Yes, but you surrounded it in the idea that the only thing you could get that's better than a second/third line player is an All-Star.
I'll try and explain myself better, because clearly I'm doing a really poor job of communicating. Which is fair enough, I've for some reason stumbled into a tremendous, inexplicable week long brain-fart that has gotten me into a couple of arguments this week with people I wasn't even disagreeing with to begin with.
Grabovski, while not giving quite as much offensive output as the first line, has, in my opinion, been the Leafs' most consistent player in both ends. His defensive game and his offensive game are both good. Not amazing, but good. And he's stepped it up recently, too late to have a really breakout year, but still.... He is an all-around player, a sort of jack of all trades, on a team of specialists. And I think Toronto needs that. It makes him more of an asset for the Leafs than it does a hot commodity for trade. Even Kessel and Lupul are on the ice for nearly as many goals as they score.
What I'm saying is that given that, why trade him unless you can trade up?
Obvsiously, that's kind of the philosophy all accross the board, and I don't think they'll be able to move him, so let's just keep him. And Burke has said over and over again that he's looking for a high producing, play making centre to compliment Lupul and Kessel, and does not seem to be interested in improving the team defensively in any way. With that in mind, I was saying that if they're going for an offensive producer for the first line which has done fine offensively all season without a consistent centre, and removing the highest producing member of Kulemin's line, he'd better be a damned high scorer to make up for the defensive hole they aren't filling. I used "all-star" as hyperbole to make my point, but I stick by my assessment.