More or less, I suppose. The GOP used to be about those things, and, in a lot of ways, still is in NY, parts of NJ, and Connecticut.In other words, they're Libertarians.
Well, of course it was. It was CAMPUS libertarians.So the campus libertarian alliance held a gathering today...it was odd.
Well, as we're reminded every day around here, every party has its wackjobs. All you can really do is look at what each party purports to stand for, and how well they back it up. Currently the Republican party, which has pretended to conservatism for decades, is vastly hypocritical - completely failing to live up to what they claim to stand for. In the 90s they squandered a legislative majority by wasting a year on attempting to impeach Clinton, forgetting the "contract with america" that put them there in the first place. They enjoyed a majority for most of the Bush years, but instead of taking the opportunity to reduce spending and enact their professed agenda, they "spent like drunken Democrats" in the words of many commentators, and completely forfeited the last shred of their political sway with true conservatives. What is a true conservative, you may ask? Well, let me put it this way... if you vote Republican because of abortion, gays, or Jesus, you're not a conservative.Gas, as much as I admire the ideals real Libertarians hold, the Libertarian party in this country has become kind of a safe-house for the far, far right whack-jobs that think 700 club are liberal communists. I heard slogans more or less advocating a return to the 1890's robber-baron era of deregulation, people demanding that minimum wage and equal pay bills be withdrawn and lunatics shouting that 'the poor deserve to die because they're lazy'.
I'm not generalizing, I realize that's a very small minority, but it seems these days that the rule of thumb is that the more bat-shit insane you are, the more people listen to you.
I've spent some time in Europe and I always got the impression that in general the Roma are just looked at poorly. Is that true?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
I've spent some time in Europe and I always got the impression that in general the Roma are just looked at poorly. Is that true?[/QUOTE]Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
Is...is horse thievery even a problem anymore?Until recently (after having a talk with her), my Mom thought all Roma (Gypsies) were horsethieves.
I've been waiting for an excuse to post this.Ahhh, the wonders of two-party politics. This is why a two party system is fundamentally undemocratic and why it WILL fail. (note: I believe all political systems are doomed to fail and face a revolution sooner or later.) I just find it scary how every year, Heinlein's Future History comes closer and closer (in that timeline, the US turns into a theocracy in the 2020s because of right-wing christians taking over all houses and the presidency and stacking all the courts etc with their people.
A multiple party system would allow for different parties with different views - a moderate one, a more extreme one, etc. It'd open up the possibility for the moderate conservatives to team up with the Christian Coalition one term, team up with the Libertarians another year, yet later with the moderate liberals,... More flexible, better representation.
Because, in the end, currently the party leaderships pretty much runs their parties as oligarchies - they choose who even gets the option to be nominated, and millions blindly follow. On both sides, of course.
You realize that the argument that comic makes is "the idea is popular on the internet, and therefore false," right?I've been waiting for an excuse to post this.
You realize that the argument that comic makes is "the idea is popular on the internet, and therefore false," right?[/QUOTE]I've been waiting for an excuse to post this.
You realize that the argument that comic makes is "the idea is popular on the internet, and therefore false," right?[/QUOTE]I've been waiting for an excuse to post this.
That's not true! There's a lot of people and the things they say I don't take seriously in the politics forum.You realize that nothing in a politics forum will ever not be taken seriously, right?
That's not true! There's a lot of people and the things they say I don't take seriously in the politics forum.[/QUOTE]You realize that nothing in a politics forum will ever not be taken seriously, right?