It might be just you or something.I'm back to seeing the network solutions page.
It might be just you or something.I'm back to seeing the network solutions page.
Congratulations, you just wrote the next week of PVP.Eye think his new vision for Brent will bring a great focus to his character development.
Or something.
I don't know, why he continues to harp on the issue, it would seem that old guard newspaper cartoonists keep proving it need to be harped on. How anyone can refer to webcomics as the realm of part timers when Penny Arcade is a multimedia mini-empire is beyond me.Should we bring up the blog post about newspapers?
eh, I mean define good living.I mean the guy said that there would be a small few people that can be successful while most everyone is a part timer. Are there even 10 webcomics people that earn a good living from it?
I think this is the sticking point. I can think of at least 5-10 who make a nice living off of doing their comics, but I don't know how many are out there pulling in just enough to not be out on the streets. For every Penny Arcade, Girl Genius, and Doctor McNinja, there are literally a dozen Real Lifes, Wapsi Squares, and Menage a 3s... and the defining quality usually isn't quality. There are A LOT of excellent webcomics out there.eh, I mean define good living.
I could think of 10-20 where they do the web comic full time. Now I don't know if they're eating peanut butter sandwiches every night but they make a living off of it.
From what I understand, that isn't that different from the newspaper model, at least the early stages of it. However, if you look at the actual quote from the guy (emphasis mine):I think this is the sticking point. I can think of at least 5-10 who make a nice living off of doing their comics, but I don't know how many are out there pulling in just enough to not be out on the streets.
He seems to not realize that the code was cracked over a decade ago. It is difficult, it does require years of audience building and more work on your part, but that does not make it a mystery. It is a disservice to the people who do make a living at it (many of whom did have to "crack the code") to imply that no one does.That means someone has to crack the code concerning online profits. Till that time, it will be a forum for the dedicated and passionate cartoonist who also works at Starbucks.
If Real Life wasn't horribad, I wouldn't be eager to see them out on the street.I think this is the sticking point. I can think of at least 5-10 who make a nice living off of doing their comics, but I don't know how many are out there pulling in just enough to not be out on the streets. For every Penny Arcade, Girl Genius, and Doctor McNinja, there are literally a dozen Real Lifes, Wapsi Squares, and Menage a 3s... and the defining quality usually isn't quality. There are A LOT of excellent webcomics out there.
The biggest quantifier of success seems to be the ability to take your comic and turn it into a steady stream of convention appearances, comic collections, and a line of merchandise... but none of that is actually related to making the actual comics, and it's something most newspaper cartoonists never had to worry about because they literally had teams of guys to handle that sort of thing.
The art hasn't changed much since inception (Adding colour, check. Using same illustrator character files, oops) and the writing is less than stellar. And it's only got more insipid. But yes, some highlights way back when.Real Life used to be really good in it's inception, but I have NO idea what the hell happened to it after year 2-3.
So it's basically like a normal Sit-Com's lifespan? Starts out good and interesting, but the characters became shallow copies of themselves over the years, refusing to change, in order to keep the audience.I meant storylines were much funnier. More grounded, with his Real Life really being the center of it. It's just lost all sense of self over the years.
AshburnerX, you verily speaketh the truth without knowing.So it's basically like a normal Sit-Com's lifespan? Starts out good and interesting, but the characters became shallow copies of themselves over the years, refusing to change, in order to keep the audience.