Yeah, it was pretty much inevitable with the Blu-Ray thing. Sony gambled big that they would be able to extend the life of the PS2 long enough that they could be prepared to dominate the tail-end of the current console generation with tighter hardware and Blu-Ray, and it completely paid off (though XBL probably delayed it for a while).Yep, more people want Blu-Ray. Had the 360 ever added the functionality, I'm sure it would have buried the PS3. That coming from someone who prefers the PS3 as a gaming system.
This the only place on the internet you've been visiting then i take it...I never knew the 360 out sold the PS3...
Remember VHS versus Beta?I think I've said it before, I have not played a console video game since PONG.
Added at: 14:22
I just looked at the products and the Sony looked superior. I figured other people would see it the same way.
I'm not sure thats a good analogy here since Blu-Ray won and the PS3 is doing very well...Remember VHS versus Beta?
Yes, but Beta was superior in picture and auidio quality and in many facets of recording.Didn't VHS have longer run time?!
True, but Microsoft dropped the ball so hard with their Xbox 360 GPU failures (red rings of death) and they supported the losing format between HDDVD and Blu Ray... I'm not surprised the PS3 has made such an incredible sales gain.And the PS3 came out a year after 360 and at almost 2x the price...
And obviously the difference wasn't enough to make up for the lack of play time...Yes, but Beta was superior in picture and auidio quality and in many facets of recording.
RRoD's are pretty old, and so is Blue Ray...True, but Microsoft dropped the ball so hard with their Xbox 360 GPU failures (red rings of death) and they supported the losing format between HDDVD and Blu Ray... I'm not surprised the PS3 has made such an incredible sales gain.
Damn true... granted the Jasper chipset is LIGHT YEARS better than the very first motherboards... it's still prone to failures. The Vejle chipset on the Xbox 360 S is too new to really have much data on it's long term lifespan (or so I have observed from my friends who have them anyways).Red Rings of Death still happen.
Yeah, but does that player support all of the Blu-Ray features? Not everyone cares about whatever BD-Live is, but last time I looked at the list of bare-minimum requirements to put the Blu-Ray logo on, versus what is possible on the PS3 and other players, there was a lot of stuff. More important than that is compatibility. Some of the earliest players to drop under $149 are no longer compatible with the latest discs, and don't have firmware updates to fix them.We just saw you can buy a Blu-Ray player for less than a 100$ now
FTFY.Decked out Uber PC's...
I understand. I think that is why PS3 are still selling as a gaming console AND Blu-Ray player (they did won after all) It is a win-win for the consumer since it does update, has all the features AND can play 3DYeah, but does that player support all of the Blu-Ray features? Not everyone cares about whatever BD-Live is, but last time I looked at the list of bare-minimum requirements to put the Blu-Ray logo on, versus what is possible on the PS3 and other players, there was a lot of stuff. More important than that is compatibility. Some of the earliest players to drop under $149 are no longer compatible with the latest discs, and don't have firmware updates to fix them.
http://www.geforce.com/#/Optimize/Guides/how-to-build-a-kick-ass-crysis-2-pc-for-under-600link?
Yeah, I had a $500 game rig. Then 2 years later I popped in a $170 card and can play most games at full settings.
And the PS3 still has Blu-Ray...Red Rings of Death still happen.
None of the Double Fine stuff is exclusive. You can get them all on the 360.Several of them have been PSN exclusive, like all the Double Fine games (Stacking, Costume Quest).