Is that like "the game?""Won't someone think of the porn?!"
The US bullying another country to do something that is in the countries interest but in the US's?Oh look, the US decided to bully Spain into making a SOPA-style law.
Spanish Piracy Law
This stuff is just starting to scare me.
Are college finals going on now where you guys are too? Because if they are blacking out wiki will be very successful...Wikipedia is considering a blackout in protest of SOPA.
5th most-used site on the internet. That would certainly wake up the people who aren't aware of these bills.
College will just be starting up again next week after the winter break. Mid-terms in March, finals in May.Are college finals going on now where you guys are too? Because if they are blacking out wiki will be very successful...
Or, right, you name the 2 differently... we start the equivalent of mid-terms at the end of January here... they normally last a couple of weeks into Feb...College will just be starting up again next week after the winter break. Mid-terms in March, finals in May.
So it won't completely break the internet, it'll just break searching the internet and still be an effective method to quash free speech.DNS provision pulled from SOPA
Looks like the worst of it is getting stripped from the bill now.
It breaks down the true threat that goes beyond what's in the bill--that the major media companies could say "We don't like that site; accuse them of piracy to shut them down, then keep it tied up in courts for years." We don't want them having control of the internet and removing the DNS blocking provision strips that power away.So it won't completely break the internet, it'll just break searching the internet and still be an effective method to quash free speech.
Except they would still have the power to block sites from search indexes. DNS blocking may be a bigger problem, but being blocked from Google, Yahoo, etc. is still a significant issue.It breaks down the true threat that goes beyond what's in the bill--that the major media companies could say "We don't like that site; accuse them of piracy to shut them down, then keep it tied up in courts for years." We don't want them having control of the internet and removing the DNS blocking provision strips that power away.
Of course he is, he's a media mogul. He's about as neutral on this as the RIAA.And Rupert Murdoch is pissed about it
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/15/us-murdoch-piracy-idUSTRE80E0JA20120115
Which pretty much makes the White Houses decision a good one. If Rupert Murdoch is mad at you, you've probably done the right thing.
He was spouting crap about google earlier...And Rupert Murdoch is pissed about it
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/15/us-murdoch-piracy-idUSTRE80E0JA20120115
No one from my state.
Wow, the level of hypocrisy there is absurd.MPAA said:It is an irresponsible response and a disservice to people who rely on them for information and use their services. It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today. It’s a dangerous and troubling development when the platforms that serve as gateways to information intentionally skew the facts to incite their users in order to further their corporate interests.
A so-called “blackout” is yet another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals. It is our hope that the White House and the Congress will call on those who intend to stage this “blackout” to stop the hyperbole and PR stunts and engage in meaningful efforts to combat piracy.
I bet they'd love to take those freedoms away with a simple piracy accusation.It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today.
It boggles the mind. A group that has knowingly prosecuted innocent people in no way has the right to talk about the dissemination of knowledge as an abuse of power.Think of it like this: MPAA is pissed that this "stunt" will inform people previously unaware of what is happening.
They are anti-awareness because they know the backlash it could have.
Fucking unreal.
Exactly, they're not skewing fact on their side... just hiding them...Because there's been coverage of SOPA and PIPA in traditional media outlets