WTF Wisconsin? (Formerly Walker convo thread)

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one seems to know if publishing it on the internet makes it law.

Boy, you'd think that if you were going to play elephant in a china shop with policy, you'd at least check to make sure the elephant could fit through the door, first.
 
By the bye: went past Insanity Central this afternoon. Was relatively quiet, compared to last month. Sad, really.
 
Yeah, really... the saddest part of all of this is that the State government stands to loose more in lawsuits than they ever hoped to gain by pulling this stunt. Which means things will likely be worse off than they were before.
 
What. The. Fuck. Remember how that bill was being put on hold to be published by that judge and they went and printed it anyways? Yeah, Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi AGAIN blocks the bill.

FTA said:
"Apparently that language was either misunderstood or ignored, but what I said was the further implementation of Act 10 was enjoined. That is what I now want to make crystal clear," she said.

But minutes later, outside the court room, Assistant Attorney General Steven Means said the legislation "absolutely" is still in effect.

Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) balked at that statement.
"It's just startling that the attorney general believes you should not follow court orders anymore," he said.
De's fucking guys, I tells ya.
 
No, they're protected while the legislature is in session.

Get ready, Krisken. We might have shoe #3 dropping shortly: word has it that Walker might restart the "laying off employees" thing again if the budget can't be "fixed".
 
C

Chibibar

No, they're protected while the legislature is in session.

Get ready, Krisken. We might have shoe #3 dropping shortly: word has it that Walker might restart the "laying off employees" thing again if the budget can't be "fixed".
#3? I thought Walker just drop a boat load of shoes at this point.
Looks like he and his GOP buddies are just ignoring the basic government check and balance all together!
 
Well, that's the thing, they're claiming it isn't up to the courts to uphold state laws regarding open meetings and how they affect legislation. The disconnect is truly astounding.
 
Well, that's the thing, they're claiming it isn't up to the courts to uphold state laws regarding open meetings and how they affect legislation. The disconnect is truly astounding.
But... that... that's the whole point of the courts! What the fuck do you mean it isn't up to them?! It's like saying that it's not the state legislature's job to come up with new laws.
 
C

Chibibar

But... that... that's the whole point of the courts! What the fuck do you mean it isn't up to them?! It's like saying that it's not the state legislature's job to come up with new laws.
maybe there is a law/rules/something saying that the courts can't uphold the legislature's procedure law? (I'm making stuff up cause I haven't got a clue)

I thought (so we were taught in government class) Executive (Governor) enforce the law, Legislature makes the law, and judicial interpret/uphold the law.
 

Necronic

Staff member
Krisken said:
Well, that's the thing, they're claiming it isn't up to the courts to uphold state laws regarding open meetings and how they affect legislation. The disconnect is truly astounding.
.
Guys, if you want people to take you seriously you should at least read the articles that you are linking:

Richard Esenberg (some law professor) said he was not surprised by the ruling but criticized the judge.
"There is applicable Supreme Court precedent that a court has no authority to enjoin the publication of a law," he said. "The state has repeatedly cited that law to her and as far as I know she has not only failed to explain herself about why she feels she has the authority, she hasn't even acknowledged there is an issue. That just leaves me speechless."
Esenberg was referring to a 1943 state Supreme Court opinion that said courts could not interfere with legislation until it is published and becomes law.
Pretty clear grounds for what they are doing. Are they right? I don't know, but it's not black and white. If you actually care about this issue then don't selectively ignore stuff. The worst thing you can do for your position is to not acknowlege clear and strong arguments that support the opponents, makes it look like the only way you can be right is by gagging the opposition.
 
Yeah, I have a hard time with that. They are saying that if they don't follow the rules for bringing a bill to law, then nothing can be done about it until it has been printed.

She's not ruling on the law itself yet, but whether the process by which they created it was legal.

This is NOT the same thing.
 
Oh boy, I should know this one, since I remember the Petak recall... I think he continues until someone runs against him.
 
That ruling was before Walker took office, yes? Wouldn't someone on their side know something like that was out there, or were they hoping no one would notice?

I'm not going to link it, because a) it's behind a paywall, and 2) just the headline makes me nauseous, but a letter writer to my local paper accuses the WI protestors of treason.

I see now where the samples were taken to name WV the stupidest state. Dominion Post letter writers.
 
Maybe he's afflicted with savant syndrome? Maybe he's done "great things"? I guess it could be possible.

It does smell to high heaven, though. A 25% (16K) raise after 2 months? The guys I know who started at 60K+ (all Wall St. folks) didn't get raises that fast, and they actually made people a lot of money.
 
Maybe he's afflicted with savant syndrome? Maybe he's done "great things"? I guess it could be possible.

It does smell to high heaven, though. A 25% (16K) raise after 2 months? The guys I know who started at 60K+ (all Wall St. folks) didn't get raises that fast, and they actually made people a lot of money.
Yeah, I'm sure it has nothing to do with this:
His father is Jerry Deschane, executive vice president and longtime lobbyist for the Madison-based Wisconsin Builders Association, which bet big on Walker during last year's governor's race.
The group's political action committee gave $29,000 to Walker and his running mate, Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, last year, making it one of the top five PAC donors to the governor's successful campaign. Even more impressive, members of the trade group funneled more than $92,000 through its conduit to Walker's campaign over the past two years.
Total donations: $121,652.
 
Couldn't possibly. Perish the very thought. ;)

Just sayin', unlikely as it is, if he's actually doing a stellar, amazing job...
 
Well, today is special election day in Wisconsin. Time to decide if we are going to elect a Supreme Court Justice the Koch brothers want or vote for the woman who said she doesn't agree with the Walker agenda.
 
So did I. Then the other slots I didn't know I voted my friends. I think my best friend would make a great district court judge, never mind the lack of a law degree.

I also had a chance to sign up to recall Glenn Grothman, the schmuck who is supposedly representing me as my state senator.
 
Wow... only a 1.6k difference in votes, and not all of Milwaukee and Marathon counties are in yet.

EDIT: If the remaining precincts in the counties with less than 100% reporting follow existing percentages, the vote might end up being less than a 1,000 total votes of difference. Wow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top