De's fucking guys, I tells ya.FTA said:"Apparently that language was either misunderstood or ignored, but what I said was the further implementation of Act 10 was enjoined. That is what I now want to make crystal clear," she said.
But minutes later, outside the court room, Assistant Attorney General Steven Means said the legislation "absolutely" is still in effect.
Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) balked at that statement.
"It's just startling that the attorney general believes you should not follow court orders anymore," he said.
That goes for the officials who aren't part of the legislature too?No, they're protected while the legislature is in session.
#3? I thought Walker just drop a boat load of shoes at this point.No, they're protected while the legislature is in session.
Get ready, Krisken. We might have shoe #3 dropping shortly: word has it that Walker might restart the "laying off employees" thing again if the budget can't be "fixed".
But... that... that's the whole point of the courts! What the fuck do you mean it isn't up to them?! It's like saying that it's not the state legislature's job to come up with new laws.Well, that's the thing, they're claiming it isn't up to the courts to uphold state laws regarding open meetings and how they affect legislation. The disconnect is truly astounding.
maybe there is a law/rules/something saying that the courts can't uphold the legislature's procedure law? (I'm making stuff up cause I haven't got a clue)But... that... that's the whole point of the courts! What the fuck do you mean it isn't up to them?! It's like saying that it's not the state legislature's job to come up with new laws.
Guys, if you want people to take you seriously you should at least read the articles that you are linking:Krisken said:Well, that's the thing, they're claiming it isn't up to the courts to uphold state laws regarding open meetings and how they affect legislation. The disconnect is truly astounding.
.
Pretty clear grounds for what they are doing. Are they right? I don't know, but it's not black and white. If you actually care about this issue then don't selectively ignore stuff. The worst thing you can do for your position is to not acknowlege clear and strong arguments that support the opponents, makes it look like the only way you can be right is by gagging the opposition.Richard Esenberg (some law professor) said he was not surprised by the ruling but criticized the judge.
"There is applicable Supreme Court precedent that a court has no authority to enjoin the publication of a law," he said. "The state has repeatedly cited that law to her and as far as I know she has not only failed to explain herself about why she feels she has the authority, she hasn't even acknowledged there is an issue. That just leaves me speechless."
Esenberg was referring to a 1943 state Supreme Court opinion that said courts could not interfere with legislation until it is published and becomes law.
So what happens now? If a recall election is ongoing, does he still get to represent his voters until the election? Or is he unable to vote until the recall because it is apparent that his constitutes have lost faith in him?Enough signatures have been gathered for the recall of Senator Dan Kapanke. It only took 33 days to gather the 21,700 signatures they turned in, just a smidge above the 15,588 required to begin the recall.
Oh, that is an interesting news. I didn't even know about that.Sanity may be returning: Judge rules "collective bargaining rights cannot be overturned by governmental edict"
Oooh, I can not WAIT for the NLRB to get a hold of that "Budget Repair Bill".
Yeah, I'm sure it has nothing to do with this:Maybe he's afflicted with savant syndrome? Maybe he's done "great things"? I guess it could be possible.
It does smell to high heaven, though. A 25% (16K) raise after 2 months? The guys I know who started at 60K+ (all Wall St. folks) didn't get raises that fast, and they actually made people a lot of money.
His father is Jerry Deschane, executive vice president and longtime lobbyist for the Madison-based Wisconsin Builders Association, which bet big on Walker during last year's governor's race.
The group's political action committee gave $29,000 to Walker and his running mate, Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, last year, making it one of the top five PAC donors to the governor's successful campaign. Even more impressive, members of the trade group funneled more than $92,000 through its conduit to Walker's campaign over the past two years.
Total donations: $121,652.