I really don't want to get the topic to far off, but...
Of course it's going to depend on where you do your reading but the "true faith will endure hardship" is not the message I would ascribe to Job, nor would I try to interpret it nearly as literally as you are. I would agree with most textual critics that while it is part of the wisdom lit genre it's really a theodicy, that goes beyond the usual justification of God's ways in the world (here's a hint why: He's God, you won't ever really comprehend His ways, not fully) and instead poses the query: What is the source of wisdom.
A ridiculously simple way to look at the story (and this is far to simple for me personally, but we are comparing one of the most complicated and written about texts from the ancient periods to a silly TV show so why not right?
) would be to say that what we actually have is God allowing the normal sufferings of life to fall on Job, just like everyone else, causing Job to ask "why?" and attempt to understand the suffering of life all humans deal with. In this a debate arises about where true wisdom comes from. In the end God alone is the "source" of wisdom and suffering is merely a part of the world we live since we are in a "fallen" world. God does nothing to Job, he merely allows the normal suffering of the time to affect him instead of guarding him from it. Also: I wouldn't take it literally but as Jewish drama to explain suffering.
Thats like, the worst way I can broach the subject of Job. It takes me 3 days with my undergrad class to even cover the basic themes and idea presented in what is widely considered in scholarly circles one of the hardest texts in Jewish literature. So if you can fit that into Lost then cool, but I don't know if it works...
@Raemon777 As far as a good article... thats really hard to say. Most of my reading comes from commentaries and research journals that aren't online. The best laymans summary of Job I can suggest would be from Dillard and Longmans Intro to the Old Testament, it's graduate level stuff meaning it goes into the theory and lit of the book, which is really what shapes it and one must have to really understand the text, it's almost gibbledy gook without it in my opinion.