S
Soliloquy
I just wish that more people thought the ending sucked. That way I could gloat more.
Oh, well...
Oh, well...
The Sopranos ending was perfect. There would have been no way to make an ending that satisfied everyone. They did it in a way everyone watching could make their own ending. If they would have had a guy come in and kill Tony and/or the family it would have seemed a cop out. When I was watching it I had several different endings going through my head and none were satisfying. When they went to black I thought "brilliant."People thought the ending of the Sopranos sucked too.
....no, it's idiotic to blame the finale for the Walt business. It's more than known that the writers didn't account for the actor who played Walt growing up so fast, specially considering that the show's timeline was way, way slower than real life. Weeks for them were literally years for us.So it's idiotic to wonder why they bothered with all that Walt business? Turned out it had absolutely nothing to do with anything.
The finale on its own was excellent. Just a pity the finale made the previous five seasons redundant.
I loved it, but I agree. The idea of them "earning" a better existence for their actions and sacrifices was what I thought it was going to be, and I would have liked it more than the "moving on and upwards" thing.Would it have been such a stretch to just have it be a rewarding alternate timeline for everyone? I thought that everyone in the OTHER reality would die in the end and then they'd all gradually "wake up" in the sideways timeline as we saw. I would have been fine with that and it would've felt a lot less cheap than investing in these characters for six seasons only to find that they're dead.
I'm pretty sure the bolded part is what pissed everyone off. If you're going to build your show entirely around mysteries, the pay off is solving said mysteries. It would be like The Usual Suspects ending without the Kaiser Sose reveal.I'm torn.
The ending was great from an emotional point of view; everyone got a happy ending, tears rolled, fuzzy feelings, whoopiedoo.
That said, the ending was utter crap from a story/plot POV. I don't mind open endings, but this plot had more holes than swiss cheese. The mysteries that made me keep watching remain, not untouched, simply tickled. Meh.
I don't think I'll recommend this show to anyone who generally likes to know how things work (circular venn-diagram for their target audience, anyone?). Still, it doesn't change the fact that it's been a great and very watchable show so far (with a few exceptions of "fillers" during the writers' strike), just a crappy ending IMHO.
Yeah, we've been with these characters through all sorts of crap. We've seen them abducted, placed in cages, tortured, sent back in time and killed. So naturally the finale would hopefully payoff big in the invensted emotion department. But what I got from the finale was that everything that happened to the characters in the previous 5 seasons served ONLY to get us to care about them.The finale did what it was supposed to. And you know what? Saying that "the finale made the previous five seasons redundant" is idiotic too, because you NEED those 5 seasons of growing to care for these characters. That's where the finale hits home, that's the pay off.. seeing characters that have literally been part of our lives for years having closure. So, no, the finale "on its own" was not excellent.. it needed AAAALLL those hours of back story. So score another for the idiotic tally.
About solving them... none of the show was about that because they never actually did...I'm curious... how much is the show about solving the mysteries? Because I don't mind movies and shows where mysteries remain unsolved, if the story itself isn't specifically about solving them.
For instance, I didn't mind in the least that we never found out why people stopped having kids in Children of Men, since the story wasn't about figuring it out -- it was about saving the girl. The mystery was just a context in which the story takes place.
So, my question is: is the mysterious island just a context for the entire story, or is a lot of the story devoted to trying to figure it out?
That ending made it pretty clear it was a parallel to Tony's dad getting killed... i got that even after only watching only a quarter of the show and only seeing that scene... leaving whether or not Tony and/or his family dies an open question is completely different then ignoring half the stuff people wanted to know for no actual reason (except that you where just making it up as you went).People thought the ending of the Sopranos sucked too.
People are idiots.
Maybe? Who cares. Miles had millions of dollars from Nikki/Paolo's diamonds, at least. They were free of the island.Hurley and Ben lived for however long as the new Jacob and Richard? Meanwhile the old Richard, Miles, Lapidus, Sawyer, Kate and Miles all left the island and had, presumably, happy lives?
The others in the successful plane weren't as important/part of the core group and all. Or they weren't ready yet, like Ana-Lucia and Ben. Daniel wasn't ready since his mother was still kind of holding him back/spoiling him rotten in an attempt to gain penance.Once Kate and Sawyer die they end up in this purgatory for a while, but none of the others from the successful plane do? Or some of them do, like Miles who is a detective but not in the church? What about Daniel and Charlotte, they didn't get a realisation of having died even though we saw both their deaths on the island?
Nikki/Paolo and Eko in the grand scheme of things, meant nothing to the core group of people in the church at the end. So of course they weren't there.What about the two nobody liked who got buried alive?
What about Eko?
Mav is right, fuck this ending.
They all lost the Game.Rocks fell, everybody died...but not all at once.