Rape Victim? Is because you dressed ungodly

Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kitty Sinatra

From the article:

Sandra G. Rasnake . . . had one eyebrow cocked as she read through the leaflet.
She must've been wearing eyeliner.






I'm sorry for not taking this seriously, GL.
 
P

Philosopher B.

“Even though nothing is showing, you’re being ungodly,” Canter recalled the woman telling her. “You make men want to be sinful.”
Should've answered: 'Even though none are showing, you make me want to bash your brains in.'
 
I

Iaculus

So... uh... what about men wearing skimpy clothing? They asking to have a metric tonne of lady-rape visited upon them?

Or, better, for the sexual equivalent of Godwin's Law: "That eight-year-old was dressing provocatively, officer! It's her fault!"
 
C

Chibibar

I was surprise the car was still PARKED at the restaurant when the mother (owner) came back from the bank. What are they waiting for? a response?
 

Dave

Staff member
I'll bet the woman who handed out the pamphlet was a real beauty. I've noticed that women who express these types of views are those who are generally considered to be difficult to look at.

Blame the victim. Love it.
 
Wow... sometimes you forget nutjobs like this exist. Very well done article, the reporter didn't use it to slam anyone but the idiot who handed her that leaflet. Avoid the comments section though... yikes.
 
I actually liked the final two paragraphs in the article:
Rasnake was similarly perplexed by the leaflet’s little faith in mankind.



“It’s insulting to men,” she said. “The men that I know and associate with are not so lust-driven that they cannot control their urges.”
This is rarely added in this issue, so I'm glad it was here.

As for the rest, /boggle. wtf? I know this attitude is still out there, but still, wtf?
 
C

Chazwozel


Their own fucking religion tells them that they're idiots!

Romans 3:23. Paul says all have sinned. However, read this again. Paul did not say all are sinners. He said all have sinned. The words "have" indicates an activity on every individual's part. Every one of us have broken God's law. This does not imply that those sins were inherited. Remember our discussion of James 1:14-15, every man is tempted, being drawn away by his own lusts. Notice that it says "every man" and the lusts are "his own" not his father's or Adam's lusts. Paul and James are teaching the same thing. Every person is faced with a choice between doing right and wrong. Every man has made the wrong choice at various times in his life.

The bible tells you itself that you are responsible for your own actions and no one else is to blame for your actions but yourself!
 

North_Ranger

Staff member
I don't consider myself a violent person, but asshats like the ones handing out the leaflet make me want to slam their face repeatedly into the table. I'm doing them a favour, too. Nobody wants to rape someone whose nose has collapsed and has lost a couple of teeth.
 

North_Ranger

Staff member
\\"I didn't mean to do it,\\" the woman said. \\"We was arguing, I tried to get my gun to prove a point, they got the rifle with me and it went off.\\"
The sisters were in the car when Burgess came running up with a gun, reached inside the car, pulled Danielle by the hair and shot her as she tried to seek shelter under her older sister.
Yeah... didn't mean to do it. Uh-huh.[/QUOTE]

I hope she gets "accidentally" beaten up.
 
C

Chibibar

\\\"I didn't mean to do it,\\\" the woman said. \\\"We was arguing, I tried to get my gun to prove a point, they got the rifle with me and it went off.\\\"
The sisters were in the car when Burgess came running up with a gun, reached inside the car, pulled Danielle by the hair and shot her as she tried to seek shelter under her older sister.
Yeah... didn't mean to do it. Uh-huh.[/QUOTE]

I hope she gets "accidentally" beaten up.[/QUOTE]

That is mess up. I bet the "aunt" (which actually is second older cousin) is just jealous of her younger cousin's look.
 
S

Steven Soderburgin

ugh ugh ugh

ugh that is so fucking sad and i just ffffffffffffff
 
\\\\"I didn't mean to do it,\\\\" the woman said. \\\\"We was arguing, I tried to get my gun to prove a point, they got the rifle with me and it went off.\\\\"
The sisters were in the car when Burgess came running up with a gun, reached inside the car, pulled Danielle by the hair and shot her as she tried to seek shelter under her older sister.
Yeah... didn't mean to do it. Uh-huh.[/QUOTE]

I hope she gets "accidentally" beaten up.[/QUOTE]

That is mess up. I bet the "aunt" (which actually is second older cousin) is just jealous of her younger cousin's look.[/QUOTE]

Jealousy may be behind it, not to many people like having Girls hitting on their men. Just the shear stupidity behind the whole situation is mind boggling.
 

Green_Lantern

Staff member
If only the girls in the cars had guns with them this tragedy could be avoided, they could shot at her "aunt" before her aunt shot the second victim

/sarcasm.
 
I

Iaculus

If only the girls in the cars had guns with them this tragedy could be avoided, they could shot at her "aunt" before her aunt shot the second victim

/sarcasm.
Dude - we have enough gun control threads as it is. No need to bring that debate anywhere it isn't already.

Besides, the way it apparently panned out, she probably could have done the exact same thing with a kitchen knife. More easily, in fact.
 

Green_Lantern

Staff member
If only the girls in the cars had guns with them this tragedy could be avoided, they could shot at her "aunt" before her aunt shot the second victim

/sarcasm.
Dude - we have enough gun control threads as it is. No need to bring that debate anywhere it isn't already.

Besides, the way it apparently panned out, she probably could have done the exact same thing with a kitchen knife. More easily, in fact.[/QUOTE]

Next time: try to open your godamn own thread, the button is not hard to press.

Still fail to see why kitchen knifes are considered so easy to use as guns, I doubt that a 42 old woman could use one more letally than a firearm.
 
I

Iaculus

If only the girls in the cars had guns with them this tragedy could be avoided, they could shot at her "aunt" before her aunt shot the second victim

/sarcasm.
Dude - we have enough gun control threads as it is. No need to bring that debate anywhere it isn't already.

Besides, the way it apparently panned out, she probably could have done the exact same thing with a kitchen knife. More easily, in fact.[/QUOTE]

Next time: try to open your godamn own thread, the button is not hard to press.

Still fail to see why kitchen knifes are considered so easy to use as guns, I doubt that a 42 old woman could use one more letally than a firearm.[/QUOTE]

The sisters were in the car when Burgess came running up with a gun, reached inside the car, pulled Danielle by the hair and shot her as she tried to seek shelter under her older sister.
Judging by this and the rest of the article, she ran back into the house to grab a gun, before heading back outside, grabbing her niece/cousin with one hand, and pointing the gun at her with the other - presumably pressing it against said niece/cousin, since she was holding a rifle (i.e., a long, unwieldly gun) one-handed.

In short, she was well within knife range, and would have probably found a kitchen knife easier to track down within the house than a gun. Rifles aren't designed for close-range, do she'd likely have had some difficulty pointing it at the armful of struggling niece/cousin she was also holding - imagine, for comparison, trying to stab someone with a broomstick whilst you're holding them by the hair with one hand and holding the stick (quite far down, since your finger must be on the trigger if you're going to fire it) in the other. Quite fiddly, no? Meanwhile, forty-two years old isn't exactly the nadir of crippling infirmity, and sticking a sharp bit of metal into someone in a manner that will cause a lot of damage isn't really all that hard - especially when compared to the blackpowder broomstick of our previous example.
 

Green_Lantern

Staff member
Okay, Knifes are terrible stabity-capable weapons, still doesn't justify how 90% of the guns thread usually have the argument of "if only there are even more guns around" that bugs me greatly.
 
I

Iaculus

Okay, Knifes are terrible stabity-capable weapons, still doesn't justify how 90% of the guns thread usually have the argument of "if only there are even more guns around" that bugs me greatly.
Yes, but what does that have to do with this story? I don't believe anyone's brought it up except you.
 

Green_Lantern

Staff member
Okay, Knifes are terrible stabity-capable weapons, still doesn't justify how 90% of the guns thread usually have the argument of "if only there are even more guns around" that bugs me greatly.
Yes, but what does that have to do with this story? I don't believe anyone's brought it up except you.[/QUOTE]

like I said, it is a common argument thrown around in the guns debates.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top