatives.
It certainly seems like that's the way things are headed, but I sure do wish I had a better handle on the current difference between "seems" and "actuality," and who was influencing that gap.Sounds like our kind of conservatives.
This is one of those things that would be amusing in theory but a really bad idea in practice. Even if you put on the envelope "this envelope contains the non-cancerous causing powder asbestos" I'd be willing to bet you'd get a visit by some guys in suits with dark sunglasses.
Conservative just means they want things to stay/go back to how they where in the past. The only difference is between those that want it like in 1950's Deutschland, and those that want it like in 1930's Deutschland...It certainly seems like that's the way things are headed, but I sure do wish I had a better handle on the current difference between "seems" and "actuality," and who was influencing that gap.
Can we make it the early 1840's so I can get in ahead of the rush?...and then there's those who want it like it was in 1850's US of A...
Go early enough and maybe you can even outbid Seward.Can we make it the early 1840's so I can get in ahead of the rush?
I'd prefer not to suffer through the Yukon cold.
Not even being mean, just telling him how things really work.https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/worl...-singapore-summit-with-kim/ar-AAylnRE?ocid=sf
He's mad that all the G6+1 countries are retaliating on tariffs. He's literally afraid of the other 6 members being mean to him.
“Fake it until you break it.”That pretty much sums up the Trump presidency - I don't have to know things, I just have to be a confident idiot.
Much like most of his base.
Ooh you could be a veteran on the last Canada USA war! Go round hitting people with axe handles.Can we make it the early 1840's so I can get in ahead of the rush?
I'd prefer not to suffer through the Yukon cold.
Yeah. It sure would be nice if I'd been born rich enough to matter to the US political establishment and have some say in things. Maybe if I incorporate.Trump...just stanned very, VERY hard for Russia to be reinstated into the G-7 (8).
Wow.
Fucking wow.
No collusion, only the democrats colluded.
Congrats USA, you just done got Putin'd. His whole goal for decades has been this erosion of power.
Which makes them worthless if your insurance decides so.Okay, so he's not talking about removing those from coverage, he's removing the pre-existing protections, and these are those most used conditions to deny coverage. NOT the same thing.
In the case of a genetic disorder like Cystic Fibrosis, how is that NOT the exact same thing? Maybe I'm misunderstanding how pre-existing conditions work, but if you've got something you've had since birth, how is possible to have had insurance coverage before getting the disease?Okay, so he's not talking about removing those from coverage, he's removing the pre-existing protections, and these are those most used conditions to deny coverage. NOT the same thing.
Which happens all the time. I appreciate your clarifying what's happening, but I don't see the end result being appreciably different from the end result of what I thought it was.The difference is that this rule would affect you only if you were changing insurance coverages with a gap of more than 30 days.
Welllllll I wouldn't say that.the vast majority of people won't be affected by this.
As a child you're generally covered under your parents' policy, or CHIP.Welllllll I wouldn't say that.
I mean, census reports peg nationwide obesity at ~33%, and once you figure in all the rest, what you basically have is a recipe for de facto negative eugenics.
Also, nobody born after 2000 would ever be able to get health insurance because most places don't give health coverage to people under 18, which means all minors would fall under the "gap greater than 30 days" clause.
--Patrick
Didn't Trump want to do away with CHIP? Or just SNAP? I'm losing track at this point.As a child you're generally covered under your parents' policy, or CHIP.
Sure...unless they've been unemployed for more than 30 days...As a child you're generally covered under your parents' policy, or CHIP.
I don't know if he *wanted* to get rid of it, but he signed a bill that extended it for another 6 years. (And then another one for 4 more years after that)Didn't Trump want to do away with CHIP? Or just SNAP? I'm losing track at this point.
I can't remember the last time I started a job, be it a mom n' pop cafe or a multi-billion dollar conglomerate, where I didn't have to wait at least 30 days until insurance coverage kicked in. Some places were even more devious, it was 30 days from the first business day of the first full month you worked for the company.But that doesn't say anything about a gap in between jobs are a gap in insurance coverage. Now, if jobs say you have to work there for X days before receiving coverage you're screwed, but otherwise that stat is largely meaningless in the context.